Modeling and Analyzing Engagement in Social Network Challenges

  • Marco Brambilla
  • Stefano Ceri
  • Chiara Leonardi
  • Andrea Mauri
  • Riccardo Volonterio
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 10041)

Abstract

Participation to challenges within social networks is a very effective instrument for promoting a brand or event. In this paper, we take the challenge organizer’s perspective, and we study how to raise the engagement of players in challenges where the players are stimulated to create and evaluate content, thereby indirectly raising the awareness about the brand or event itself. We illustrate a comprehensive model of the actions and strategies that can be exploited for progressively boosting the social engagement during the challenge evolution. The model studies the organizer-driven management of interactions among players, and evaluates the effectiveness of each action in light of several other factors (time, repetition, third party actions, interplay between different social networks, and so on). We evaluate the model through a set of experiment upon a real case, the YourExpo2015 challenge. Overall, our experiments lasted 9 weeks and mobilized hundreds of thousands of users on two different social platforms; our quantitative analysis assesses the validity of the model.

References

  1. 1.
    Barr, P., Noble, J., Biddle, R.: Video game values: human-computer interaction and games. Interact. Comput. 19(2), 180–195 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Cheng, R., Vassileva, J.: Design and evaluation of an adaptive incentive mechanism for sustained educational online communities. User Model. User-Adapt. Interact. 16(3–4), 321–348 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Cvijikj, I.P., Michahelles, F.: Online engagement factors on facebook brand pages. Soc. Netw. Anal. Min. 3(4), 843–861 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Das, A., Gollapudi, S., Munagala, K.: Modeling opinion dynamics in social networks. In: 7th ACM Conference on Web Search and Data Mining, WSDM 2014, pp. 403–412 (2014)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Deterding, S., Sicart, M., Nacke, L., O’Hara, K., Dixon, D.: Gamification using game-design elements in non-gaming contexts. In: International Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI 2011, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 7–12 May, pp. 2425–2428 (2011)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Dwyer, C.: Digital relationships in the “myspace” generation: results from a qualitative study. In: 40th Hawaii International International Conference on Systems Science (HICSS-40 2007), USA, p. 19 (2007)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Fogg, B.J.: Persuasive technology: using computers to change what we think and do. In: Ubiquity, December 2002Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gao, S., Ma, J., Chen, Z.: Modeling and predicting retweeting dynamics on microblogging platforms. In: 8th ACM Conference on Web Search and Data Mining, WSDM 2015, pp. 107–116 (2015)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Golder, S., Wilkinson, D., Huberman, B.: Rhythms of social interaction: messaging within a massive online network. In: Steinfield, C., Pentland, B., Ackerman, M., Contractor, N. (eds.) Communities and Technologies 2007, pp. 41–66. Springer, London (2007)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kumar, R., Novak, J., Tomkins, A.: Structure and evolution of online social networks. In: 12th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, Philadelphia, PA, pp. 611–617 (2006)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lalmas, M., O’Brien, H., Yom-Tov, E.: Measuring User Engagement. Synthesis Lectures on Information Concepts, Retrieval, and Services. Morgan & Claypool Publishers (2014)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lockton, D., Harrison, D., Stanton, N.A.: The design with intent method: a design tool for influencing user behaviour. Appl. Ergon. 41(3), 382–392 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Milgrom, P., Roberts, J.: Economics, organization and management (1992)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Niebuhr, S., Kerkow, D.: Captivating patterns - a first validation. In: Second International Conference on Persuasive Technology, PERSUASIVE 2007, Palo Alto, CA, USA, pp. 48–54 (2007)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Rashid, A.M., Ling, K.S., Tassone, R.D., Resnick, P., Kraut, R.E., Riedl, J.: Motivating participation by displaying the value of contribution. In: Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI 2006, Montréal, Canada, 22–27 April, pp. 955–958 (2006)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Sato, K., Hashimoto, R., Yoshino, M., Shinkuma, R., Takahashi, T.: Incentive mechanism considering variety of user cost in p2p content sharing. In: IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference (GLOBECOM) 2008, pp. 1–5 (2008)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Scekic, O., Truong, H.L., Dustdar, S.: Incentives and rewarding in social computing. Commun. ACM 56(6), 72–82 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Thom-Santelli, J., Muller, M.J., Millen, D.R.: Social tagging roles: publishers, evangelists, leaders. In: Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI 2008, Florence, Italy, pp. 1041–1044 (2008)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Toriumi, F., Ishida, K., Ishii, K.: Encouragement methods for small social network services. In: 2008 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Web Intelligence, WI 2008, Sydney, pp. 84–90 (2008)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Wasko, M.M., Faraj, S.: Why should I share? examining social capital and knowledge contribution in electronic networks of practice. MIS Q. 29(1), 35–57 (2005)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Wu, S., Sarma, A.D., Fabrikant, A., Lattanzi, S., Tomkins, A.: Arrival and departure dynamics in social networks. In: 6th ACM Conference on Web Search and Data Mining, WSDM 2013, pp. 233–242 (2013)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Yogo, K., Shinkuma, R., Konishi, T., Itaya, S., Doi, S., Yamada, K., Takahashi, T.: Incentive-rewarding mechanism to stimulate activities in social networking services. Int. J. Netw. Manage. 22(1), 1–11 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Marco Brambilla
    • 1
  • Stefano Ceri
    • 1
  • Chiara Leonardi
    • 1
  • Andrea Mauri
    • 1
  • Riccardo Volonterio
    • 1
  1. 1.Dipartimento di Elettronica, Informazione e Bioingegneria (DEIB)Politecnico di MilanoMilanoItaly

Personalised recommendations