On Using Genetic Algorithm for Initialising Semi-supervised Fuzzy c-Means Clustering
In a previous work, suitable initialisation techniques were incorporated with semi-supervised Fuzzy c-Means clustering (ssFCM) to improve clustering results on a trial and error basis. In this work, we present a single fully-automatic version of an existing semi-supervised Fuzzy c-means clustering framework which uses genetically-modified prototypes (ssFCMGA). Initial prototypes are generated by GA to initialise the ssFCM algorithm without experimentation of different initialisation techniques. The framework is tested on a real, biomedical dataset NTBC and on the Arrhythmia UCI dataset, using varying amounts of labelled data from 10 % to 60 % of the total data patterns. Different ssFCM threshold values and fitness functions for ssFCMGA are also investigated (sGAs). We used accuracy and NMI to measure class-label agreement and internal measures WSS, BSS, CH, CWB, DB and DU to evaluate cluster quality of the clustering algorithms. Results are compared with those produced by the existing ssFCM. While ssFCMGA and sGAs produced slightly lower agreement level than ssFCM with known class labels based on accuracy and NMI, the other six measurements showed improvement in the results in terms of compactness and well-separatedness (cluster quality), particularly when labelled data are low at 10 %. Furthermore, the cluster quality are shown to further improve using ssFCMGA with a more complex fitness function (sGA2). This demonstrates the application of GA in ssFCM improves cluster quality without exploration of different initialisation techniques.
KeywordsSemi-supervised Genetic algorithms Fuzzy clustering
This work was supported by the Universiti Brunei Darussalam under Grant UBD/PNC2/2/RG/1(311).
- 2.Tou, J., Gonzales, R.: Pattern Recognition Principles. Addison-Wesley, Reading (1974)Google Scholar
- 5.Lai, D.T.C., Garibaldi, J.M.: Investigating distance metrics in semi-supervised fuzzy c-means for breast cancer classification. In: Peterson, L.E., Masulli, F., Russo, G. (eds.) CIBB 2012. LNCS, vol. 7845, pp. 147–157. Springer, Heidelberg (2013). doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-38342-7_13 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 6.Färber, I., Günnemann, S., Kriegel, H.P., Kröger, P., Müller, E., Schubert, E., Seidl, T., Zimek, A.: On using class-labels in evaluation of clusterings. In: MultiClust: 1st International Workshop on Discovering, Summarizing and Using Multiple Clusterings held in Conjunction with KDD, p. 1 (2010)Google Scholar
- 11.Soria, D., Garibaldi, J.M., Ambrogi, F., Green, A.R., Powe, D., Rakha, E., Macmillan, R.D., Blamey, R.W., Ball, G., Lisboa, P.J., Etchells, T.A., Boracchi, P., Biganzoli, E., Ellis, I.O.: A methodology to identify consensus classes from clustering algorithms applied to immunohistochemical data from breast cancer patients. Comput. Biol. Med. 40(3), 318–330 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar