Advertisement

Ground Penetrating Radar and Mapping the Monastery Complex

  • Francisco M. Fernandes
Chapter
Part of the Mediterranean Perspectives book series (MEPERS)

Abstract

To understand the role of this building very close to a much larger church, it was necessary to confirm the existence of this older and larger monastery. Some signs can be seen on the ground but most of them are underground. Thus, it was necessary to carry out a survey around the Armenian Church to probe the ground to map the foundations of the monastery complex that existed initially. For this, the use of Ground Penetrating Radar was the most appropriate because it allowed a rapid survey of the area around the Church and did not require any excavation. Due to the shallow nature of the underground evidences, 800 and 500 MHz antennas were used. The results showed a rather complex set of mostly rectangular shapes that seem to connect the Armenian Church to the Carmelite Church and which prolong the original building northwest and southeast of the Armenian Church.

Keywords

Ground Penetrating Radar Amplitude Distribution Volumetric Reconstruction Radar Simulation Small Division 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Bibliography

  1. Conyers, Lawrence B. and Dean Goodman. Ground-penetrating radar: An Introduction for Archaeologists. Walnut Creek, California: Altamira Press, 1997.Google Scholar
  2. Daniels, David J. Ground Penetrating Radar, volume 1, 2nd edition. London: IEE, 2004.Google Scholar
  3. Goodman, Dean. “Ground-penetrating radar simulation in engineering and archaeology.” Geophysics 59, no. 2 (1994): 224–232. DOI: 10.1190/1.1443584.Google Scholar
  4. Goodman, Dean and Yasushi Nishimura. “A ground-radar view of Japanese burial mounds.” Antiquity 67 (1993): 349–54.Google Scholar
  5. Núñez-Nieto, X., M. Solla, A. Novo, and H. Lorenzo. “Three-dimensional ground-penetrating radar methodologies for the characterization and volumetric reconstruction of underground tunneling.” Construction and Building Materials 71 (2014): 551–60.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Francisco M. Fernandes
    • 1
  1. 1.ISISE—Institute for Sustainability and Innovation in Structural Engineering; Faculty of Engineering and TechnologiesUniversity Lusíada—NorteVila Nova de FamalicãoPortugal

Personalised recommendations