Advertisement

Thinking Outside the Box: Co-planning Scientific Presentations with Virtual Agents

Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 10011)

Abstract

Oral presentations are central to scientific communication, yet the quality of many scientific presentations is poor. To improve presentation quality, scientists need to invest greater effort in the creative design of presentation content. We present AceTalk, a presentation planning system supported by a virtual assistant. This assistant motivates and collaborates with users in a structured brainstorming process to explore engaging presentation structures and content types. Our study of AceTalk demonstrates the potential of human-agent collaboration to facilitate the design of audience-centered presentations, while highlighting the need for rich modelling of audiences, presenters and talk contexts.

Keywords

Presentation planning Embodied conversational agents Scientific presentations Slideware Powerpoint Collaboration Creativity support 

Notes

Acknowledgement

This work is supported in part by the National Science Foundation under award IIS-1514490. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.

References

  1. 1.
    Abela, A.: Advanced Presentations by Design: Creating Communication that Drives Action. Wiley, Hoboken (2008)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Braun, V., Clarke, V.: Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual. Res. Psychol. 3(2), 77–101 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Cassell, J., Vilhjálmsson, H. H., Bickmore, T.: BEAT: The Behavior Expression Animation Toolkit. In: SIGGRAPH ‘01, 477–486 (2001)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Duarte, N.: Resonate: Presenting Visual Stories that Transform Audiences. Wiley, New York (2010)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Goodman, A.: Why Bad Presentations Happen to Good Causes, and How to Ensure They Won’t Happen to Yours. Cause Communications, Los Angeles (2006)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    McCroskey, J.C., McCroskey, L.L.: Self-report as an approach to measuring communication competence. Commun. Res. Rep. 5, 108–113 (1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Miller, W., Rollnick, S.: Motivational Interviewing, Second Edition: Preparing People for Change. The Guilford Press, New York (2002)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Nye, B.D., Graesser, A.C., Hu, X.: AutoTutor and family: a review of 17 years of natural language tutoring. Int. J. Artif. Intell. Educ. 24(4), 427–469 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Paul, G.L.: Insight and Desensitization in Psychotherapy: An Experiment in Anxiety Reduction. Stanford University Press, Stanford (1966)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Paulus, P.: Groups, teams, and creativity: the creative potential of idea-generating groups. Appl. Psychol. Int. Rev. 49, 237–262 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Pschetz, L., Yatani, K., Edge, D.: TurningPoint: narrative-driven presentation planning. In: CHI 2014, pp. 1591–1594 (2014)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Schroeder, N.L., Adesope, O.O., Gillbert, R.B.: How effective are pedagogical agents for learning? a meta-analytic review. J. Educ. Comput. Res. 46(1), 1–39 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Schroeder, N.L., Adesope, O.O.: A systematic review of pedagogical agents’ persona, motivation, and cognitive load implications for learners. J. Res. Technol. Educ. 46(3), 229–251 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Spielberger, C.D.: State-trait Anxiety Inventory: Bibliography, 2nd edn. Consulting Psychologists Press, Palo Alto (1989)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Trinh, H., Ring, L., Bickmore, T.: DynamicDuo: co-presenting with virtual agents. In: CHI 2015, pp. 1739–1748 (2015)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Trinh, H., Yatani, K. Edge, D.: Pitchperfect: integrated rehearsal environment for structured presentation preparation. In: CHI 2014, pp. 1571–1580 (2014)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Wang, H., Rosé, C.P., Chang, C.: Agent-based dynamic support for learning from collaborative brainstorming in scientific inquiry. Int. J. Comput.-Support. Collaborative Learn. 6(3), 371–395 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Weissman, J.: Presenting to Win: The Art of Telling Your Story. FT Press, Upper Saddle River (2009)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.College of Computer and Information ScienceNortheastern UniversityBostonUSA
  2. 2.Microsoft Research CambridgeCambridgeUK

Personalised recommendations