Educational Creative Use and Reuse of Digital Cultural Heritage Data for Cypriot UNESCO Monuments

  • Marinos Ioannides
  • Pavlos Chatzigrigoriou
  • Vasilis Bokolas
  • Vasiliki Nikolakopoulou
  • Vasilis Athanasiou
  • Eirini Papageorgiou
  • Georgios Leventis
  • Christian Sovis
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 10058)

Abstract

Nowadays, there is a rising demand of reusing the constantly enriched information from heritage digitalization in different ways. One of the objectives of the EU Europeana Space project is the development of a holistic approach for educating people (grown-ups and kids) on Monuments that are listed at UNESCO world heritage list, in Cyprus. The proposed model action is based on the cross cultural approach which, at the same time, responds to the contemporary pedagogical and methodological directions. The system uses innovative digital heritage resources to help the user learn about the different phases of the monument, the history, the architectural value and the conservation stage. The result is a responsive educational platform, where every Monument is a different course and every course is addressed to different age groups. Moreover, part of our future work is the evaluation of the platform by particular groups of our target users.

Keywords

3D models Education Digital heritage Cross-cultural CH data reuse 

Notes

Acknowledgements

1. Europeana Space (http://www.europeana-space.eu/) has received funding from the European Union’s ICT Policy Support Program as part of the Competitiveness and Innovation Framework Program, under GA no. 621037.

2. ITN-DCH (http://www.itn-dch.eu/) project has received funding from the European Union’s Seventh Framework program for research, technological development and demonstration under GA no. 608013.

3. INCEPTION (http://www.inception-project.eu/) has received funding from the EU’s H2020 Reflective framework programme for research and innovation under GA no. 665220.

4. 4DCH (http://www.4d-ch-world.eu/) project has received funding from the European Union’s Seventh Framework program for research, technological development and demonstration.

5. Lo-Cloud (http://www.locloud.eu/) is co-funded under the CIP ICT-PSP program.

6. ViMM (http://www.vi-mm.eu/) has received funding from the EU’s H2020 framework programme for support and coordination actions under GA no. 727107.

References

  1. 1.
    Ott, M., Pozzi, F.: ICT and cultural heritage education: which added value? In: Lytras, M.D., Carroll, J.M., Damiani, E., Tennyson, Robert, D. (eds.) WSKS 2008. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 5288, pp. 131–138. Springer, Heidelberg (2008). doi: 10.1007/978-3-540-87781-3_15 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Stafford, T.: Teaching Visual Literacy in the Primary Classroom: Comic Books, Film, Television and Picture Narratives. Routledge, London (2010)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Song, Y.: “Bring Your Own Device (BYOD)” for seamless science inquiry in a primary school. Comput. Educ. 74, 50–60 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Afreen, R.: Bring Your Own Device (BYOD) in higher education: Opportunities and challenges. Int J Emerg Trends Technol Comput Sci 3, 233–236 (2014)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Alberta Education: Bring your own device: a guide for schools (2012). Accessed 25 June 2012Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Palmer research white paper: best practices for enabling BYOD in education (2013)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bradford Networks: The impact of BYOD in educationGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Yuan, L., Powell, S.: MOOCs and disruptive innovation: implications for higher education. eLearning Pap. In-depth. 33, 1–7 (2013)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Zutshi, S., O’Hare, S., Rodafinos, A.: Experiences in MOOCs: the perspective of students. Am. J. Distance Educ. 27, 218–227 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Styliadis, A.D., Akbaylar, I.I., Papadopoulou, D.A., Hasanagas, N.D., Roussa, S.A., Sexidis, L.A.: Metadata-based heritage sites modeling with e-learning functionality. J. Cult. Heritage 10, 296–312 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Postlethwaite, T.N.: Educational research: some basic concepts and terminology 1. Comp. Educ. 1, 1–55 (2005)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Maslowski, R., Visscher, A.J.: Formative evaluation in educational computing research and development. J. Res. Comput. Educ. 32, 239–255 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Reeves, T.C.: Evaluation of the design and development of IT tools in education. In: Voogt, J., Knezek, G. (eds.) International Handbook of Information Technology in Primary and Secondary Education, pp. 1037–1051. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Pintelas, P., Karatrantou, A., Panagiotakopoulos, C.: The evaluation of educational software and its content. Deukaliοn (2012)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Panagiotakopoulos, C., Pierrakeas, C., Pintelas, P.: The Educational Software and Its Evaluation. Metaichmio Publishing, Athens (2003)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Squires, D.: An heuristic approach to the evaluation of educational multimedia software (1997). http://www.media.uwe.ac.uk/~masoud/cal-97/papers/squires.htm
  17. 17.
    Cohen, L., Manion, L., Morrison, K.: Methodology of Educational Research. Ekfrasi, Athens (1997)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Patton, M.Q.: Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods. SAGE Publications Inc., Newbury Park (1990)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Opie, C.: Research Procedures Doing Educational Research. A Guide to First Time Researchers. Sage Publications, London (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Rubin, H.J., Rubin, I.: Qualitative Interviewing: The Art of Hearing Data. Sage Publication, Thousand Oaks (1995)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Wallen, N.E., Fraenkel, J.R.: Educational Research: A Guide to the Process. Psychology Press, Cambridge (2001)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Mertler, C., Charles, C.: Introduction to Research. Pearson Education Inc., New York (2005)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Litosseliti, L.: Using Focus Groups in Research. A&C Black, London (2003)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Goldenkoff, R.: Using focus groups. In: Wholey, J., Hatry, H., Newcomer, K. (eds.) Handbook of Practical Program Evaluation, pp. 340–362. JosseyBass, San Francisco (2004)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Marinos Ioannides
    • 1
  • Pavlos Chatzigrigoriou
    • 1
  • Vasilis Bokolas
    • 1
  • Vasiliki Nikolakopoulou
    • 1
  • Vasilis Athanasiou
    • 1
  • Eirini Papageorgiou
    • 1
  • Georgios Leventis
    • 1
  • Christian Sovis
    • 2
  1. 1.Cyprus University of TechnologyLimassolCyprus
  2. 2.7ReasonsAbsdorfAustria

Personalised recommendations