Advertisement

Genealogies of Indifference? New Theoretical Thoughts on the History and Creation of Narratives Surrounding Christianity, Secularism and Indifference

  • David NashEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter investigates some of the antecedents of religious indifference through the prism of the religious radicals who initiated the creation of Secularism in Britain. Looking at the difference between the theoretical positions of some individuals, and the practicality of organising antireligious movements, we are enabled to see a mismatch between the desire to stimulate hostility to religion, or to achieve a state of indifference. Both situations, and their implications, made such radicals aware of the important choices at their disposal. The lineage of indifferent positions created by this choice is then investigated in relation to the author’s recent theoretical suggestions about the importance of religious narratives. If we can readily identify religious and secular narratives, is it now possible to identify indifference narratives. If it is possible to do so what precisely are these indifference narratives, and how should they be viewed on a continuum between the religious and the secular? Are they a legitimate third alternative, or merely a space occupied in a snapshot moment between choosing the religious or the secular?

Keywords

Secularism Indifference Holyoake Britain Secular Movement Popular History of Ideas Atheism Agnosticism 

References

  1. Billings, Alan. 2009. God and Community Cohesion: Help or Hindrance? London: SPCK.Google Scholar
  2. Calhoun, C., M. Juergensmeyer, and J. VanAntwerpen. 2011. Introduction. In Rethinking Secularism, ed. C. Calhoun, M. Juergensmeyer, and J. VanAntwerpen, 3–30. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Calhoun, Craig. 2011. Secularism, Citizenship, and the Public Sphere. In Rethinking Secularism, ed. C. Calhoun, M. Juergensmeyer, and J. Van Antwerpen, 75–91. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Casanova, José. 2001. The Secular, Secularizations, Secularisms. In Rethinking Secularism, ed. C. Calhoun, M. Juergensmeyer, and J. Van Antwerpen, 54–74. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Davie, Grace. 1994. Religion in Britain Since 1945: Believing Without Belonging. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
  6. Foote, G.W. 1874. Secularism Restated. London: W. J. Ramsey.Google Scholar
  7. Grant, Brewin. 1853. Christianity and Secularism: Report of a Public Discussion Between the Rev. Brewin Grant… and George Jacob Holyoake … on the Question “What Advantages Would Accrue to Mankind Generally, and the Working Classes in Particular, by the Removal of Christianity, and the Substitution of Secularism in Its Place?”. London: Ward.Google Scholar
  8. Hobson, W.F. 1877. The Ridsdale Judgment on Vestments. An Argument in Error. London: Basil Montagu.Google Scholar
  9. Holyoake, George Jacob. 1852. The Organisation of Freethinkers. London: James Watson.Google Scholar
  10. ———. 1874a. The Limits of Atheism. Or Why Should Sceptics Be Outlaws? London: J.A. Brook and Co.Google Scholar
  11. ———. 1874b. The Logic of Life. Deduced from the Principle of Freethought. London: J.A. Brook & Co.Google Scholar
  12. ———. 1896. The Origin and Nature of Secularism. London: Watts & Co.Google Scholar
  13. Huband Gregg, T. 1877. The Ridsdale Case and the Bennett Judgment. London: Marlborough & Co.Google Scholar
  14. Jones, Norman L. 1984. Elizabeth, Edification, and the Latin Prayer Book of 1560. Church History 53: 174–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Larsen, Timothy. 2007. Crisis of Doubt: Honest Faith in Nineteenth Century England. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  16. McCabe, Joseph. 1908. Life and Letters of George Jacob Holyoake. London: Watts & Co.Google Scholar
  17. Morton, Cole. 2010. Is God Still an Englishman. How We Lost Our Faith (But Found New Soul). London: Little Brown.Google Scholar
  18. Nash, David. 1992. Secularism, Art and Freedom. London: Pinter Press.Google Scholar
  19. ———. 2011. Reassessing the ‘Crisis of Faith’ in the Victorian Age: Eclecticism and the Spirit of Moral Inquiry. Journal of Victorian Culture 1: 83–100.Google Scholar
  20. ———. 2013. Christian Ideals in British Society: Stories of Belief in the Twentieth Century. London: Palgrave MacMillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. New Moral World, 11 July 1839.Google Scholar
  22. Paz, Dennis. 1995. Nineteenth Century English Religious Traditions. West Port: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
  23. Pepinster, Catherine. 2013. God and the Human Person – Faith in the Contemporary World. In Religion, Society and God: Public Theology in Action, ed. Richard Noake and Nicholas Buxton, 98–112. London: SCM Press.Google Scholar
  24. Quack, Johannes, and Cora Schuh. 2017. Contested Indifference. In Religious Indifference: New Perspectives from Studies on Secularization and Nonreligion, ed. Johannes Quack and Cora Schuh. Wiesbaden: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Stepan, Alfred. 2011. The Multiple Secularisms of Modern Democratic and Non-Democratic Regimes. In Rethinking Secularism, ed. C. Calhoun, M. Juergensmeyer, and J. VanAntwerpen, 114–144. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Taylor, Charles. 2011. Western Secularity. In Rethinking Secularism, ed. C. Calhoun, M. Juergensmeyer, and J. Van Antwerpen, 31–53. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Taylor, Jenny. 2015. Religious Illiteracy Is Now Toxic. Publicspirit, University of Bristol. http://publicspirit.org.uk. http://www.publicspirit.org.uk/category/featured-articles/. Accessed 24 Mar 2015.
  28. The Movement and Anti-Persecution Gazette, Volume I Number 1, 16 December 1843; Volume I Number 2, 23 December 1843; Volume I Number 4, 6 January 1844; Volume I Number 11, 24 February 1844.Google Scholar
  29. Verkamp, Bernard. 1977. The Indifferent Mean: Adiaphorism in the English Reformation to 1554. Ohio: University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Whale, John. 1988. The Future of Anglicanism, Mowbray’s Lambeth Series. London: Mowbray.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of History, Religion and PhilosophyOxford Brookes UniversityOxfordUK

Personalised recommendations