Managing Natural Noise in Recommender Systems
E-commerce customers demand quick and easy access to suitable products in large purchase spaces. To support and facilitate this purchasing process to users, recommender systems (RSs) help them to find out the information that best fits their preferences and needs in an overloaded search space. These systems require the elicitation of customers’ preferences. However, this elicitation process is not always precise either correct because of external factors such as human errors, uncertainty, human beings inherent inconsistency and so on. Such a problem in RSs is known as natural noise (NN) and can negatively bias recommendations, which leads to poor user’s experience. Different proposals have been presented to deal with natural noise in RSs. Several of them require additional interaction with customers. Others just remove noisy information. Recently, new NN approaches dealing with the ratings stored in the user/item rating matrix have raised to deal with NN in a better and simpler way. This contribution is devoted to provide a brief review of the latter approaches revising crisp and fuzzy approaches for dealing with NN in RSs. Eventually it points out as a future research the management of NN in other recommendation scenarios as group RSs.
KeywordsRecommender systems Natural noise Fuzzy logic Computing with words Group recommender systems
This research work was partially supported by the Research Project TIN2015-66524-P, and the Spanish Ministry of Education, Culture and Sport FPU fellowship (FPU13/01151).
- 3.Amatriain, X., Lathia, N., Pujol, J.M., Kwak, H., Oliver, N.: The wisdom of the few: a collaborative filtering approach based on expert opinions from the web. In: Proceedings of the 32nd International ACM SIGIR Conference, pp. 532–539. ACM, New York (2009)Google Scholar
- 4.Amatriain, X., Pujol, J.M., Oliver, N.: I Like It.. I Like It Not: evaluating user ratings noise in recommender systems. In: Houben, G.-J., McCalla, G., Pianesi, F., Zancanaro, M. (eds.) UMAP 2009. LNCS, vol. 5535, pp. 247–258. Springer, Heidelberg (2009). doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-02247-0_24 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 7.Dellarocas, C.: Immunizing online reputation reporting systems against unfair ratings and discriminatory behavior. In: Proceedings of the 2nd ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce, pp. 150–157. ACM (2000)Google Scholar
- 18.Mobasher, B., Burke, R., Bhaumik, R., Williams, C.: Toward trustworthy recommender systems: an analysis of attack models and algorithm robustness. ACM Trans. Internet Technol. 7(4), Article 23 (2007)Google Scholar
- 20.O’Mahony, M.P., Hurley, N.J., Silvestre, G.: Detecting noise in recommender system databases. In: Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces, pp. 109–115. ACM (2006)Google Scholar
- 23.Pilászy, I., Tikk, D.: Recommending new movies: even a few ratings are more valuable than metadata. In: Proceedings of the third ACM Conference on Recommender Systems, pp. 93–100. ACM (2009)Google Scholar
- 28.Xiao, B., Benbasat, I.: E-commerce product recommendation agents: use, characteristics, and impact. Manage. Inf. Syst. Q. 31(1), 137–209 (2007)Google Scholar