Advertisement

The Last Days of Education? An Attempt to Reclaim Teaching through Socratic Dialogue

  • Craig Wood
Chapter
Part of the Creativity, Education and the Arts book series (CEA)

Abstract

Critical teacher research recognises the Global Education Reform Movement as a repressive agenda that privileges reductive neo-liberalism over the emancipatory possibilities that education can offer to students. Teachers are positioned as marginalised stakeholders in the field of education and I draw on my own lived experiences and professional experiences with colleagues that are represented through five acts of Socratic dialogue and an epilogue. The epilogue joins calls for an Alternative Reform Movement in which public school allies reclaim curriculum, pedagogy, the teaching profession and our schools from the vested interest of globalised capital and its conservative political allies.

References

  1. Adams, T. E., Holman Jones, S., & Elllis, C. (2015). Autoethnography: Understanding qualitative research (p. 32). New York: Oxford University.Google Scholar
  2. Atkin, J. (2011). Leading authentic curriculum renewal with a focus on the Australian Curriculum. Keynote presentation at Australian Curriculum Studies Association Conference, Sydney, Australia, 7–9 October 2011.Google Scholar
  3. Berry, J. (2016). Teachers undefeated: How global education reform has failed to crush the spirit of educators. London: Trentham Books.Google Scholar
  4. Cortez, G. A. (2013). Occupy public education: A community’s struggle for educational resources in the era of privatization. Equity and Excellence in Education, 46(1), 7–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Crowther, F., & Boyne, K. (2016). Energising teaching: The power of your unique pedagogical gift. Sydney: New South Books.Google Scholar
  6. Denzin, N. K. (2010). The qualitative manifesto: A call to arms (p. 32). Walnut Creek: Left Coast Press.Google Scholar
  7. Denzin, N. K. (2014a). Interpretive autoethnography. Thousand Oaks: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Denzin, N. K. (2014b). Interpretive autoethnography (p. 78). Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  9. Department of Education, Training and Employment, & Australian Council for Educational Research. (2012). National school improvement tool. Retrieved December 6, 2014, from http://www.acer.edu.au/files/NSIT.pdf
  10. Ellis, C. (2004). The ethnographic I: A methodological novel about autoethnography (p. 152). Walnut Creek: Alta Mira Press.Google Scholar
  11. Ellis, C. (2009). Revision: Autoethnographic reflections on life and work (p. 107). Walnut Creek: Left Coast Press.Google Scholar
  12. Entin, J., Ohmann, R., & O’Malley, S. (2013). Occupy and education: Introduction. Radical Teacher, 96, 1–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Freire, P. (1995). Pedagogy of hope: Reliving pedagogy of the oppressed. New York: Continuum Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  14. Giroux, H. A. (2011). On critical pedagogy. New York: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
  15. Greene, M. (1978). Landscapes of learning. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  16. Hattie, J. (2012). Visible learning for teachers: Maximising impact on learning. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  17. hooks, b. (1994). Teaching to transgress: Education as the practice of freedom. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  18. Leavy, P. (2013). Fiction as research practice: Short stories, novellas and novels (p. 23). Walnut Creek: Left Coast Press.Google Scholar
  19. Marsh, C. J. (2009). Key concepts for understanding curriculum (4th ed.). Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  20. Marzano, R. J. (2007). The art and science of teaching: A comprehensive framework for effective instruction. Alexandria: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.Google Scholar
  21. McLaren, P. (1998). Life in schools: An introduction to critical pedagogy in the foundations of education (3rd ed.). New York: Longman.Google Scholar
  22. Mitchie, G. (2012). We don't need another hero: Struggle, hope, and possibility in the age of high-stakes schooling. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  23. Picower, B. (2012). Education should be free! Occupy the DOE!: Teacher activists involved in the Occupy Wall street movement. Critical Studies in Education, 54, 44–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Pinar, W. F. (2012). What is curriculum theory? (2nd ed.). Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  25. Queensland Government. (2014). The Queensland plan: Queenslander’s 30 year vision. Retrieved December 6, 2014, from http://queenslandplan.qld.gov.au/foundations/education.aspx
  26. Rose, D. (2015). Reading to learn: Accelerating learning and closing the gap. Retrieved August 17, 2015, from www.readingtolearn.com.au
  27. Sahlberg, P. (2009). Learning first: School accountability for a sustainable society. In K. D. Gariepy, B. L. Spencer, & J.-C. Couture (Eds.), Educational accountability: Professional voices from the field (pp. 1–22). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.Google Scholar
  28. Tarrant, H. (Ed.). (2003). Plato’s last days of Socrates. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  29. United Nations. (2000). Education for all. Retrieved December 6, 2014, from http://www.un.org/en/globalissues/briefingpapers/efa/
  30. Winton, S., & Brewer, C. A. (2014). People for education: A critical policy history. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 27(9), 1091–1109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Wood, C.A. (2010). Dear Mrs Edmondson: Understanding theatre-in-education as enacted curriculum for year 10 history students in the context of the planned Australian Curriculum. Unpublished master’s thesis, Griffith University, Brisbane, Australia.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Craig Wood
    • 1
  1. 1.Griffith UniversityNathanAustralia

Personalised recommendations