Advertisement

Challenges to the Implementation of Dual Apprenticenships in OECD Countries: A Literature Review

  • Oscar ValienteEmail author
  • Rosario Scandurra
Chapter
Part of the Technical and Vocational Education and Training: Issues, Concerns and Prospects book series (TVET, volume 24)

Abstract

The good economic performance and low levels of youth unemployment in countries with dual vocational education and training (VET) systems have provided good arguments to the advocates of dual apprenticeships as a global role model. Many governments in the Global North have started to show great interest in adopting dual apprenticeships in their own national contexts with the aim of improving the employability of young adults and smoothening transitions from education to work. However, evaluation studies have demonstrated that the transfer of these international good practices to different local contexts is quite problematic, making necessary to understand how different designs of dual apprenticeship programmes interact with the social and economic contexts in which they are implemented, and how social actors react to these interventions. This literature review has systematised international evidence on some of the challenges and dilemmas that governments in OECD countries face when they want to implement large-scale dual apprenticeship programmes. We suggest that the main challenge they face is to make dual apprenticeships attractive to both employers and students. We conclude that the difficulty of reconciling these two goals is one of the main reasons for most of these interventions to remain as small-scale innovations and not reaching the systemic level.

Keywords

Labour Market OECD Country Social Partner Youth Unemployment Apprenticeship Programme 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Abdel-Wahab, M. (2012). Rethinking apprenticeship training in the British construction industry. Journal of Vocational Education & Training, 64(2), 145–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Acemoglu, D., & Pischke, J. (1998). Why do firms train? Theory and evidence. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 113(1), 79–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Arthur, J., Waring, M., Coe, R., & Hedges, L. V. (2012). Research methods and methodologies in education. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  4. Askilden, J. E., & Nilsen, O. A. (2005). Apprentices and young workers: A study of the Norwegian youth labour market. Scottish Journal of Political Economy, 52(1), 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Barabasch, A., Huang, S., & Lawson, R. (2009). Planned policy transfer: The impact of the German model on Chinese vocational education. Compare, 39(1), 5–20.Google Scholar
  6. Bassanini, A., & Brunello, G. (2008). Is training more frequent when the wage premium is smaller? Evidence from the European Community Household Panel. Labour Economics, 15(2), 272–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Behrens, M., Pilz, M., & Greuling, O. (2008). Taking a straightforward detour: Learning and labour market participation in the German apprenticeship system. Journal of Vocational Education & Training, 60(1), 93–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Blossfeld, H., & Stockmann, R. (1998). The German dual system in comparative perspective. International Journal of Sociology, 28(4), 3–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bol, T., & van de Werfhorst, H. G. (2013). Educational systems and the trade-off between labor market allocation and equality of educational opportunity. Comparative Education Review, 57(2), 285–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bosch, G., & Charest, J. (2008). Vocational training and the labour market in liberal and coordinated economies. Industrial Relations Journal, 39(5), 428–447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Brockmann, M., Claeke, L., & Winch, C. (2010). The apprenticeship framework in England: A new beginning or a continuing sham? Journal of Education and Work, 23(2), 111–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Brunello, G. (2009). The effect of economic downturns on apprenticeships and initial workplace training: A review of the evidence, Discussion paper series no. 4326. Bonn: IZA.Google Scholar
  13. Burt, R. S., Cook, K. S., & Lin, N. (2001). Social capital: theory and research. Piscataway: Aldine Transaction.Google Scholar
  14. Busemeyer, M. (2009). From myth to reality: Globalisation and public spending in OECD countries revisited. European Journal of Political Research, 48, 455–482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Christopoulou, R., & Ryan, P. (2009). Youth outcomes in the labour markets of advanced economies: Decline, deterioration and causes. In I. Schoon & R. Silberstein (Eds.), Transitions from school to work: Globalization, individualization, and patterns of diversity (pp. 67–94). New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Collins, H., & Evans, R. (2007). Rethinking expertise. London: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Culpepper, P. D. (2007). Small states and skill specificity: Austria, Switzerland, and inter-employer cleavages in coordinated capitalism. Comparative Political Studies, 40(6), 611–637.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Culpepper, P. D., & Thelen, K. (2008). Institutions and collective actors in the provision of training: Historical and cross-national comparisons. In K. U. Mayer & H. Solga (Eds.), Skill formation: Interdisciplinary and cross-national perspectives (pp. 21–49). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. D’Agostino, S., De Angelis, E., & Deitmer, L. (2010). Italian apprenticeship reform: Impact from national and regional perspectives. In F. Rauner & E. Smith (Eds.), Rediscovering apprenticeship, technical and vocational education and training: Issues, concerns and prospects (pp. 59–73). London/New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Estevez-Abe, M., Iversen, T., & Soskice, D. (2001). Social protection and the formation of skills: A reinterpretation of the welfare states. In P. A. Hall (Ed.), Varieties of capitalism: The institutional foundations of comparative advantage. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Filliettaz, L. (2011). Collective guidance at work: A resource for apprentices? Journal of Vocational Education & Training, 63(3), 485–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Flude, M., & Sieminski, S. (1999). Education, training and the future of work: Developments in Vocational Education and Training. London/New York: The Open University/Routledge.Google Scholar
  23. Flyvbjerg, B. (2001). Making social science matter: Why social inquiry fails and how it can succeed again. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Fuller, A., & Unwin, L. (2003). Fostering workplace learning: Looking through the lens of apprenticeship. European Educational Research Journal, 2(1), 41–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Gough, D., Oliver, S., & Thomas, J. (2012). An introduction to systematic reviews. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  26. Granovetter, M. S. (1995). Getting a job: A study of contacts and careers. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  27. Green, A., Preston, J., & Janmaat, J. G. (2006). Education, equality and social cohesion: A comparative analysis. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Guile, D., & Okumoto, K. (2007). ‘We are trying to reproduce a crafts apprenticeship’: From Government Blueprint to workplace-generated apprenticeship in the knowledge economy. Journal of Vocational Education & Training, 59(4), 551–574.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hall, P., & Soskice, D. (2001). Varieties of capitalism: the institutional foundations of comparative advantage. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Halpin, D., & Troyna, B. (1995). The politics of education policy borrowing. Comparative Education, 31(3), 303–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Heinz, W. R. (2000). Youth transitions and employment in Germany. International Social Science Journal, 52(164), 161–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Heinz, W. R. (2002). Transition discontinuities and the biographical shaping of early work careers. Journal of Vocational Behaviour, 60(2), 220–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hoeckel, K., & Schwartz, R. (2010). OECD reviews of vocational education and training: A learning for jobs review of Germany 2010. Paris: OECD Publishing.Google Scholar
  34. Hogarth, T., Gambin, L., & Hasluck, C. (2012). Apprenticeships in England: What next? Journal of Vocational Education & Training, 64(1), 41–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. ILO. (2012). Overview of apprenticeship systems and issues: ILO Contribution to the G20 Task Force on Employment. http://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/---ed_emp/---ifp_skills/documents/genericdocument/wcms_190188.pdf. Accessed 20 Jun 2012.
  36. Juul, I., & Jørgensen, C. H. (2011). Challenges for the dual system and occupational self-governance in Denmark. Journal of Vocational Education & Training, 63(3), 289–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Kammermann, M., Stalder, B., & Achim, H. (2011). Two-year apprenticeships – a successful model of training? Journal of Vocational Education and Training, 63(3), 377–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Lehmann, W. (2000). Is Germany’s dual system still a model for Canadian youth apprenticeship initiatives? Canadian Public Policy, 26(2), 225–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Maurer, M., & Gonon, P. (Eds.). (2014). The challenges of policy transfer in vocational skills development: National qualifications frameworks and the dual model of vocational training in vocational and continuing education. Bern: Lang.Google Scholar
  40. Moss, G. (2013). Research, policy and knowledge flows in education: What counts in knowledge mobilisation? Contemporary Social Science: Journal of the Academy of Social Sciences, 8(3), 237–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. O’Connor, L. (2006). Meeting the skills needs of a buoyant economy: Apprenticeship – the Irish experience. Journal of Vocational Education & Training, 58(1), 31–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Oakley, A. (2012). Foreword. In D. Gough, S. Oliver, & J. Thomas (Eds.), An introduction to systematic reviews (pp. 7–10). London: Sage.Google Scholar
  43. OECD. (2010). Workplace learning. In OECD (Ed.), Learning for jobs. Paris: OECD Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Onstenk, J., & Blokhuis, F. (2007). Apprenticeship in The Netherlands: Connecting school- and work-based learning. Education and Training, 49(6), 489–499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Ozga, J., & Jones, R. (2006). Travelling and embedded policy: The case of knowledge transfer. Journal of Education Policy, 21(1), 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Pawson, R. (2001). Realist synthesis: supplementary reading 5: The promise of realist synthesis. https://www.leeds.ac.uk/realistsynthesis/Supread4.doc. Accessed 17 Jul 2012.
  47. Pawson, R., & Tilley, N. (1997). Realist evaluation. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  48. Pilz, M. (2012). Modularisation of vocational training in Germany, Austria and Switzerland: Parallels and disparities in a modernisation process. Journal of Vocational Education & Training, 64(2), 169–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Räkköläinen, M., & Työssäoppimisen, O. (2001). Guidance of work-related learning. In M. Räkköläinen & I. Uusitalo (Eds.), Työssäoppiminen ja ohjaus ammatillisissa oppilaitoksissa (pp. 103–135). Helsinki: Tammi.Google Scholar
  50. Ryan, P. (2000). The institutional requirements of apprenticeship: Evidence from smaller EU countries. International Journal of Training and Development, 4(1), 42–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Ryan, P. (2001). The school-to-work transition: A cross-national perspective. Journal of Economic Literature, 39(1), 34–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Ryan, P., Gospel, H., & Lewis, P. (2006). Educational and contractual attributes of the apprenticeship programmes of large employers in Britain. Journal of Vocational Education & Training, 58(3), 359–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Sandelowski, M., Voils, C., Leeman, J., & Crandell, J. (2012). Mapping the mixed methods – mixed research synthesis terrain. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 6(4), 317–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Soskice, D. (1994). The German training system: Reconciling markets and institutions. In L. Lynch (Ed.), Training and the private sector: international comparisons. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  55. Smith, R., & Betts, M. (2000). Learning as partners: Realising the potential of work-based learning. Journal of Vocational Education and Training, 52(4), 589–604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Smith, E., Comyn, P., Emmis, R., & Smith, A. (2011). Australian employers’ adoption of traineeships. Journal of Vocational Education & Training, 63(3), 363–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Steedman, H. (2010). The state of apprenticeship in 2010: International comparisons. London: Centre for Economic Performance (CEP). http://cep.lse.ac.uk/pubs/download/special/cepsp22.pdf. Accessed 11 May 2016.
  58. Stockmann, R. (1997). The sustainability of development projects: An impact assessment of German vocational-training projects in Latin America. World Development, 25(11), 1767–1784.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Stockmann, R. (1999). The implementation of dual vocational training structures in developing countries: An evaluation of ‘Dual Projects’ assisted by the German Agency for Technical Cooperation. International Journal of Sociology, 29(2), 29–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Strauss, A. (1987). Qualitative analysis for social scientists. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Taylor, A., & Freeman, S. (2011). ‘Made in the trade’: Youth attitudes toward apprenticeship certification. Journal of Vocational Education & Training, 63(3), 345–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Twigg, B. (2012). Semta: Higher apprenticeship in advanced manufacturing and engineering: meeting the higher level skills challenge. Higher Education, Skills and Work-based Learning, 2(3), 298–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Tynjälä, P. (2005). Integrative pedagogies: Learning in real life situations. A keynote address presented at ENPHE NUF conference, Enhancing physiotherapy competencies in innovative learning environments. Helsinki, 6–8 Oct 2005.Google Scholar
  64. Tynjälä, P., Välimaa, J., & Sarja, A. (2003). Pedagogical perspectives on the relationship between higher education and working life. Higher Education, 46, 147–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Verger, A., Novelli, M., & Altinyelken, H. K. (2012). Global education policy and international development: An introductory framework. In A. Verger, M. Novelli, & H. K. Altinyelken (Eds.), Global education policy and international development: New agendas, issues and policies (pp. 3–32). Huntingdon: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
  66. Vickerstaff, S. (2007). ‘I was just the boy around the place’: What made apprenticeships successful? Journal of Vocational Education & Training, 59(3), 331–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Virtanen, A., & Tynjälä, P. (2008). Students’ experiences of workplace learning in Finnish VET. European journal of vocational training, 44(2), 199–213.Google Scholar
  68. Walden, G., & Troltsch, K. (2011). Apprenticeship training in Germany: Still a future-oriented model for recruiting skilled workers? Journal of Vocational Education & Training, 63(3), 305–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Wolf, A. (2011). Review of vocational education. The Wolf report. London: Department of Education. https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/180504/DFE-00031-2011.pdf. Accessed 10 Jun 2014.
  70. Wolter, S. C., & Ryan, P. (2011). Apprenticeship. In E. A. Hanushek, S. Machin, & L. Woessmann (Eds.), Handbook of the economics of education (pp. 521–576). Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Robert Owen Centre for Educational ChangeUniversity of GlasgowGlasgowUK
  2. 2.Department of Sociology and Organizational AnalysisUniversity of BarcelonaBarcelonaSpain

Personalised recommendations