A Machine Learning Model for Occupancy Rates and Demand Forecasting in the Hospitality Industry

  • William Caicedo-TorresEmail author
  • Fabián Payares
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 10022)


Occupancy rate forecasting is a very important step in the decision-making process of hotel planners and managers. Popular strategies as Revenue Management feature forecasting as a vital activity for dynamic pricing, and without accurate forecasting, errors in pricing will negatively impact hotel financial performance. However, having accurate enough forecasts is no simple task for a wealth of reasons, as the inherent variability of the market, lack of personnel with statistical skills, and the high cost of specialized software. In this paper, several machine learning techniques were surveyed in order to construct models to forecast daily occupancy rates for a hotel, given historical records of bookings and occupation. Several approaches related to dataset construction and model validation are discussed. The results obtained in terms of the Mean Absolute Percentage Error (MAPE) are promising, and support the use of machine learning models as a tool to help solve the problem of occupancy rates and demand forecasting.


Machine learning Forecasting Hotel occupancy Demand Neural Networks Ridge Regression Kernel Ridge Regression 


  1. 1.
    Thomas rückstieß rbf network implementation. Accessed 04 May 2016
  2. 2.
    Albanese, D., Visintainer, R., Merler, S., Riccadonna, S., Jurman, G., Furlanello, C.: mlpy: Machine learning python (2012)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Andrew, W.P., Cranage, D.A., Lee, C.K.: Forecasting hotel occupancy rates with time series models: an empirical analysis. J. Hospitality Tourism Res. 14(2), 173–182 (1990). Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bochkanov, S.: ALGLIB. Accessed 26 Apr 2016
  5. 5.
    Broomhead, D., Lowe, D.: Multivariable functional interpolation and adaptive networks. Complex Syst. 2, 321–355 (1988)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Cortes, C., Vapnik, V.: Support-vector networks. Mach. Learn. 20(3), 273–297 (1995). zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    El-Gayar, N., Hendawi, A., Zakhary, A., El-Shishiny, H.: A proposed decision support model for hotel room revenue management. ICGST Int. J. Artif. Intell. Mach. Learn. 8(1), 23–28 (2008)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gilliland, M., Sglavo, U., Tashman, L.: Business Forecasting: Practical Problems and Solutions. Wiley, Hoboken (2016)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hoerl, A.E., Kennard, R.W.: Ridge regression: biased estimation for nonorthogonal problems. Technometrics 42(1), 80–86 (2000). MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Law, R., Au, N.: A neural network model to forecast Japanese demand for travel to Hong Kong. Tourism Manag. 20(1), 89–97 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lee, A.O.: Airline reservations forecasting: probabilistic and statistical models of the booking process. Ph.D. thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA (1990)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Murphy, K.P.: Machine Learning: A Probabilistic Perspective. The MIT Press, Cambridge (2012)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Phumchusri, N., Mongkolku, P.: Hotel room demand forecasting via observed reservation information. In: Kachitvichyanukul, V., Luong, H., Pitakaso, R. (eds.) Proceedings of the Asia Pacific Industrial Engineering & Management Systems Conference, pp. 1978–1985 (2012)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Rajopadhye, M., Ghalia, M.B., Wang, P.P., Baker, T., Eister, C.V.: Forecasting uncertain hotel room demand. Inf. Sci. 132(1–4), 1–11 (2001).–7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Rumelhart, D.E., Hinton, G.E., Williams, R.J.: Learning internal representations by error propagation. In: Parallel Distributed Processing: Explorations in the Microstructure of Cognition, vol. 1, pp. 318–362. MIT Press, Cambridge (1986).
  16. 16.
    Weatherford, L.R., Kimes, S.E.: A comparison of forecasting methods for hotel revenue management. Int. J. Forecast. 19(3), 401–415 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Zakhary, A., El Gayar, N., Atiya, A.F.: A comparative study of the pickup method and its variations using a simulated hotel reservation data. ICGST Int. J. Artif. Intell. Mach. Learn. 8, 15–21 (2008)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Computer ScienceUniversidad Tecnológica de BolívarCartagenaColombia

Personalised recommendations