Light Metals 2015 pp 1219-1223 | Cite as

Effect of Casting Parameters on Microstructure, Recrystallization Behaviour and Final Material Properties of Twin-Roll Cast 1050 Alloy

  • Cemil Işıksaçan
  • Onur Meydanoğlu
  • Vakur Uğur Akdoğan
  • Gökhan Alper
  • Barış Beyhan

Abstract

Aluminium alloys produced by twin-roll casting exhibit inherently existing features due to distinctive solidification behaviour encountered during casting. Contrary to fine intermetallic particles observed at the outermost surface, centerline segregations enriched in solute elements reside at the mid-plane of cross-section. These morphological and compositional discrepancies are affected by casting parameters and resultant heat extraction due to separating force exerted by solidifying metal. In that respect, materials produced with different set of casting parameters were exposed to different thermo-mechanical processes to elucidate recrystallization and grain-growth behaviour inherited by initial as-cast microstructure. Microstructures were investigated by employing metallographic techniques throughout downstream processes. Complementary studies were performed by electrical conductivity measurements, tensile tests, micro-hardness tests and corrosion tests. Results show that microstructural properties of as-cast sheet can be tailored with defined combination of casting parameters. This also results in different material properties to evolve as they are exposed further annealing and rolling operations.

Keywords

Twin-roll casting separating force centerline segregation recrystallization 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    Ch. Gras, M. Meredith, J.D. Hunt, “Microdefects formation during the twin-roll casting of Al–Mg–Mn aluminium alloys,” Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 167 (2005), 62–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    M. Yun, S. Lokyer, J.D. Hunt, “Twin roll casting of aluminium alloys,” Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 280 (2000), 116–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    O. Keles, M. Dundar, “Aluminium foil: Its typical quality problems and their causes,” Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 186 (1–3) (2007), 125–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    T. Haga, K. Tkahashi, M. Ikawaand, H. Watarii “Twin roll casting of aluminium alloy strips,” Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 153–154 (2004), 42–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    C.A. Santos, J.A. Spim, “Modeling of solidification in twin roll strip casting,” Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 102 (1–3) 2000, 33–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    M. Dündar, M. Günyüz, C. Işıksaçan, A. Pastırmacı, “Effect of Zn Content and Process Parameters on Corrosion Behaviour of Twin-Roll Cast Aluminum Brazing Alloys,” Light Metals, ed. B.A. Sadler (Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2013), 361–364.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© TMS (The Minerals, Metals & Materials Society) 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Cemil Işıksaçan
    • 1
  • Onur Meydanoğlu
    • 1
  • Vakur Uğur Akdoğan
    • 1
  • Gökhan Alper
    • 1
  • Barış Beyhan
    • 1
  1. 1.ASSAN Alüminyum A.Ş.Yayla Mah.Tuzla, IstanbulTurkey

Personalised recommendations