Efficient Anomaly Detection System for Video Surveillance Application in WVSN with Particle Swarm Optimization

Chapter
First Online:
Part of the Studies in Computational Intelligence book series (SCI, volume 676)

Abstract

Wireless sensor networks consist of several tiny low cost sensor nodes that are deployed for many applications such as military, civil, industrial, healthcare, home automation, etc. Recent technological developments have enabled the use of wireless visual sensor networks (WVSNs) for sensitive applications such as video surveillance and monitoring applications. Limited memory, energy and bandwidth are the major constraints in WVSN that can be simplified by the use of compressed sensing (CS), which asserts that sparse signals can be reconstructed from very few measurements. CS a computational intelligence solution is about acquiring and recovering the signal in the most efficient manner possible using incoherent projection basis. In the case of video surveillance applications, the entire video may not be useful hence, with the help of efficient algorithms the presence of the anomalies can be detected and transmitted to help user at the monitoring site to take necessary action. In this chapter, particle swarm optimization (PSO) based efficient anomaly detection system (EADS) is proposed which will detect the presence of anomalies and transmit the required measurements via TelosB nodes to the network operator. This system adopts the concept of CS to obtain the compressive measurements so that the object detection algorithm can be applied to the measurements rather than samples. PSO is employed for optimizing compressive measurements while a mean based measurement differencing approach is used for detecting the object. This proposed efficient system has the intelligence of detecting targets with fewer measurements and transmit the required compressive measurements for reconstruction with less energy, thereby increasing the network lifetime. PSO is used to optimize the transmission distance with minimum number of hops towards destination, to achieve reduced energy consumption. However, the lifetime of the network is still bounded by batteries, the sole source of energy in WVSNs. Alternative energy utilization can be effectively included to recharge the batteries on-board and extend the lifetime of the network. Solar energy harvesting forms an effective resource due to its ambient presence. Hence, solar energy harvester is incorporated in the proposed EADS to extend its lifetime.

Keywords

WVSN Compressed sensing PSO Solar harvester Network lifetime Video surveillance 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. 1.
    Ye, Y., et al.: Wireless video surveillance: a survey. IEEE Access 1, 646–660 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Baraniuk, R.: A lecture compressive sensing. IEEE Signal Process. Mag. 24(4), 118–121 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Candes, E.J.: Compressive sampling. In: Proceedings of the International Congress of Mathematicians. European Mathematical Society, Madrid (2006)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hemalatha, R., Radha, S., Sudharsan, S.: Energy-efficient image transmission in wireless multimedia sensor networks using block-based. Compress. Sens. Comput. Electr. Eng. 44, 67–79 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Aasha Nandhini, S., et al.: Video compressed sensing framework for wireless multimedia sensor networks using a combination of multiple matrices. Comput. Electr. Eng. 44, 51–66 (2015). doi: 10.1016/j.compeleceng.2015.02.008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Wang, Q., Liu, Z.: A robust and efficient algorithm for distributed compressed sensing. Comput. Electr. Eng. 37(6), 916–926 (2011)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lei, J.: Generalized reconstruction algorithm for compressed sensing. Comput. Electr. Eng. 37(4), 570–588 (2011)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hassanien, A.-E., Abraham, A. (eds.): Computational Intelligence in Multimedia Processing: Recent Advances, vol. 96. Springer, Berlin (2008)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kulkarni, R.V., Forster, A., Venayagamoorthy, G.K.: Computational intelligence in wireless sensor networks: a survey. IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutor. 13(1), 68–96 (2011). (First Quarter)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Mendis, C., Guru, S.M., Halgamuge, S., Fernando, S.: Optimized sink node path using particle swarm optimization. In: Advanced Information Networking and Applications, 2006. AINA 2006. 20th International Conference on, vol. 2(5), pp. 18–20 (2006). doi: 10.1109/AINA.2006.254
  11. 11.
    Ngatchou, P.N., Fox, W.L.J., El-Sharkawi, M.: Distributed sensor placement with sequential particle swarm optimization. In: IEEE Proceedings on Swarm Intelligence Symposium, SIS (2005)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Salas, V., Barrado, A., Lazaro, A.: Review of the maximum power point tracking algorithms for stand-alone photovoltaic systems. Solar Energy Mater. Solar Cells 90, 1555–1578 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Sarvi, M., Ahmadi, S., Abdi, S.: A PSO-based maximum power point tracking for photovoltaic systems under environmental and partially shaded conditions. Prog. Photovolt. Res. Appl. 23(2), 201–214 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Abdulkadir, M., Yatim, A.H.M., Yusuf, S.T.: An improved PSO-based MPPT control strategy for photovoltaic systems. Int. J. Photoenergy (2014), Article ID 818232Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Joseph, P., Robert, S., David, C.: Telos: enabling ultra-low power wireless research. In: Proceedings of 4th International Symposium on information Processing in Sensor Networks, Los Angeles, CA, pp. 364–369 (2005)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Yi, Z., Liangzhong, F.: Moving object detection based on running average background and temporal difference. In: International Conference on Intelligent Systems and Knowledge Engineering (ISKE), pp. 270–272. IEEE (2010)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Cevher, V., Sankaranarayanan, A., Duarte, M.F., Reddy, D., Baraniuk, R.G., Chellappa, R.: Compressive sensing for background subtraction. In: Computer Vision—ECCV 2008, pp. 155–168. Springer, Berlin (2008)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Chen, S., Donoho, D.: Basis pursuit. In: Signals, Systems and Computers. 1994 Conference Record of the Twenty-Eighth Asilomar Conference on, vol. 1. IEEE (1994)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Tropp, J., Gilbert, A.: Signal recovery from partial information via orthogonal matching pursuit. IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 53(12), 4655–4666 (2007)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Blumensath, T., Davies, M.E.: Iterative hard thresholding for compressed sensing. Appl. Comput. Harmonic Anal. 27(3), 265–274 (2009)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Needell, D., Tropp, J.A.: CoSaMP: iterative signal recovery from incomplete and inaccurate samples. Appl. Comput. Harmonic Anal. 26(3), 301–321 (2009)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Chartrand, R., Yin, W.: Iteratively reweighted algorithms for compressive sensing. In: Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing, 2008. ICASSP 2008. IEEE International Conference on, pp. 3869–3872. IEEE (2008)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Haupt, R.L., Haupt, S.E.: Practical Genetic Algorithms. Wiley, New York (2004)MATHGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Jeyakumar, D.N., Jayabarathi, T., Raghunathan, T.: Particle swarm optimization for various types of economic dispatch problems. Int. J. Electr. Power Energy Syst. 28(1), 36–42 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Yang, S., Zhu, W., Chen, L.: Particle swarm learning algorithm based on adjustment of parameter and its applications assessment of agricultural projects. In: Computer and Computing Technologies in Agriculture II, vol. 2, pp. 1379–1388. Springer, Berlin (2008)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Zhang, J., Wang, B., Zhang, X., Huang, D.S., Zhang, X., Reyes García, C., Zhang, L.: Advanced Intelligent Computing Theories and Applications. Springer, Berlin (2010)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Mini, S., Udgata, S.K., Sabat, S.L.: Sensor deployment and scheduling for target coverage problem in wireless sensor networks. IEEE Sens. J. 14(3), 636–644 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Eberhart, R.C., Kennedy, J.: A new optimizer using particle swarm theory. In: Proceedings of the Sixth International Symposium on Micro Machine and Human Science, pp. 39–43 (1995)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Walker, G.: Evaluating MPPT converter topologies using a Matlab PV model. J. Electr. Electron. Eng. 21(1), 49–56 (2001)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Tremblay, O., Dessaint, L.A.: Experimental validation of a battery dynamic model for EV applications. World Electric Veh. J. 3, 1–10 (2009)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
  32. 32.
    ‘ContikiOS’, http://www.contiki-os.org
  33. 33.
  34. 34.
    Cao, Y., Lei, Z., Huang, X., Zhang, Z., Zhong, T.: A vehicle detection algorithm based on compressive sensing and background subtraction. AASRI Proc. 1, 480–485 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Smitha, H., Palanisamy, V.. Detection of stationary foreground objects in region of interest from traffic video sequences. Int. J. Comput. Sci. Issues (IJCSI) 9(2) (2012)Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Dunkels, A., Eriksson, J., Finne, N., Tsiftes, N.: Powertrace: Network-Level Power Profiling for Lowpower Wireless Networks, Technical Report T2011:05. SICS (2011)Google Scholar
  37. 37.
  38. 38.
    Huaming, W., Alhussein, A.A.: Energy efficient distributed image compression in resource constrained multihop wireless networks. Comput. Commun. 28, 1658–1668 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of ECESSN College of EngineeringKalavakkam, ChennaiIndia

Personalised recommendations