New Directions in Spiritual Kinship pp 245-261 | Cite as
The Seeds of Kinship Theory in the Abrahamic Religions
Chapter
First Online:
Abstract
In the Abrahamic religions, Delaney suggests that all kinship is spiritual due to beliefs about procreation found in Jewish, Christian, and Muslim scriptures. The creative power of God is symbolically transferred to men in procreation. The male provides the seed, which encapsulates the soul and identity of a child, while the female is imagined as either fertile or barren, like the earth, that which was created by God. This monogenetic belief generates definitions of “father” and “mother,” patriarchal descent, and gender relations across all three of the Abrahamic religions.
Keywords
Cultural Unit Birth Mother Origin Story Folk Theory Patriarchal Family
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
Bibliography
- Ashley Montagu, M.F. 1937. Coming into Being among the Australian Aborigines. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
- Collier, Jane, and Sylvia Yanagisako. 1989. Gender and Kinship: Toward a Unified Analysis. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
- Delaney, Carol. 1986. The Meaning of Paternity and the Virgin Birth Debate. Man 21(3): 494–513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- ———. 1991. The Seed and the Soil: Gender and Cosmology in Turkish Village Society. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
- ———. 1998. Abraham on Trial: The Social Legacy of Biblical Myth. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
- ———. 2004. Investigating Culture: An Experiential Introduction to Anthropology. Malden: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
- Franklin, Sarah. 1995. Postmodern Procreation: A Cultural Account of Assisted Conception. In Conceiving the New World Order: The Global Politics of Reproduction, ed. Faye D. Ginsburg and Rayna Rapp. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
- ———. 2001. Biologization Revisited: Kinship Theory in the Context of New Biologies. In Relative Values: Reconfiguring Kinship Studies, ed. Sarah Franklin and Susan McKinnon. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
- Howell, Signe. 2001. Self-Conscious Kinship: Some Contested Values in Norwegian Transnational Adoption. In Relative Values: Reconfiguring Kinship Studies, ed. Sarah Franklin and Susan McKinnon. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
- Leach, Edmund. 1967. Virgin Birth. In Proceedings of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 39–49. Google Scholar
- Malinowski, Bronislaw. 1927. The Father in Primitive Society. London: Kegan, Paul, Trench and Trubner.Google Scholar
- ———. [1929] 1932. The Sexual Life of Savages in North-Western Melanesia. London: George Routledge and Sons, Ltd.Google Scholar
- ———. [1916] 1954. Baloma: Spirits of the Dead in the Trobriand Islands. In Magic, Science and Religion. New York: Doubleday Anchor BooksGoogle Scholar
- McLennan, J.F. 1896. Studies in Ancient History. London: Macmillan and Company.Google Scholar
- Meeker, Michael. 1970. The Black Sea Turks: A Study of Honor, Descent and Marriage. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Chicago.Google Scholar
- Morgan, Lewis Henry. 1871. Systems of Consanguinity and Affinity in the Human Family, Smithsonian Contributions to Knowledge No. 17. Washington, DC: Smithsonian.Google Scholar
- Rapp, Rayna, Deborah Heath, and Karen-Sue Taussig. 2001. Genealogical Dis-Ease: Where Hereditary Abnormality, Biomedical Explanation and Family Responsibility Meet. In Relative Values: Reconfiguring Kinship Studies, ed. Sarah Franklin and Susan McKinnon. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
- Schneider, David. 1968. American Kinship: A Cultural Account. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall, Inc.Google Scholar
- ———. 1972. What Is Kinship All About? In Kinship Studies in the Morgan Centennial Year, ed. P. Reining, 32–63. Washington, DC: The Anthropological Society.Google Scholar
- Weston, Kath. 1990. Families We Choose: Lesbians, Gays, Kinship. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Copyright information
© The Author(s) 2017