Simplifying Documentation of Digital Reconstruction Processes

Introducing an Interactive Documentation System
  • Jonas Bruschke
  • Markus Wacker
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 10025)


Digital reconstruction is becoming ever more common in archaeology, architecture and other disciplines. Lost, but also present structures are being visualized to enhance the understanding of a reconstructed object and point out historical and constructional relationships of the objects under consideration. Furthermore, the process of reconstruction leads to an aggregation of knowledge, becoming a substantial part of historical research. However, such projects usually lack a proper, traceable, rigorously applied – therefore valuable – documentation practice. In the final reconstruction of the object the references to its sources may only be known to the experts involved in the project. Those not involved in the reconstruction project may not be able to understand this relationship. Research into documentation practice has until now typically concentrated on theoretical approaches; effective tools are still missing. The authors propose a documentation tool for use in 3D reconstruction projects to support frequent tasks in digital reconstruction processes. The tool aims mainly to facilitate documentation and development processes in such a way that the input of data becomes simple and intuitive. The benefit of this work becomes apparent to all stakeholders. The proposed tool aims to be both, a collaboration platform and a research environment, complying with metadata standards and guidelines, such as the London Charter principles. Drawing on the authors’ experience of applying the tool to reconstruction of historic buildings, abstract concepts for a wider range of reconstruction tools are presented.


Documentation Digital reconstruction Graph database CIDOC CRM WebGL Web application 


  1. 1.
    Pfarr, M.: Dokumentationssystem für Digitale Rekonstruktionen am Beispiel der Grabanlage Zhaoling, Provinz Saanxi, China. Dissertation, TU Darmstadt (2010)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Münster, S.: Interdisziplinäre Kooperation bei der Erstellung virtueller geschichtswissenschaftlicher 3D-Rekonstruktionen. Dissertation, TU Dresden (2014)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ryan, N.: Documenting and validating virtual Archaeology. In: Archeologia e Calcolatori, vol. 12, pp. 245–273. All'Insegna del Giglio, Florence (2001)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Denard, H. (ed.): The London Charter for the Computer-based Visualisation of Cultural Heritage. London (2009). Accessed 26 Jul 2016
  5. 5.
    Spanish Society of Virtual Archaeology: The Seville Charter. International Principles of Virtual Archeology. Seville. (2012).
  6. 6.
    Arnold, D., Geser, G.: EPOCH Research Agenda – Final Report. Brighton (2008)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Pletinckx, D.: Interpretation management: how to make sustainable visualisations of the past. In: EPOCH Conference on Open Digital Heritage Systems, Rome (2008)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Pletinckx, D.: How to make sustainable visualizations of the past. An EPOCH common infrastructure tool for interpretation management. In: Bentkowska-Kafel, A., Denard, H., Baker, D. (eds.) Paradata and Transparency in Virtual Heritage, pp. 203–244. Ashgate, Farnham (2012)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    3D-COFORM. Accessed 27 Jan 2016
  10. 10.
    3D-ICONS. Accessed 27 Jan 2016
  11. 11.
    Warwick, C.: Studying users in digital humanities. In: Warwick, C., Terras, M., Nyhan, J. (eds.) Digital Humanities in Practice, pp. 1–21. Facet Publishing, London (2012)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    ICOM/CIDOC CRM Special Interest Group: Definition of the CIDOC Conceptual Reference Model. Version 5.0.4 (2011)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Partner, J., Vukotic, A., Watt, N.: Neo4j in Action. Manning Publications, New York (2013)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Robinson, I., Webber, J., Eifrem, E.: Graph Databases. O’Reilly Media, Sebastopol (2013)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hiebel, G., Hanke, K., Hayek, I.: A relational database structure and user interface for the CIDOC CRM with GIS integration. In: 22nd CIDOC CRM SIG Meeting, Nuremberg (2010)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Fink, G., Flatow, I.: Pro Single Page Application Development. Apress, New York (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Doboš, J.: Management and Visualisation of Non-linear History of Polygonal 3D Models. Dissertation, University College London (2015)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Geelnard, M.: OpenCTM. Accessed 08 Jun 2015

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of Applied SciencesDresdenGermany

Personalised recommendations