UCAmI 2016: Ubiquitous Computing and Ambient Intelligence pp 481-486 | Cite as
Risk Elicitation for User-Generated Content in Situated Interaction
Abstract
Digital public displays have a unique capability to enable situated shared experiences, especially when open to user-generated content from people in their vicinity. The challenge, however, is how to open public displays to user-generated content, while being able to efficiently support conformity with place and display owner expectations. Sharing the display with users potentiates many risks, which go far beyond the feared appropriation of the display for presenting offensive content. In this study, we conducted a systematic elicitation of the risks involved. Based on a qualitative analysis of moderation situations referred in the literature, we identify and describe 7 specific risks that display owners should manage to be able to support user-generated content.
Notes
Acknowledgments
This research is partially funded by FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia within Project UID/CEC/00319/2013 and by project 11304 (16/SI/2015), supported by Norte Portugal Regional Operational Programme (NORTE 2020), under the PORTUGAL 2020 Partnership Agreement, through the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF).
References
- 1.Davies, N., Langheinrich, M., José, R., Schmidt, A.: Open display networks: a communications medium for the 21st century. Computer 45, 58–64 (2012). (Long. Beach. Calif.)Google Scholar
- 2.Hosio, S., Kukka, H., Riekki, J.: Social surroundings: bridging the virtual and physical divide. IEEE Multimed. 17, 26–33 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 3.Greis, M., Alt, F., Henze, N., Memarovic, N.: I can wait a minute: uncovering the optimal delay time for pre-moderated user-generated content on public displays. In: Proceedings of the Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI 2014), pp. 1435–1438 (2014)Google Scholar
- 4.Elhart, I., Memarovic, N., Langheinrich, M., Rubegni, E.: Control and scheduling interface for public displays. In: Adjunct Proceedings of the International Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing (UbiComp 2013), pp. 51–54 (2013)Google Scholar
- 5.Taylor, N., Cheverst, K., Fitton, D., Race, N.J.P., Rouncefield, M., Graham, C.: Probing communities: study of a village photo display. In: Proceedings of the 19th Australasian conference on Computer-Human Interaction: Entertaining User Interfaces (OzCHI 2007), pp. 17–24 (2007)Google Scholar
- 6.Alt, F., Kubitza, T., Bial, D., Zaidan, F., Ortel, M., Zurmaar, B., Lewen, T., Shirazi, A.S., Schmidt, A.: Digifieds - insights into deploying digital public notice areas in the wild. In: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Mobile Ubiquitous Multimedia, pp. 165–174 (2011)Google Scholar
- 7.Churchill, E.F., Nelson, L., Denoue, L., Murphy, P., Helfman, J.I., Helfma, J.: The plasma poster network: social hypermedia on public display. In: O’Hara, K. (ed.) Public and Situated Displays. Social and Interactional Aspects of Shared Display Technologies, pp. 233–260. Kluwer Academic Publishers, London (2003)Google Scholar
- 8.Storz, O., Friday, A., Davies, N., Finney, J., Sas, C., Sheridan, J.: Public ubiquitous computing systems: lessons from the e-campus display deployments. IEEE Pervasive Comput. 5, 40–47 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 9.José, R., Pinto, H., Silva, B., Melro, A.: Pins and posters: paradigms for content publication on situated displays. IEEE Comput. Graph. Appl. 33, 64–72 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 10.José, R., Otero, N., Izadi, S., Harper, R.: Instant places: using bluetooth for situated interaction in public displays. IEEE Pervasive Comput. 7, 52–57 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar