Advertisement

Platelet-Derived Inhibitors of Platelet Activation

  • A. J. Unsworth
  • A. P. Bye
  • J. M. GibbinsEmail author
Chapter
  • 2.5k Downloads

Abstract

Negative regulators of platelet activation are a relatively unexplored aspect of platelet physiology yet have an important role in tempering thrombus development by contributing much needed negative regulation to a process that is amplified by several positive feedback mechanisms. Some negative regulators, such as RASA3 and JAM-A, act as gatekeepers that modulate key mediators of activation and provide barriers that must be deactivated to permit full activation and stable thrombus formation. Other negative regulators, such as PECAM-1 and other proteins that signal through ITIMs, come into play once platelets are activated and provide restraining, negative feedback for activatory pathways. Many platelet-derived inhibitors have been identified but not fully characterised and so questions remain regarding the mechanisms that underlie the effects on platelet activity following their activation, inhibition or genetic disruption. However, dysregulation of inhibitory signals is believed to contribute to enhanced risk of thrombosis in diseases such as diabetes and other pathological conditions. In this chapter we have described platelet-derived inhibitors of platelet function that are secreted by or expressed within platelets themselves to provide inhibition or negative regulation to the processes that underpin activation.

Keywords

Nitric Oxide Platelet Activation Negative Regulatory Role Platelet Agonist Clot Retraction 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Introduction

When blood vessels are damaged, circulating platelets come into contact with activating stimuli that trigger aggregation and enable them to form a hemostatic plug. This process is subject to both positive and negative feedback to ensure that platelets respond appropriately to damage and do not form thrombi that totally occlude the vessel. It is believed that dysregulation of negative feedback mechanisms contributes to increased risk of thrombosis associated with some diseases. Despite this association with thrombosis, platelet-derived negative regulators of platelet activation are relatively poorly understood in comparison to mediators of platelet activation. However, it is becoming increasingly apparent that the mechanisms by which platelets restrain activation are diverse and of equal complexity to those that mediate positive signaling. Some regulators, such as RASA3 and JAM-A, act as gatekeepers that must be deactivated before platelet activation can occur. In contrast, regulators that contain ITIMs, such as PECAM-1, are activated following stimulation and mediate negative regulation via phosphatases that restrain activation. Wnt3a and ESAM are thought to directly limit platelet-platelet adhesion by blocking activation of the fibrinogen receptor, integrin αIIBβ3. The various isoforms of PKC expressed by platelets elicit a diverse and complex array of inhibitory effects including receptor desensitisation. Many platelet derived inhibitors have been identified but not yet fully characterized and so questions remain regarding the details of their roles in the regulation of platelet activity. In this chapter we have described platelet-derived inhibitors of platelet function that are secreted by or expressed within platelets themselves to provide inhibition or negative regulation to the processes that underpin activation (Table 1).
Table 1

Platelet-derived inhibitors of platelet activation

Immunoreceptor tyrosine-based inhibitory motif containing receptors (ITIMs)

PECAM-1

CEACAM1/2

G6b-B

PIRB/LILRB

Intracellular nuclear receptors

PPARs (PPARα, PPARβ/δ and PPARγ)

LXR

RXR

GR

Negative regulators of small GTPases and integrin α IIb β 3

RASA3

JAM-A

ESAM

Wnt3a

Neuropilin-1 plexin A complex

Cyclic nucleotide signaling

cAMP and PKA

Platelet-derived NO and PKG

Other mechanisms

Phosphatases

Receptor desensitisation

Protein kinase C isoforms (PKCδ and PKCθ)

Platelet-derived inhibitors of platelet function that are secreted or expressed by within platelets that provide inhibition or negative regulation to the processes that underpin activation

ITIM Signaling

Immunoreceptor tyrosine-based inhibitory motif (ITIM) containing receptors are capable, following ligand binding, of triggering cell signaling mechanisms that counteract activation processes. The ITIM consensus sequence L/I/V/S-x-Y-x-x-L/V usually found in the cytoplasmic tail has been identified in several proteins that are expressed in platelets, including PECAM-1, CEACAM, G6b-B, and LILRB2/PIRB which are associated with the negative regulation of platelet activation (Wu and Lian 1997; Cicmil et al. 2000; Jones et al. 2001; Wong et al. 2009; Alshahrani et al. 2014; Yip et al. 2015; Newland et al. 2007; Mori et al. 2008; Coxon et al. 2012). When ITIM-bearing receptors bind their ligand, the receptors cluster and src family kinases phosphorylate the tyrosine residues in the ITIM motif. The phosphorylated ITIM is then able to recruit negative regulators including phosphatases such as SHP1/SHP2 (Kharitonenkov et al. 1997) and SHIP1/SHIP2 (Bruhns et al. 2000). The recruited phosphatases are localised within close proximity to their substrates, which allows them to inactivate molecules involved in activatory cell signaling including tyrosine kinases and phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K) (Fig. 1). ITIMs were initially considered to be the ‘off switch’ that counteracts the positive signaling initiated by ITAM (Immunoreceptor tyrosine-based activation motif, consensus sequence Yxx(L/I)x6–12Yxx(L/I)) containing receptors such as the GPVI (glycoprotein VI) receptor complex. However, studies have now identified negative regulation of GPCR signaling by PECAM-1 and G6b-B that are independent of ITAM signaling pathways (Newland et al. 2007; Jones et al. 2009) (Fig. 1).
Fig. 1

ITIM signaling. When ITIM-bearing receptors bind their ligand they cluster and the ITIM domains are phosphorylated. The phosphorylated ITIM domains recruit phosphatases through their SH2 domains, bringing them into close proximity with their substrates. The phosphatases SHP1/2 and SHIP1/2 dephosphorylate PI3K, LAT and PLCγ2 and other molecules in the signaling pathways evoked by ITAM containing/linked receptors, such as GPVI, causing inactivation and contributing to negative regulation. The phosphatases recruited by ITIMs are also able to negatively regulate PI3K downstream of GPCRs, contributing negative regulation to non-ITAM signaling pathways

PECAM-1

Platelet endothelial cell adhesion molecule-1 (PECAM-1) is a 130 kDa member of the immunoglobulin superfamily that is expressed on several haematopoietic cells including platelets, monocytes, neutrophils, some types of T cells and endothelial cells and is associated with several biological processes including negative regulation of platelet activation (Newman 1997). PECAM-1 contains a 574 amino acid extracellular domain that is composed of 6 Ig-like domains and mediates homophilic interactions with other PECAM-1 molecules. It also contains a short 19 amino acid single transmembrane spanning domain and a 118 amino acid cytoplasmic domain that includes the ITIM (Sun et al. 1996; Newton et al. 1997; Goyert et al. 1986; Lyons et al. 1988). Expression levels of PECAM-1 are variable with copy numbers ranging between 5,000 and 20,000 present at the cell surface per platelet (Jones et al. 2009). PECAM-1 is present in platelet α-granules, resulting in an increase in cell surface expression following platelet activation and granule secretion (Hidari et al. 1997; Wu and Lian 1997; Metzelaar et al. 1991; Jones et al. 2009). PECAM-1 is believed to be activated by homomeric clustering (Thai le et al. 2003) but interactions with other receptors have also been reported (Buckley et al. 1996). Clustering of PECAM-1 to ITAM containing receptors or ligation of PECAM-1 using anti-PECAM-1 antibodies or recombinant human PECAM-1 immunoglobulin chimeras has been shown to inhibit GPVI, GPIb and GPCR-stimulated platelet aggregation. Activation of PECAM-1 has broad effects on signal transduction, including reduced total tyrosine phosphorylation, inositol tris-phosphate production, Ca2+ mobilisation and granule secretion which underpins a reduction in thrombus formation (Cicmil et al. 2002; Jones et al. 2001, 2009; Thai et al. 2003; Rathore et al. 2003). PECAM-1−/− platelets exhibit hyperreactivity when stimulated with low concentrations of collagen and CRP (collagen related peptide) but not thrombin, ADP or PAR receptor agonists. Studies that have measured laser-induced thrombus formation in cremaster muscle arterioles in vivo using mice deficient in PECAM-1 indicate an inhibitory role for PECAM-1 in the regulation of thrombus formation, as increased thrombus size and stability is observed (Falati et al. 2006).

PECAM-1 is regulated by phosphorylation of its cytoplasmic tail at the tyrosine residues Y663 and Y686 within the ITIM and ITSM (immunoreceptor tyrosine-based switch motif) motifs. PECAM-1 is constitutively phosphorylated at low levels in resting platelets and phosphorylation is increased following anti-PECAM-1 antibody induced crosslinking, but also in response to several platelet agonists including collagen, convulxin, thrombin and GPIb agonists suggesting that PECAM-1 provides a negative feedback mechanism to control the level of platelet activation and thrombus formation (Jackson et al. 1997; Modderman et al. 1994; Cicmil et al. 2000; Jones et al. 2001; Rathore et al. 2003). Phosphorylation of PECAM-1 at an ITIM is mediated by activation of Src family kinases and Fyn, Lyn, Src, Yes and Hck have all been shown to coimmunoprecipitate with PECAM-1 (Cao et al. 1998; Cicmil et al. 2000). Phosphorylated ITIMs provide a binding and activation platform for SH2 domain containing proteins, including phosphatases SHP1 and SHP2, SHIP1 and PP2A (Pumphrey et al. 1999; Relou et al. 2003; Henshall et al. 2001) that are associated with the negative regulation of platelet activity. Following activation of GPVI signaling, PI3K associates with the LAT signalosome which is located in lipid rafts that are enriched with the phosphoinositide substrates of PI3K. In contrast to LAT, the majority of PECAM-1 molecules are excluded from lipid rafts. Following crosslinking of PECAM-1, SHP2 is recruited to PECAM-1 and associates with PI3K, relocalising PI3K away from lipid rafts and the LAT signalosome, preventing association with and activation of PI3K (Moraes et al. 2010a). Most recently the mechanism by which PECAM-1 negatively regulates responses to non-GPVI agonists such as thrombin and VWF has also been described (Jones et al. 2014). PECAM-1 inhibits fibrinogen binding and secretion stimulated by thrombin but not PAR1 and PAR4 activating peptides, which suggests that PECAM-1 has a role in regulating GPIbα, a receptor that recruits thrombin to the platelet plasma membrane facilitating stimulation of PARs (Jones et al. 2012). PECAM-1 was found to mediate the internalisation of GPIbα in platelets through dual AKT/glycogen synthase kinase-3/dynamin-dependent and αIIbβ3-dependent mechanisms.

A study looking at the expression patterns of PECAM-1 in platelets has identified that expression levels of PECAM-1 are variable within the human population with approximately 5,000–20,000 copies estimated to be present at the cell surface. Analysis of the relationship between receptor expression levels and platelet responsiveness to platelet agonists revealed an inverse relationship between levels of PECAM-1 expression and platelet response to stimulation by CRP and ADP (Jones et al. 2009). Although the association is described as modest accounting for 6–10 % of total variability in responses, this was at a similar level of magnitude to that observed for the positive correlation of GPVI or αIIbβ3 expression levels with platelet responsiveness.

Despite the overall negative role for PECAM-1 in the regulation of platelet activity, PECAM-1 signaling in other cell types is associated with the regulation of integrin function, whereby crosslinking of PECAM-1 enhances adhesion mediated by integrins (Tanaka et al. 1992; Piali et al. 1993; Leavesley et al. 1994; Berman et al. 1996; Varon et al. 1998; Chiba et al. 1999; Zhao and Newman 2001). Studies in human platelets have shown that antibody crosslinking of PECAM-1 enhances adhesion and spreading on fibrinogen (Zhao and Newman 2001) indicating a positive role for PECAM-1 in the regulation of integrin αIIbβ3. Mouse platelets deficient in PECAM-1 show impaired spreading and adhesion on fibrinogen, clot retraction and phosphorylation of focal adhesion kinase, suggesting a defect in integrin αIIbβ3 outside-in signaling (Wee and Jackson 2005). It has been hypothesised that a dual role for PECAM-1 could therefore exist, in which it initially functions to suppress platelet activation but once platelets are strongly activated, PECAM-1 positively regulates functions mediated by integrin outside-in signaling (Jones et al. 2012).

High plasma cholesterol levels significantly increase an individual’s risk of atherosclerosis, coronary heart disease, heart attacks and stroke. Statins are widely prescribed as cholesterol lowering drugs and have been shown to reduce platelet activation. It has been described that one possible mechanism by which statins inhibit platelet function is through the activation and regulation of PECAM-1 (Moraes et al. 2013). Treatment of platelets with simvastatin results in increased PECAM-1 phosphorylation and recruitment of SHP2 to the ITIM which are essential for the negative function of PECAM-1. In further support of statins working through PECAM-1, PECAM-1 deficient mouse platelets showed reduced sensitivity to statins compared to WT controls indicating that statins exert their effects via PECAM-1.

CEACAM1 and CEACAM2

Carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA)-related cell adhesion molecules, CEACAM1 and CEACAM2 are ITIM containing membrane receptors that are expressed in both human and mouse platelets. CEACAM1 and 2 both contain extracellular glycosylated Ig-domains (four in CEACAM1 and two in CEACAM2), a transmembrane domain and a long cytoplasmic tail that contains the ITIM which is almost identical between the two proteins (Salaheldeen et al. 2012). CEACAM1 is activated following clustering via a homophilic interaction. The endogenous ligand of CEACAM2 has not yet been identified but can be activated by the murine coronavirus mouse hepatitis virus spike glycoprotein(s) (Robitaille et al. 1999). Studies using other cell types including T-cells and epithelial cells (Nagaishi et al. 2006) have shown that CEACAM1 and CEACAM2 use their ITIMs to recruit SHP1 and, to a lesser degree, SHP2 which can then initiate negative regulation of positive signaling pathways (Beauchemin et al. 1997).

Mice deficient in either CEACAM1 or CEACAM-2 show increased adhesion to fibrillar collagen and increased aggregation and secretion evoked by GPVI which indicates a role for both receptors in the negative regulation of GPVI signaling and platelet responses (Wong et al. 2009; Alshahrani et al. 2014). CEACAM2 deficient platelets have also been shown to exhibit increased platelet responses to CLEC-2 agonist Rhodocytin. Platelets deficient in either CEACAM1 or CEACAM2 show increased tyrosine phosphorylation of Syk and PLCγ2 following stimulation by CRP and also Rhodocytin in CEACAM2−/− platelets. Platelets from mice deficient in either CEACAM1 or CEACAM2 display increased thrombus growth in vitro and in vivo suggesting that CEACAM1 and 2, like PECAM-1, are negative regulators of platelet GPVI signaling. Also similar to that observed with PECAM-1, it has been recently described that CEACAM1−/− platelets show reduced signaling and activation through αIIbβ3 suggesting an alternative, positive regulatory mechanism for CEACAM1 in platelets (Yip et al. 2015). The role of CEACAM2 in the regulation of integrin αIIbβ3 is as yet unknown .

G6b-B

The transmembrane protein G6b was identified through both proteomics and gene expression studies (Macaulay et al. 2007; Senis et al. 2007) and the G6b-B variant was confirmed to be present in platelets (Senis et al. 2007). G6b-B contains an extracellular domain consisting of 125 amino acids and a cytoplasmic tail that contains two ITIM sequences. The endogenous ligand of G6b-B has not yet been identified, but G6b-B has been shown to be constitutively phosphorylated in resting platelets, and this increases following stimulation with GPVI specific agonist CRP or thrombin (Senis et al. 2007). Treatment of cells expressing G6b-B with pervanadate to inhibit phosphatases enhances tyrosine phosphorylation of G6b-B and the recruitment of SHP1 and SHP2 (de Vet et al. 2001; Coxon et al. 2012), thereby suggesting that G6b-B works via a similar mechanism to other ITIM containing proteins to inhibit platelets. Interestingly, studies using the DT40 cell line show that inhibition of GPVI signaling following G6b-B expression is retained in the absence of both SHP1 and SHP2, and is also retained in the absence of SHIP suggesting redundancy between these phosphatases or the involvement of other inhibitory molecules and mechanisms of action (Mori et al. 2008). Recent studies have identified that G6b-B is capable of interacting with several key signaling molecules, including Csk, Src, Fyn, Syk, PLCγ2 and PI3K, and it has been suggested that G6b-B may mediate its inhibitory effects on signaling and platelet activity by redistributing signaling molecules away from their substrates (Coxon et al. 2012). Further evidence of a negative regulatory role for G6b-B in platelets was found by using a crosslinking antibody for G6b-B which caused inhibition of platelet aggregation to CRP, and ADP. No alteration in ADP-stimulated Ca2+ signaling was observed suggesting that G6b-B acts downstream of Ca2+ release. This suggests that G6b-B may act via an alternative inhibitory mechanism to that observed downstream of other ITIM containing receptors such as PECAM and CEACAM, where G6b-B is capable of inhibiting signaling events downstream of mobilisation of intracellular Ca2+ (Newland et al. 2007). However, G6b-B deficient mice do not show platelet hyperreactivity, although this is likely to be attributed to an increase in GPVI receptor shedding, that is observed as a result of enhanced metalloproteinase production in the megakaryocytes of these mice (Mazharian et al. 2012). This indicates an important role for G6b-B in megakaryocytes but the physiological role of G6b-B in platelets remains unclear (Mazharian et al. 2012).

PIRB/LILRB

The leukocyte immunoglobulin like receptors (LILRs) include two subfamilies, LILRA and LILRB, whilst the LILRA proteins contain an ITAM domain, the LILRB family members are characterised as containing an ITIM. Human platelets express LILRB2 and mouse platelets express its homolog PIRB which contains four cytoplasmic ITIMs (Takai 2005). Platelets have also been found to express the PIRB ligand ANGPTL2, which is found in alpha granules, and may suggest that autocrine self-negative regulation of platelets via PIRB/LILRB2 following their activation may occur (Zheng et al. 2012; Fan et al. 2014). Recent studies have identified that treatment of platelets with purified ANGPTL2 results in an inhibition of their activation to several agonists including CRP, ADP and thrombin while adhesion and spreading on fibrinogen is also inhibited (Fan et al. 2014). PIRB-TM mutant mice, which are unable to mediate intracellular signaling through this receptor, have a hyper-reactive platelet phenotype with increased aggregation evoked by CRP, increased spreading on fibrinogen and increased clot retraction. Key GPVI signaling events following activation by CRP including phosphorylation of LAT, SLP-76 and PLCγ2 are inhibited following ANGPTL2 treatment and increased in PIRB-TM mutants. During adhesion to fibrinogen, phosphorylation of FAK and β3 is also enhanced in PIRB-TM mouse platelets. PIRB dependent inhibition of GPVI and integrin αIIbβ3 signaling has been linked to the recruitment of SHP1 and SHP2 phosphatases, as both are recruited to PIRB and are phosphorylated following treatment with ANGPTL2 but their recruitment and phosphorylation is reduced in PIRB-TM expressing mice (Fan et al. 2014).

Intracellular Nuclear Receptors

Several intracellular nuclear receptors have been identified and characterised in human platelets including the peroxisome proliferator activating receptors (PPAR)s, PPARα, PPARβ/δ and PPARγ, the retinoid X receptor (RXR), liver X receptor (LXR), farnesoid X receptor (FXR) and glucocorticoid receptor (GR) (Moraes et al. 2005a, 2007, 2010c; Spyridon et al. 2011; Ali et al. 2006a) (Fig. 2).
Fig. 2

Intracellular nuclear receptor signaling. Several intracellular nuclear receptors have been identified and characterised in human platelets including the peroxisome proliferator activating receptors (PPAR)s, PPARα, PPARβ/δ and PPARγ, the retinoid X receptor (RXR), liver X receptor (LXR), farnesoid X receptor (FXR) and glucocorticoid receptor (GR). The nuclear receptors are believed to negatively regulate platelet activity through various mechanisms following activation by their ligands, although these mechanisms are not well characterised. Both PPARα and PPARβ/δ are thought to negatively regulate platelet function through regulation of cAMP levels, whilst PPARγ and LXR receptors interact with and inhibit components of early GPVI signaling. In contrast RXR and GR appear to inhibit Gq signaling events. Grey lines represent platelet agonist signaling and black arrows represent the pathways or proteins that are modulated by nuclear receptor agonists in platelets

Peroxisome Proliferator Activated Receptors

PPARs represent three nuclear receptor isoforms, PPARα, PPARβ and PPARγ (Berry et al. 2003) which are involved in cell development, differentiation, cholesterol and fatty acid metabolism and glucose homeostasis (O’Brien et al. 2007; Barak et al. 1999; Kersten et al. 2000). All three isoforms of PPAR, upon binding to their ligands, are capable of heterodimerising with RXR, another nuclear receptor and all have been identified to have acute non-genomic negative regulatory effects in human platelets.

Treatment of platelets with ligands for PPARα such as fenofibrate and statins was found to increase intracellular levels of cAMP resulting in inhibition of ADP-stimulated platelet activation. Fenofibrate was also found to inhibit platelet activation and increase bleeding time in WT mice but not mice deficient in PPARα−/− (Ali et al. 2009a). Following activation by fenofibrate, PPARα was found to associate with PKCα a key positive mediator of platelet activation, and it is thought that this interaction may in part contribute to the negative regulation of platelet activation that is observed following treatment with PPARα ligands.

PPARβ/δ has been shown to decrease plaque formation and attenuate the progression of atherosclerosis (Lee et al. 2003). Studies using synthetic agonists for PPARβ/δ, GW0742 and L-165041 have identified inhibitory actions for PPARβ/δ ligands on the mobilisation of intracellular Ca2+ and platelet aggregation following stimulation by ADP and other platelet agonists (Ali et al. 2006b). PGI2 a key inhibitory mediator of platelet function is also a ligand for PPARβ/δ and some of its inhibitory effects on platelet activity could be mediated through PPARβ/δ (Forman et al. 1997). As with PPARα, treatment of platelets with agonists of PPARβ/δ results in an increase in cAMP levels and PKCα has been identified as a potential binding partner of the receptor and a potential mechanism by which PPARβ/δ may regulate platelet reactivity (Ali et al. 2009b).

Agonists of PPARγ, the thiazolidinediones are currently in use for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus and have been observed clinically to have cardio-protective properties and reduce the risk of myocardial infarction (Dormandy et al. 2005; Sauer et al. 2006). The emerging role of PPARγ agonists as negative regulators of platelet function may provide a mechanistic basis for this observation. A clinical study that measured platelet function in patients with coronary heart disease treated with rosiglitazone reported long-term anti-platelet effects with down-regulation of P-selectin exposure and granule secretion in treated patients (Sidhu et al. 2004). Treatment of platelets ex vivo with the endogenous agonist of PPARγ, 15dPGJ2 or the synthetic agonist rosiglitazone results in reduced platelet responses including granule secretion and thromboxane B2 (TXB2) synthesis in response to thrombin or ADP (Akbiyik et al. 2004). Agonists of PPARγ have also been shown to suppress platelet activation stimulated by GPVI agonists, with platelet aggregation, granule secretion and mobilisation of intracellular Ca2+ inhibited following treatment with 15dPGJ2 (Moraes et al. 2010c). Treatment with PPARγ agonists results in reduced thrombus formation in vitro and in vivo (Moraes et al. 2010c; Li et al. 2005).

Additionally statins that are routinely prescribed as cholesterol lowering drugs have also been shown to activate PPARs (Ali et al. 2009a). Treatment of human whole blood with the statins, pravastatin, fluvastatin and simvastatin all resulted in a reduction in platelet aggregation to ADP. This decrease in platelet activity was attributed to a PPAR mediated increase in cAMP levels.

RXR

Human platelets and megakaryocytes express RXRα and RXRβ (Moraes et al. 2007). Treatment of platelets with the endogenous agonist of RXR, 9-cis-retinoic acid or the synthetic agonist, methoprene acid, results in an inhibition of Gq protein coupled induced platelet aggregation that is stimulated by ADP and thromboxane A2 (TxA2). It is thought RXR regulates GPCR mediated platelet activation by binding to Gq in a ligand-dependent manner inhibiting Gq induced rac activation and intracellular Ca2+ release (Moraes et al. 2007).

LXR

The LXRα and LXRβ isoforms of LXR are implicated in the regulation of fatty acid, cholesterol and glucose homeostasis (Viennois et al. 2011, 2012) and agonists for LXR have been described to have anti-inflammatory effects and be atheroprotective (Joseph et al. 2002; Tangirala et al. 2002). LXRβ has been identified as the isoform present in platelets (Spyridon et al. 2011), and endogenous ligands for the LXR receptors include oxysterols (oxygenated derivatives of cholesterol) and several synthetic agonists including GW3965 and T0901317 also exist (Gabbi et al. 2014; Wójcicka et al. 2015). Treatment of platelets with synthetic agonist GW3965 results in inhibition of platelet activation, including aggregation, secretion and integrin activation stimulated by collagen, CRP or thrombin. GW3965-treated mice form smaller, less stable thrombi following laser injury of the cremaster arterioles. LXR has also been shown to interact with several components of the GPVI signaling pathway following treatment with GW3965, including Syk and PLCγ2, resulting in decreased phosphorylation and signaling (Spyridon et al. 2011; Moraes et al. 2010b).

Glucocorticoid Receptor

The glucocorticoid receptor (GR) is activated by glucocorticoid steroid hormones, a major class of anti-inflammatory hormones, and prednisolone a synthetic derivative of cortisol that has been used to understand the role of GR in the regulation of platelet function. Platelets preincubated with prednisolone prior to agonist stimulation show reduced aggregation and TxB2 release in response to both ADP and TxA2 mimetic U46619 which could be reversed following treatment with a GR antagonist mifepristone (Moraes et al. 2005b). However, the mechanism underlying negative regulation of platelet function by GR agonists is still poorly understood.

Negative Regulators of Small GTPases and Integrin αIIbβ3 Activation

One of the key processes that underpin thrombus formation is the activation of the integrin αIIbβ3. Activation of αIIbβ3 results in a conformational change in the receptor that enables fibrinogen binding and aggregation, and also initiates outside in signaling which sustains platelet activation. Suppression of integrin αIIbβ3 activation prevents inappropriate platelet aggregation and excessive thrombus formation that can cause vessel occlusion (Fig. 3).
Fig. 3

Negative regulators of small GTPases and integrin αIIbβ3. RASA3 inhibits Rap1b, preventing signal transduction that enables integrin αIIbβ3 activation until PI3K activation downstream of Gi-coupled P2Y12 inhibits RASA3. Wnt 3a activates the β-catenin signaling pathway that negatively regulates small GTPases including Rac1 and Rap1 that underpin integrin activation. The neuropilin-1-plexin A complex is activated by semaphorin 3A which also negatively regulates Rac1. JAM-A inhibits c-Src-dependent integrin αIIbβ3 outside-in signaling through activation of Csk which negatively regulates c-Src. Stimulation with agonists causes dissociation of JAM-A from integrin αIIbβ3, reducing Csk activity and enabling activation of c-Src mediated integrin αIIbβ3 outside-in signaling. Semaphorin 3A is believed to activate the neuropilin-1 plexin A complex which inhibits Rac1 causing inhibition of integrin αIIbβ3 activation

RASA3

RASA3 has recently been identified as an important inhibitor of integrin αIIbβ3 activation (Stefanini et al. 2015) through the regulation of Rap1b which is a critical regulator of integrin function in platelets (Chrzanowska-Wodnicka et al. 2005; Stefanini et al. 2012). Rap1b is positively regulated by the Ca2+-sensing guanine exchange factor (GEF), CAlDAG-GEF1 (Crittenden et al. 2004) and RASA3 provides opposing, negative regulation that maintains platelets in a quiescent state when at resting [Ca2+]i (Stefanini et al. 2015). RASA3 deficiency is embryonically lethal in mice but homozygous expression of a mutated form of RASA3 with impaired activity results in viable animals with platelet hyperreactivity that can be rescued by simultaneous deficiency of CALDAG-GEF1. However, integrin αIIbβ3 activation in the double knockout mouse occurs independently of the ADP receptor P2Y12 and PI3K.

JAM-A

JAM-A is a transmembrane protein of the CTX family that is expressed on cell surface and has been identified in platelets. Mice deficient in JAM-A display increased aggregation to several platelet agonists, increased spreading on fibrinogen and clot retraction and increased thrombus formation indicating a role for JAM-A in the negative regulation of integrin αIIbβ3 (Naik et al. 2012). JAM-A is phosphorylated in resting platelets and associates with αIIbβ3 (Naik et al. 2012). JAM-A is proposed to keep the integrin inactive by binding C-terminal src kinase (Csk) via its SH2 domain which recruits it to the integrin. Recruitment of Csk ensures that c-Src, which is associated with the integrin, remains in an inactive state through phosphorylation of the inhibitory Y529 in c-Src’s regulatory domain (Naik et al. 2014). On platelet activation JAM-A is dephosphorylated, Csk dissociates enabling activation of c-Src and integrin αIIbβ3 activation.

Studies using ApoE deficient mice that model high plasma cholesterol levels and atherosclerosis have highlighted the importance of the platelet inhibitory receptor JAM-A in the development of the disease state. A recent study has shown that platelet deficiency in the inhibitory receptor JAM-A in ApoE−/− mice fed a high fat diet increases aortic plaque formation and recruitment of inflammatory cells, suggesting that platelet hyperreactivity such as that observed in JAM-A−/− platelets can contribute to atherosclerotic plaque formation (Karshovska et al. 2015).

ESAM

ESAM, a transmembrane glycoprotein, like JAM-A is a member of the CTX family and is also suggested to be involved in the negative regulation of adhesion and integrin αIIbβ3 outside-in signaling. In contrast to JAM-A, ESAM appears to negatively regulate integrin αIIbβ3 and limit its activity following platelet activation. ESAM is contained in platelet alpha granules and is translocated to the cell surface on activation (Nasdala et al. 2002). Mouse platelets deficient in ESAM show increased aggregation to GPCR agonists, inhibition of clot retraction, increased thrombus formation in vivo and reduced tail bleeding (Stalker et al. 2009). The mechanism by which ESAM functions is currently unknown, although interaction via its PDZ domain with NHERF-1, a scaffold protein highlights possible interaction with and regulation of several proteins, including GPCRs (Hall et al. 1998), G proteins and PLCβ (Rochdi et al. 2002) and components of the cytoskeleton (Shenolikar et al. 2004).

Wnt3a

Wnt3a is a glycoprotein that is released from endothelial cells (Goodwin et al. 2006) and also from TRAP stimulated platelets, enabling platelets to self-regulate and limit activation (Steele et al. 2009). Treatment of platelets with Wnt3a results in an inhibition of platelet adhesion and shape change, reduced dense granule secretion and reduced RhoA activation leading to diminished integrin αIIbβ3 activation and aggregation. In platelets, Wnt3a is thought to exert its effects through activation of the canonical Wnt-β-catenin signaling pathway components that also appear to be present in platelets (Semenov et al. 2007; MacDonald et al. 2007; Huang and He 2008). In other cell types β-catenin has been shown to play a role in the regulation of cell adhesion, where it is involved in supporting the interaction of cadherins to the cytoskeleton (Huang and He 2008). Negative regulation of platelet activation via Wnt3a signaling is thought to occur through regulation of small GTPase activity, including Rap1, Cdc42, Rac1, RhoA (Steele et al. 2012). It is thought that by favouring the GDP-bound state of Rap1 and Rho via the regulation of Rap1GAP and RhoA GTPase activity, whilst increasing levels of Cdc42 and Rac1 GTP levels, Wnt3a inhibits integrin αIIbβ3 adhesion and spreading.

Neuropilin-1-Plexin A Complex

Semaphorin 3A exists as a soluble covalently bound homodimer and is secreted by vascular endothelial cells (Serini et al. 2003). Semaphorin 3A negatively regulates platelet function through binding to the neuropilin-1-plexin A receptor complex which has been identified in platelets (Takahashi et al. 1999; Tamagnone et al. 1999; Kashiwagi et al. 2005). Semaphorin 3A treatment inhibits platelet function, possibly through regulation of integrin αIIbβ3 as activation of the integrin, aggregation and adhesion and spreading evoked by several platelet agonists are impaired. The exact mechanisms by which Semaphorin 3A inhibits platelet function have not been fully elucidated, although inhibition of the GTPase Rac1 appears to be a key regulatory step in the negative regulation of αIIbβ3 and cytoskeletal rearrangements (Kashiwagi et al. 2005).

Cyclic Nucleotide Signaling

Cyclic nucleotides cAMP and cGMP are well-established inhibitors of platelet activation. Endothelium derived prostacyclin (PGI2) and nitric oxide (NO) activate the production of cAMP and cGMP, respectively, and play essential roles in keeping platelets in the resting state in the circulation. The regulation of platelets by these molecules is discussed in detail in Chapter X.

cAMP and Protein Kinase A

PGI2 binds to and activates the prostaglandin receptor on the platelet surface (Dutta-Roy and Sinha 1987), which then propagates inhibitory signaling through the activation of Gs subunits that activate adenylyl cyclase and stimulate the production of cAMP from ATP (Gorman et al. 1977). cAMP activates cAMP dependent protein kinase A (PKA). Following platelet activation by agonists such as ADP and thrombin, adenylyl cyclase activity is inhibited and cAMP levels reduced through Gi signaling (Jantzen et al. 2001; Yang et al. 2002). PKA phosphorylates multiple target proteins that maintain platelets in an inactive resting state by limiting platelet activation. Several substrates of PKA have been well characterised and are linked to the negative regulation of platelets, including VASP which is involved in cytoskeletal rearrangements (Waldmann et al. 1987; Butt et al. 1994), inhibition of Rap1b a key regulator of integrin αIIbβ3 affinity (Schultess et al. 2005; Miura et al. 1992), inositol trisphosphate receptor (IP3R) which is involved in Ca2+ regulation (Cavallini et al. 1996) and the thromboxane A2 receptor (Reid and Kinsella 2003). Other targets also include Gα13 (Manganello et al. 1999), GPIbβ (Wardell et al. 1989) and CALDAG-GEFI (Schultess et al. 2005)

Recent studies have identified a cAMP independent mechanism of PKA activation following stimulation of platelets by thrombin or collagen (Gambaryan et al. 2010). In resting platelets a population of platelet PKA appears to be associated with NFkB-IkBα. Following stimulation by collagen or thrombin the catalytic subunit of PKA dissociates from NFkB-IkBα and is activated, enabling phosphorylation and activation of its substrates. This identifies an inhibitory feedback mechanism that prevents excessive platelet activation in response to stimuli (Gambaryan et al. 2010).

Regulation of cGMP and PKG by Platelet-Derived NO

The cyclic nucleotide cGMP is a key negative regulator of platelet activation that inhibits platelets to keep them in the resting state in the healthy vasculature (Smolenski 2012). Endothelial release of nitric oxide (NO) keeps platelets inactive by regulating their intracellular levels of cGMP (Mellion et al. 1981; Radomski et al. 1987). Following the synthesis and release of NO from the healthy endothelium, NO crosses the platelet plasma membrane and binds to and activates, soluble guanyl cyclase (sGC), leading to the increased production of cGMP from GTP and activation of protein kinase G (PKG). Levels of cGMP are controlled by the phosphodiesterase, PDE5A which is present in platelets (Haslam et al. 1999). Platelets deficient in PKG are insensitive to cGMP-mediated inhibition of intracellular Ca2+ release (Eigenthaler et al. 1993) and PKG knockout mice have a prothrombotic phenotype and exhibit increased intravascular adhesion and aggregation following ischaemia (Massberg et al. 1999).

Platelets are now also considered to be a source of NO. The mechanism by which platelets synthesise NO and whether or not it is of physiological importance is, however, still an area of contention. Although NO itself is an established negative regulator of platelet function, the vascular endothelium has traditionally been considered the dominant source of NO within blood vessels. Platelets have been reported to express two nitric oxide synthase (NOS) isoforms, iNOS and eNOS but generate less NO than endothelial cells (Radomski et al. 1990b) and the presence of eNOS is contentious (Gambaryan et al. 2008). Studies into the effects of platelet-derived NO on platelet function using iNOS/eNOS knockout mice have suggested that eNOS is not a major regulator of platelet function (Gambaryan et al. 2008; Tymvios et al. 2009). There is evidence that platelets can produce NO from nitrate although further research is needed to understand the mechanism (Apostoli et al. 2014). Platelet NO production is inducible and is mediated by Ca2+ elevation (Radomski et al. 1990b) and is therefore stimulated by many platelet agonists such as ADP and arachidonic acid. However, the question of whether platelet-derived NO can inhibit platelet aggregation is a source of debate (Gkaliagkousi et al. 2007) with some reports describing platelet-derived NO-mediated inhibition (Radomski et al. 1990a, b) and others reporting no effect (Thomas et al. 1990; Thompson et al. 1986). More recent studies have provided further evidence for the presence of functional eNOS in platelets by measuring NO production in single platelets under flow (Cozzi et al. 2015) and also highlighted the anti-thrombotic potential of drugs that modulate platelet eNOS activity (Momi et al. 2014).

Defects in cAMP/cGMP signaling pathways have the potential to contribute to platelet hyperreactivity in cardiovascular disease including ischemic heart disease, heart failure and diabetes where the reduced sensitivity of platelets to the inhibitory effects of NO contributes to platelet hyperreactivity (Chirkov and Horowitz 2007). Platelets from patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and insulin insensitivity, for example, have reduced sensitivity to NO and prostacyclin and consequently higher platelet reactivity. Additionally a number of individuals with genetic abnormalities in prostacyclin signaling have reduced cAMP levels, resulting in hyper-reactive platelets and a prothrombotic state, and defects in sGC function are linked to an increase prevalence of ischemic heart disease, heart failure and diabetes (van Geet et al. 2009). In contrast patients with hypersensitivity to prostacyclin signaling, as a result of increased activity of Gs proteins show an increased risk of bleeding which is attributed to increased cAMP levels and an increased inhibition of platelet function (van Geet et al. 2009). It is also suggested that in patients with obesity in addition to defects in sGC function, cAMP synthesis may also be altered and defects in downstream effectors of cAMP and cGMP signaling may contribute to platelet hyperreactivity (Russo et al. 2010).

Other Mechanisms of Platelet Inhibition

Phosphatases

Protein modification by phosphorylation is a key mechanism of signal transduction in platelets. Phosphorylation is a reversible post-translational modification that enables regulation of signal transduction and platelet function by phosphatase dependent dephosphorylation of key signaling proteins. Phosphatases are key mediators of several negative signaling pathways in platelets such as those exhibited by the ITIM containing receptors. Protein tyrosine phosphatases such as SHP1 and SHP2, SHIP1 and SHIP2, PP2, PTEN and TULA2 have well-established roles in the negative regulation of platelet signaling, in general negatively regulating receptor proximal signaling events leading to reduced mobilisation of Ca2+, granule secretion and integrin activation (Senis 2013). SHP2 is well-established for its roles in the negative regulation of platelet signaling events downstream of the majority of platelet agonists, including GPVI and GPCRs (Ma et al. 2012; Jackson et al. 1997). These observations are supported by studies using mouse platelets deficient in SHP2 which show enhanced activation to fibrinogen (Mazharian et al. 2013). The histidine phosphatase TULA2 dephosphorylates and inactivates Syk preventing further downstream signaling (Thomas et al. 2010). TULA2 deficient mice platelets show increased hyperreactivity to GPVI agonists, and also increased thrombus formation and reduced bleeding times. The phosphoinositide phosphatases SHIP1 and PTEN are involved in the regulation of PI3K function through alteration of the phosphoinositol cycle (Laurent et al. 2014). PTEN-deficient platelets which show hyper-responsiveness to collagen exhibit increased PI3K activity and show reduced bleeding times in vivo. Finally the serine/threonine kinase phosphatase PP2A is involved in the negative regulation of integrin αIIbβ3 function and signaling (Pradhan et al. 2010; Gushiken et al. 2008). PP2A mediates dephosphorylation of PKCζ and PTP-1B which reduces Src phosphorylation and activation (Mayanglambam et al. 2011; Pradhan et al. 2010; Gushiken et al. 2008). It is important to note, however, that whilst several phosphatases are associated with negative regulation of platelet function, many positive regulatory functions for phosphatases have been identified in platelets (Senis 2013).

Receptor Desensitisation

Platelets can regulate and limit their responsiveness to platelet agonists, through desensitisation of their receptors following agonist stimulation. ADP, for example, is a critical secondary mediator of platelet signaling, yet despite this it has been shown that platelets desensitise following continued exposure to ADP (Mundell et al. 2006; Hardy et al. 2005; Cunningham et al. 2013). This diminished response is attributed to desensitisation of both the P2Y1 and P2Y12 receptors via agonist mediated internalisation of each receptor. Studies using both platelets and 1321N1 cells have identified that the P2Y1 and P2Y12 receptors are desensitised by different mechanisms following platelet agonist stimulation. Desensitisation of the P2Y1 receptor is mediated by both classical and novel isoforms of protein kinase C (PKC), whilst P2Y12 desensitisation is mediated by G protein coupled receptor kinase and the novel isoforms of PKC (Hardy et al. 2005).

PKC Isoforms

Protein kinase C (PKC), a family of serine/threonine kinases regulates many aspects of platelet signaling. The different isoforms of PKC are classified into three different subtypes classical, novel and atypical isoforms, according to their structure and mechanism of regulation. Several isoforms have been identified in human platelets although expression of some isoforms is controversial (Newton 1997; Mellor and Parker 1998; Murugappan et al. 2004; Buensuceso et al. 2005; Hall et al. 2008; Pears et al. 2008; Konopatskaya et al. 2009; Bynagari et al. 2009; Nagy et al. 2009; Harper and Poole 2010). Historically the PKC family were considered to play an overall positive role in the regulation of platelet activity, as broad spectrum PKC inhibitors were shown to inhibit granule secretion, TxA2 synthesis, integrin activation, aggregation and thrombus formation (Harper and Poole 2010). However, negative regulatory roles have subsequently also been identified for the PKC family. Studies using broad spectrum inhibitors have also identified negative roles in the regulation of receptor desensitisation (see section on receptor desensitisation) and Ca2+ release, and studies using isoform specific deficient mice have identified negative regulatory roles for the novel isoforms PKCδ and PKCθ (Harper and Poole 2010).

Transgenic mice deficient in PKCδ have identified a negative regulatory role for PKCδ in the regulation of integrin αIIbβ3 outside-in signaling and filopodia formation on fibrinogen due to an interaction between PKCδ and VASP (Pula et al. 2006). PKCδ has also been shown to negatively regulate GPVI-induced platelet responses, as platelets from PKCδ deficient mice have enhanced aggregation and dense granule secretion in comparison to WT controls. This was also confirmed in human platelets using a cell permeable peptide that is designed to block the interaction of PKCδ and δ(V1-1)-TAT (Chari et al. 2009). Contrasting reports, however, also exist as other groups found no abnormality in GPVI-dependent dense granule secretion in PKCδ−/− platelets (Pula et al. 2006). PKCδ deficient platelets generate larger thrombi when measured in vitro but not when measured in vivo (Gilio et al. 2010; Chari et al. 2009). The overall role of PKCδ has therefore been difficult to define, possibly as a consequence of diverse positive and negative regulatory roles played by this PKC isoform.

Studies that have utilised PKCθ isoform-specific inhibitors have identified negative roles for PKCθ in several processes in GPVI-induced platelet activation, including aggregation, α-granule secretion, αIIbβ3 activation and changes in intracellular Ca2+ levels, as all were increased following treatment of platelets with the inhibitor. Studies that have utilised PKCθ deficient mice have generated conflicting reports of both positive and negative roles in the regulation of platelet activation (Hall et al. 2008; Nagy et al. 2009; Harper and Poole 2009, 2010; Cohen et al. 2011; Unsworth et al. 2012; Gilio et al. 2010). These differences have been attributed to different experimental conditions whereby PKCθ may have a negative role following exposure to low agonist concentrations, and a positive role following exposure to higher concentrations of platelet agonists (Hall et al. 2008; Nagy et al. 2009; Cohen et al. 2011).

Conclusion

Platelet-derived mediators of negative regulation all function to limit or restrict platelet activation, yet are mechanistically diverse and affect pathways involved in many different processes (Fig. 4). While many negative regulators have been identified, many of the processes that they regulate to achieve platelet inhibition are not yet fully characterised. However, it is becoming increasingly clear that negative regulatory mechanisms rival the complexity of the positive regulators of platelet activation. The key challenge in the field of inhibitory platelet signaling will be to establish the physiological and pathological importance of these proteins, their potential as drug targets and their role in determining disease risk.
Fig. 4

Platelet-derived inhibitors of platelet function. Well-characterised activatory pathways (black) are regulated by multiple inhibitory pathways that regulate platelet responses to support their role in hemostasis. Receptors that signal through ITIMs (blue) recruit SHP1/2 and SHIP1/2 in close proximity to ITAM receptors where they dephosphorylate components of activation pathways, inactivating them to provide negative regulation. Small GTPases regulate several important process in platelets such as granule secretion and integrin αIIbβ3 activation and so inhibitors of small GTPases (yellow) such as RASA3 and Wnt3a/β-catenin provide negative regulation for these key events. PKA and PKG are inhibitory kinases that are regulated by cyclic nucleotides (green), although these pathways are primarily regulated by non-platelet-derived inhibitors they are also potentially regulated by platelet-derived NO and non-cAMP dependent PKA activation. Other negative regulators (purple) such as phosphatases and kinases that regulate receptor desensitisation do not easily fit into discrete categories and mediate negative feedback via diverse mechanisms

Take Home Messages

  • Platelet activation is triggered by stimuli that arise within the circulation

  • Activated platelets initiate their own positive feedback mechanisms that support thrombus growth

  • Platelets also generate negative feedback signals that can limit thrombus development

  • The mechanisms of negative regulators are diverse and many have not yet been fully characterised

  • Negative regulatory mechanisms may be as important as positive regulators to understand disease risk and discover new drug targets and therapies

References

  1. Akbiyik F, Ray DM, Gettings KF, Blumberg N, Francis CW, Phipps RP (2004) Human bone marrow megakaryocytes and platelets express PPARγ, and PPARγ agonists blunt platelet release of CD40 ligand and thromboxanes. Blood 104:1361–1368PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ali FY, Davidson SJ, Moraes LA, Traves SL, Paul-Clark M, Bishop-Bailey D, Warner TD, Mitchell JA (2006a) Role of nuclear receptor signaling in platelets: antithrombotic effects of PPARbeta. FASEB J 20:326–328PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Ali FY, Davidson SJ, Moraes LA, Traves SL, Paul-Clark M, Bishop-Bailey D, Warner TD, Mitchell JA (2006b) Role of nuclear receptor signaling in platelets: antithrombotic effects of PPARβ. FASEB J 20:326–328PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Ali FY, Armstrong PC, Dhanji A-RA, Tucker AT, Paul-Clark MJ, Mitchell JA, Warner TD (2009a) Antiplatelet actions of statins and fibrates are mediated by PPARs. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 29:706–711PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ali FY, Hall MG, Desvergne B, Warner TD, Mitchell JA (2009b) PPARβ/δ agonists modulate platelet function via a mechanism involving PPAR receptors and specific association/repression of PKCα–brief report. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 29:1871–1873PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Alshahrani MM, Yang E, Yip J, Ghanem SS, Abdallah SL, Deangelis AM, O’Malley CJ, Moheimani F, Najjar SM, Jackson DE (2014) CEACAM2 negatively regulates hemi (ITAM-bearing) GPVI and CLEC-2 pathways and thrombus growth in vitro and in vivo. Blood 124:2431–2441PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Apostoli GL, Solomon A, Smallwood MJ, Winyard PG, Emerson M (2014) Role of inorganic nitrate and nitrite in driving nitric oxide-cGMP-mediated inhibition of platelet aggregation in vitro and in vivo. J Thromb Haemost 12:1880–1889PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Barak Y, Nelson MC, Ong ES, Jones YZ, Ruiz-Lozano P, Chien KR, Koder A, Evans RM (1999) PPAR gamma is required for placental, cardiac, and adipose tissue development. Mol Cell 4:585–595PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Beauchemin N, Kunath T, Robitaille J, Chow B, Turbide C, Daniels E, Veillette A (1997) Association of biliary glycoprotein with protein tyrosine phosphatase SHP-1 in malignant colon epithelial cells. Oncogene 14:783–790PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Berman ME, Xie Y, Muller WA (1996) Roles of platelet/endothelial cell adhesion molecule-1 (PECAM-1, CD31) in natural killer cell transendothelial migration and beta 2 integrin activation. J Immunol 156:1515–1524PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Berry EB, Eykholt R, Helliwell RJ, Gilmour RS, Mitchell MD, Marvin KW (2003) Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor isoform expression changes in human gestational tissues with labor at term. Mol Pharmacol 64:1586–1590PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bruhns P, Vely F, Malbec O, Fridman WH, Vivier E, Daeron M (2000) Molecular basis of the recruitment of the SH2 domain-containing inositol 5-phosphatases SHIP1 and SHIP2 by fcgamma RIIB. J Biol Chem 275:37357–37364PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Buckley CD, Doyonnas R, Newton JP, Blystone SD, Brown EJ, Watt SM, Simmons DL (1996) Identification of alpha v beta 3 as a heterotypic ligand for CD31/PECAM-1. J Cell Sci 109(Pt 2):437–445PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Buensuceso CS, Obergfell A, Soriani A, Eto K, Kiosses WB, Arias-Salgado EG, Kawakami T, Shattil SJ (2005) Regulation of outside-in signaling in platelets by integrin-associated protein kinase C beta. J Biol Chem 280:644–653PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Butt E, Abel K, Krieger M, Palm D, Hoppe V, Hoppe J, Walter U (1994) cAMP- and cGMP-dependent protein kinase phosphorylation sites of the focal adhesion vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein (VASP) in vitro and in intact human platelets. J Biol Chem 269:14509–14517PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Bynagari YS, Nagy B Jr, Tuluc F, Bhavaraju K, Kim S, Vijayan KV, Kunapuli SP (2009) Mechanism of activation and functional role of protein kinase Ceta in human platelets. J Biol Chem 284:13413–13421PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Cao MY, Huber M, Beauchemin N, Famiglietti J, Albelda SM, Veillette A (1998) Regulation of mouse PECAM-1 tyrosine phosphorylation by the Src and Csk families of protein-tyrosine kinases. J Biol Chem 273:15765–15772PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Cavallini L, Coassin M, Borean A, Alexandre A (1996) Prostacyclin and sodium nitroprusside inhibit the activity of the platelet inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate receptor and promote its phosphorylation. J Biol Chem 271:5545–5551PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Chari R, Getz T, Nagy B Jr, Bhavaraju K, Mao Y, Bynagari YS, Murugappan S, Nakayama K, Kunapuli SP (2009) Protein kinase C[delta] differentially regulates platelet functional responses. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 29:699–705PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Chiba R, Nakagawa N, Kurasawa K, Tanaka Y, Saito Y, Iwamoto I (1999) Ligation of CD31 (PECAM-1) on endothelial cells increases adhesive function of alphavbeta3 integrin and enhances beta1 integrin-mediated adhesion of eosinophils to endothelial cells. Blood 94:1319–1329PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Chirkov YY, Horowitz JD (2007) Impaired tissue responsiveness to organic nitrates and nitric oxide: a new therapeutic frontier? Pharmacol Ther 116:287–305PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Chrzanowska-Wodnicka M, Smyth SS, Schoenwaelder SM, Fischer TH, White GC, 2ND (2005) Rap1b is required for normal platelet function and hemostasis in mice. J Clin Invest 115:680–687PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Cicmil M, Thomas JM, Sage T, Barry FA, Leduc M, Bon C, Gibbins JM (2000) Collagen, convulxin, and thrombin stimulate aggregation-independent tyrosine phosphorylation of CD31 in platelets. Evidence for the involvement of Src family kinases. J Biol Chem 275:27339–27347PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Cicmil M, Thomas JM, Leduc M, Bon C, Gibbins JM (2002) Platelet endothelial cell adhesion molecule-1 signaling inhibits the activation of human platelets. Blood 99:137–144PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Cohen S, Braiman A, Shubinsky G, Isakov N (2011) Protein kinase C-theta in platelet activation. FEBS Lett 585:3208–3215PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Coxon CH, Sadler AJ, Huo J, Campbell RD (2012) An investigation of hierarchical protein recruitment to the inhibitory platelet receptor, G6B-b. PLoS One 7, e49543PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Cozzi MR, Guglielmini G, Battiston M, Momi S, Lombardi E, Miller EC, de Zanet D, Mazzucato M, Gresele P, de Marco L (2015) Visualization of nitric oxide production by individual platelets during adhesion in flowing blood. Blood 125:697–705PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Crittenden JR, Bergmeier W, Zhang Y, Piffath CL, Liang Y, Wagner DD, Housman DE, Graybiel AM (2004) CalDAG-GEFI integrates signaling for platelet aggregation and thrombus formation. Nat Med 10:982–986PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Cunningham MR, Nisar SP, Mundell SJ (2013) Molecular mechanisms of platelet P2Y(12) receptor regulation. Biochem Soc Trans 41:225–230PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. de Vet EC, Aguado B, Campbell RD (2001) G6b, a novel immunoglobulin superfamily member encoded in the human major histocompatibility complex, interacts with SHP-1 and SHP-2. J Biol Chem 276:42070–42076PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Dormandy JA, Charbonnel B, Eckland DJA, Erdmann E, Massi-Benedetti M, Moules IK, Skene AM, Tan MH, Lefèbvre PJ, Murray GD, Standl E, Wilcox RG, Wilhelmsen L, Betteridge J, Birkeland K, Golay A, Heine RJ, Korányi L, Laakso M, Mokáň M, Norkus A, Pirags V, Podar T, Scheen A, Scherbaum W, Schernthaner G, Schmitz O, Škrha J, Smith U, Tatoň J (2005) Secondary prevention of macrovascular events in patients with type 2 diabetes in the PROactive Study (PROspective pioglitAzone Clinical Trial In macroVascular Events): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 366:1279–1289PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Dutta-Roy AK, Sinha AK (1987) Purification and properties of prostaglandin E1/prostacyclin receptor of human blood platelets. J Biol Chem 262:12685–12691PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Eigenthaler M, Ullrich H, Geiger J, Horstrup K, Honig-Liedl P, Wiebecke D, Walter U (1993) Defective nitrovasodilator-stimulated protein phosphorylation and calcium regulation in cGMP-dependent protein kinase-deficient human platelets of chronic myelocytic leukemia. J Biol Chem 268:13526–13531PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Falati S, Patil S, Gross PL, Stapleton M, Merrill-Skoloff G, Barrett NE, Pixton KL, Weiler H, Cooley B, Newman DK, Newman PJ, Furie BC, Furie B, Gibbins JM (2006) Platelet PECAM-1 inhibits thrombus formation in vivo. Blood 107:535–541PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Fan X, Shi P, Dai J, Lu Y, Chen X, Liu X, Zhang K, Wu X, Sun Y, Wang K, Zhu L, Zhang CC, Zhang J, Chen GQ, Zheng J, Liu J (2014) Paired immunoglobulin-like receptor B regulates platelet activation. Blood 124:2421–2430PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Forman BM, Chen J, Evans RM (1997) Hypolipidemic drugs, polyunsaturated fatty acids, and eicosanoids are ligands for peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors alpha and delta. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 94:4312–4317PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Gabbi C, Warner M, Gustafsson J (2014) Action mechanisms of Liver X Receptors. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 446:647–650PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Gambaryan S, Kobsar A, Hartmann S, Birschmann I, Kuhlencordt PJ, Muller-Esterl W, Lohmann SM, Walter U (2008) NO-synthase-/NO-independent regulation of human and murine platelet soluble guanylyl cyclase activity. J Thromb Haemost 6:1376–1384PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Gambaryan S, Kobsar A, Rukoyatkina N, Herterich S, Geiger J, Smolenski A, Lohmann SM, Walter U (2010) Thrombin and collagen induce a feedback inhibitory signaling pathway in platelets involving dissociation of the catalytic subunit of protein kinase A from an NFkappaB-IkappaB complex. J Biol Chem 285:18352–18363PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Gilio K, Harper MT, Cosemans JM, Konopatskaya O, Munnix IC, Prinzen L, Leitges M, Liu Q, Molkentin JD, Heemskerk JW, Poole AW (2010) Functional divergence of platelet protein kinase C (PKC) isoforms in thrombus formation on collagen. J Biol Chem 285:23410–23419PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Gkaliagkousi E, Ritter J, Ferro A (2007) Platelet-derived nitric oxide signaling and regulation. Circ Res 101:654–662PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Goodwin AM, Sullivan KM, D’Amore PA (2006) Cultured endothelial cells display endogenous activation of the canonical Wnt signaling pathway and express multiple ligands, receptors, and secreted modulators of Wnt signaling. Dev Dyn 235:3110–3120PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Gorman RR, Bunting S, Miller OV (1977) Modulation of human platelet adenylate cyclase by prostacyclin (PGX). Prostaglandins 13:377–388PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Goyert SM, Ferrero EM, Seremetis SV, Winchester RJ, Silver J, Mattison AC (1986) Biochemistry and expression of myelomonocytic antigens. J Immunol 137:3909–3914PubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Gushiken FC, Patel V, Liu Y, Pradhan S, Bergeron AL, Peng Y, Vijayan KV (2008) Protein phosphatase 2A negatively regulates integrin alpha(IIb)beta(3) signaling. J Biol Chem 283:12862–12869PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Hall RA, Ostedgaard LS, Premont RT, Blitzer JT, Rahman N, Welsh MJ, Lefkowitz RJ (1998) A C-terminal motif found in the beta2-adrenergic receptor, P2Y1 receptor and cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator determines binding to the Na+/H+ exchanger regulatory factor family of PDZ proteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 95:8496–8501PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Hall KJ, Harper MT, Gilio K, Cosemans JM, Heemskerk JW, Poole AW (2008) Genetic analysis of the role of protein kinase Ctheta in platelet function and thrombus formation. PLoS One 3, e3277PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Hardy AR, Conley PB, Luo J, Benovic JL, Poole AW, Mundell SJ (2005) P2Y1 and P2Y12 receptors for ADP desensitize by distinct kinase-dependent mechanisms. Blood 105:3552–3560PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Harper MT, Poole AW (2009) PKCtheta in platelet activation. Blood 114:489–491, author reply 491-2PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Harper MT, Poole AW (2010) Diverse functions of protein kinase C isoforms in platelet activation and thrombus formation. J Thromb Haemost 8:454–462PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Haslam RJ, Dickinson NT, Jang EK (1999) Cyclic nucleotides and phosphodiesterases in platelets. Thromb Haemost 82:412–423PubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Henshall TL, Jones KL, Wilkinson R, Jackson DE (2001) Src homology 2 domain-containing protein-tyrosine phosphatases, SHP-1 and SHP-2, are required for platelet endothelial cell adhesion molecule-1/CD31-mediated inhibitory signaling. J Immunol 166:3098–3106PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Hidari KI, Weyrich AS, Zimmerman GA, Mcever RP (1997) Engagement of P-selectin glycoprotein ligand-1 enhances tyrosine phosphorylation and activates mitogen-activated protein kinases in human neutrophils. J Biol Chem 272:28750–28756PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Huang H, He X (2008) Wnt/beta-catenin signaling: new (and old) players and new insights. Curr Opin Cell Biol 20:119–125PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Jackson DE, Kupcho KR, Newman PJ (1997) Characterization of phosphotyrosine binding motifs in the cytoplasmic domain of platelet/endothelial cell adhesion molecule-1 (PECAM-1) that are required for the cellular association and activation of the protein-tyrosine phosphatase, SHP-2. J Biol Chem 272:24868–24875PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Jantzen HM, Milstone DS, Gousset L, Conley PB, Mortensen RM (2001) Impaired activation of murine platelets lacking G alpha(i2). J Clin Invest 108:477–483PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Jones KL, Hughan SC, Dopheide SM, Farndale RW, Jackson SP, Jackson DE (2001) Platelet endothelial cell adhesion molecule-1 is a negative regulator of platelet-collagen interactions. Blood 98:1456–1463PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Jones CI, Garner SF, Moraes LA, Kaiser WJ, Rankin A, Bloodomics C, Ouwehand WH, Goodall AH, Gibbins JM (2009) PECAM-1 expression and activity negatively regulate multiple platelet signaling pathways. FEBS Lett 583:3618–3624PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Jones CI, Barrett NE, Moraes LA, Gibbins JM, Jackson DE (2012) Endogenous inhibitory mechanisms and the regulation of platelet function. Methods Mol Biol 788:341–366PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Jones CI, Sage T, Moraes LA, Vaiyapuri S, Hussain U, Tucker KL, Barrett NE, Gibbins JM (2014) Platelet endothelial cell adhesion molecule-1 inhibits platelet response to thrombin and von Willebrand factor by regulating the internalization of glycoprotein Ib via AKT/glycogen synthase kinase-3/dynamin and integrin alphaIIbbeta3. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 34:1968–1976PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Joseph SB, Mckilligin E, Pei L, Watson MA, Collins AR, Laffitte BA, Chen M, Noh G, Goodman J, Hagger GN, Tran J, Tippin TK, Wang X, Lusis AJ, Hsueh WA, Law RE, Collins JL, Willson TM, Tontonoz P (2002) Synthetic LXR ligand inhibits the development of atherosclerosis in mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 99:7604–7609PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Karshovska E, Zhao Z, Blanchet X, Schmitt MM, Bidzhekov K, Soehnlein O, von Hundelshausen P, Mattheij NJ, Cosemans JM, Megens RT, Koeppel TA, Schober A, Hackeng TM, Weber C, Koenen RR (2015) Hyperreactivity of junctional adhesion molecule A-deficient platelets accelerates atherosclerosis in hyperlipidemic mice. Circ Res 116:587–599PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Kashiwagi H, Shiraga M, Kato H, Kamae T, Yamamoto N, Tadokoro S, Kurata Y, Tomiyama Y, Kanakura Y (2005) Negative regulation of platelet function by a secreted cell repulsive protein, semaphorin 3A. Blood 106:913–921PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Kersten S, Desvergne B, Wahli W (2000) Roles of PPARs in health and disease. Nature 405:421–424PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Kharitonenkov A, Chen Z, Sures I, Wang H, Schilling J, Ullrich A (1997) A family of proteins that inhibit signalling through tyrosine kinase receptors. Nature 386:181–186PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Konopatskaya O, Gilio K, Harper MT, Zhao Y, Cosemans JM, Karim ZA, Whiteheart SW, Molkentin JD, Verkade P, Watson SP, Heemskerk JW, Poole AW (2009) PKCalpha regulates platelet granule secretion and thrombus formation in mice. J Clin Invest 119:399–407PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  67. Laurent PA, Severin S, Gratacap MP, Payrastre B (2014) Class I PI 3-kinases signaling in platelet activation and thrombosis: PDK1/Akt/GSK3 axis and impact of PTEN and SHIP1. Adv Biol Regul 54:162–174PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Leavesley DI, Oliver JM, Swart BW, Berndt MC, Haylock DN, Simmons PJ (1994) Signals from platelet/endothelial cell adhesion molecule enhance the adhesive activity of the very late antigen-4 integrin of human CD34+ hemopoietic progenitor cells. J Immunol 153:4673–4683PubMedGoogle Scholar
  69. Lee CH, Chawla A, Urbiztondo N, Liao D, Boisvert WA, Evans RM, Curtiss LK (2003) Transcriptional repression of atherogenic inflammation: modulation by PPARdelta. Science 302:453–457PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Li D, Chen K, Sinha N, Zhang X, Wang Y, Sinha AK, Romeo F, Mehta JL (2005) The effects of PPAR-gamma ligand pioglitazone on platelet aggregation and arterial thrombus formation. Cardiovasc Res 65:907–912PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Lyons AB, Cooper SJ, Cole SR, Ashman LK (1988) Human myeloid differentiation antigens identified by monoclonal antibodies to the myelomonocytic leukemia cell line RC-2A. Pathology 20:137–146PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Ma P, Cierniewska A, Signarvic R, Cieslak M, Kong H, Sinnamon AJ, Neubig RR, Newman DK, Stalker TJ, Brass LF (2012) A newly identified complex of spinophilin and the tyrosine phosphatase, SHP-1, modulates platelet activation by regulating G protein-dependent signaling. Blood 119:1935–1945PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Macaulay IC, Tijssen MR, Thijssen-Timmer DC, Gusnanto A, Steward M, Burns P, Langford CF, Ellis PD, Dudbridge F, Zwaginga JJ, Watkins NA, van der Schoot CE, Ouwehand WH (2007) Comparative gene expression profiling of in vitro differentiated megakaryocytes and erythroblasts identifies novel activatory and inhibitory platelet membrane proteins. Blood 109:3260–3269PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. MacDonald BT, Semenov MV, He X (2007) SnapShot: Wnt/beta-catenin signaling. Cell 131:1204PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Manganello JM, Djellas Y, Borg C, Antonakis K, Le Breton GC (1999) Cyclic AMP-dependent phosphorylation of thromboxane A(2) receptor-associated Galpha(13). J Biol Chem 274:28003–28010PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Massberg S, Sausbier M, Klatt P, Bauer M, Pfeifer A, Siess W, Fassler R, Ruth P, Krombach F, Hofmann F (1999) Increased adhesion and aggregation of platelets lacking cyclic guanosine 3′,5′-monophosphate kinase I. J Exp Med 189:1255–1264PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Mayanglambam A, Bhavanasi D, Vijayan KV, Kunapuli SP (2011) Differential dephosphorylation of the protein kinase C-zeta (PKCzeta) in an integrin alphaIIbbeta3-dependent manner in platelets. Biochem Pharmacol 82:505–513PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Mazharian A, Wang YJ, Mori J, Bem D, Finney B, Heising S, Gissen P, White JG, Berndt MC, Gardiner EE, Nieswandt B, Douglas MR, Campbell RD, Watson SP, Senis YA (2012) Mice lacking the ITIM-containing receptor G6b-B exhibit macrothrombocytopenia and aberrant platelet function. Sci Signal 5:78–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Mazharian A, Mori J, Wang YJ, Heising S, Neel BG, Watson SP, Senis YA (2013) Megakaryocyte-specific deletion of the protein-tyrosine phosphatases Shp1 and Shp2 causes abnormal megakaryocyte development, platelet production, and function. Blood 121:4205–4220PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Mellion BT, Ignarro LJ, Ohlstein EH, Pontecorvo EG, Hyman AL, Kadowitz PJ (1981) Evidence for the inhibitory role of guanosine 3′, 5′-monophosphate in ADP-induced human platelet aggregation in the presence of nitric oxide and related vasodilators. Blood 57:946–955PubMedGoogle Scholar
  81. Mellor H, Parker PJ (1998) The extended protein kinase C superfamily. Biochem J 332(Pt 2):281–292PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Metzelaar MJ, Korteweg J, Sixma JJ, Nieuwenhuis HK (1991) Biochemical characterization of PECAM-1 (CD31 antigen) on human platelets. Thromb Haemost 66:700–707PubMedGoogle Scholar
  83. Miura Y, Kaibuchi K, Itoh T, Corbin JD, Francis SH, Takai Y (1992) Phosphorylation of smg p21B/rap1B p21 by cyclic GMP-dependent protein kinase. FEBS Lett 297:171–174PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Modderman PW, von dem Borne AE, Sonnenberg A (1994) Tyrosine phosphorylation of P-selectin in intact platelets and in a disulphide-linked complex with immunoprecipitated pp60c-src. Biochem J 299(Pt 3):613–621PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Momi S, Caracchini R, Falcinelli E, Evangelista S, Gresele P (2014) Stimulation of platelet nitric oxide production by nebivolol prevents thrombosis. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 34:820–829PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Moraes LA, Paul-Clark MJ, Rickman A, Flower RJ, Goulding NJ, Perretti M (2005a) Ligand-specific glucocorticoid receptor activation in human platelets. Blood 106:4167–4175PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Moraes LA, Paul-Clark MJ, Rickman A, Flower RJ, Goulding NJ, Perretti M (2005b) Ligand-specific glucocorticoid receptor activation in human platelets. Blood 106:4167–4175PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Moraes LA, Swales KE, Wray JA, Damazo A, Gibbins JM, Warner TD, Bishop-Bailey D (2007) Nongenomic signaling of the retinoid X receptor through binding and inhibiting Gq in human platelets. Blood 109:3741–3744PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Moraes LA, Barrett NE, Jones CI, Holbrook LM, Spyridon M, Sage T, Newman DK, Gibbins JM (2010a) Platelet endothelial cell adhesion molecule-1 regulates collagen-stimulated platelet function by modulating the association of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase with Grb-2-associated binding protein-1 and linker for activation of T cells. J Thromb Haemost 8:2530–2541PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Moraes LA, Spyridon M, Kaiser WJ, Jones C, Sage T, Atherton R, Gibbins JM (2010b) Non‐genomic effects of PPARγ ligands: inhibition of GPVI‐stimulated platelet activation. J Thromb Haemost 8:577–587PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Moraes LA, Spyridon M, Kaiser WJ, Jones CI, Sage T, Atherton RE, Gibbins JM (2010c) Non-genomic effects of PPARgamma ligands: inhibition of GPVI-stimulated platelet activation. J Thromb Haemost 8:577–587PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Moraes LA, Vaiyapuri S, Sasikumar P, Ali MS, Kriek N, Sage T, Gibbins JM (2013) Antithrombotic actions of statins involve PECAM-1 signaling. Blood 122:3188–3196PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Mori J, Pearce AC, Spalton JC, Grygielska B, Eble JA, Tomlinson MG, Senis YA, Watson SP (2008) G6b-B inhibits constitutive and agonist-induced signaling by glycoprotein VI and CLEC-2. J Biol Chem 283:35419–35427PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Mundell SJ, Jones ML, Hardy AR, Barton JF, Beaucourt SM, Conley PB, Poole AW (2006) Distinct roles for protein kinase C isoforms in regulating platelet purinergic receptor function. Mol Pharmacol 70:1132–1142PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Murugappan S, Tuluc F, Dorsam RT, Shankar H, Kunapuli SP (2004) Differential role of protein kinase C delta isoform in agonist-induced dense granule secretion in human platelets. J Biol Chem 279:2360–2367PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Nagaishi T, Pao L, Lin SH, Iijima H, Kaser A, Qiao SW, Chen Z, Glickman J, Najjar SM, Nakajima A, Neel BG, Blumberg RS (2006) SHP1 phosphatase-dependent T cell inhibition by CEACAM1 adhesion molecule isoforms. Immunity 25:769–781PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Nagy B Jr, Bhavaraju K, Getz T, Bynagari YS, Kim S, Kunapuli SP (2009) Impaired activation of platelets lacking protein kinase C-theta isoform. Blood 113:2557–2567PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Naik MU, Stalker TJ, Brass LF, Naik UP (2012) JAM-A protects from thrombosis by suppressing integrin alphaIIbbeta3-dependent outside-in signaling in platelets. Blood 119:3352–3360PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Naik MU, Caplan JL, Naik UP (2014) Junctional adhesion molecule-A suppresses platelet integrin alphaIIbbeta3 signaling by recruiting Csk to the integrin-c-Src complex. Blood 123:1393–1402PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Nasdala I, Wolburg-Buchholz K, Wolburg H, Kuhn A, Ebnet K, Brachtendorf G, Samulowitz U, Kuster B, Engelhardt B, Vestweber D, Butz S (2002) A transmembrane tight junction protein selectively expressed on endothelial cells and platelets. J Biol Chem 277:16294–16303PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Newland SA, Macaulay IC, Floto AR, de Vet EC, Ouwehand WH, Watkins NA, Lyons PA, Campbell DR (2007) The novel inhibitory receptor G6B is expressed on the surface of platelets and attenuates platelet function in vitro. Blood 109:4806–4809PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Newman PJ (1997) The biology of PECAM-1. J Clin Investig 100:S25–S29PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. Newton AC (1997) Regulation of protein kinase C. Curr Opin Cell Biol 9:161–167PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Newton JP, Buckley CD, Jones EY, Simmons DL (1997) Residues on both faces of the first immunoglobulin fold contribute to hemophilic binding sites of PECAM-1/CD31. J Biol Chem 272:20555–20563PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. O’Brien JJ, Ray DM, Spinelli SL, Blumberg N, Taubman MB, Francis CW, Wittlin SD, Phipps RP (2007) The platelet as a therapeutic target for treating vascular diseases and the role of eicosanoid and synthetic PPARγ ligands. Prostaglandins Other Lipid Mediat 82:68–76PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. Pears CJ, Thornber K, Auger JM, Hughes CE, Grygielska B, Protty MB, Pearce AC, Watson SP (2008) Differential roles of the PKC novel isoforms, PKCdelta and PKCepsilon, in mouse and human platelets. PLoS One 3, e3793PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. Piali L, Albelda SM, Baldwin HS, Hammel P, Gisler RH, Imhof BA (1993) Murine platelet endothelial cell adhesion molecule (PECAM-1)/CD31 modulates beta 2 integrins on lymphokine-activated killer cells. Eur J Immunol 23:2464–2471PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  108. Pradhan S, Alrehani N, Patel V, Khatlani T, Vijayan KV (2010) Cross-talk between serine/threonine protein phosphatase 2A and protein tyrosine phosphatase 1B regulates Src activation and adhesion of integrin alphaIIbbeta3 to fibrinogen. J Biol Chem 285:29059–29068PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  109. Pula G, Schuh K, Nakayama K, Nakayama KI, Walter U, Poole AW (2006) PKCdelta regulates collagen-induced platelet aggregation through inhibition of VASP-mediated filopodia formation. Blood 108:4035–4044PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  110. Pumphrey NJ, Taylor V, Freeman S, Douglas MR, Bradfield PF, Young SP, Lord JM, Wakelam MJ, Bird IN, Salmon M, Buckley CD (1999) Differential association of cytoplasmic signalling molecules SHP-1, SHP-2, SHIP and phospholipase C-gamma1 with PECAM-1/CD31. FEBS Lett 450:77–83PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  111. Radomski MW, Palmer RM, Moncada S (1987) Comparative pharmacology of endothelium-derived relaxing factor, nitric oxide and prostacyclin in platelets. Br J Pharmacol 92:181–187PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  112. Radomski MW, Palmer RM, Moncada S (1990a) Characterization of the L-arginine:nitric oxide pathway in human platelets. Br J Pharmacol 101:325–328PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  113. Radomski MW, Palmer RM, Moncada S (1990b) An L-arginine/nitric oxide pathway present in human platelets regulates aggregation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 87:5193–5197PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  114. Rathore V, Stapleton MA, Hillery CA, Montgomery RR, Nichols TC, Merricks EP, Newman DK, Newman PJ (2003) PECAM-1 negatively regulates GPIb/V/IX signaling in murine platelets. Blood 102:3658–3664PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  115. Reid HM, Kinsella BT (2003) The alpha, but not the beta, isoform of the human thromboxane A2 receptor is a target for nitric oxide-mediated desensitization. Independent modulation of Tp alpha signaling by nitric oxide and prostacyclin. J Biol Chem 278:51190–51202PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  116. Relou IA, Gorter G, Ferreira IA, van Rijn HJ, Akkerman JW (2003) Platelet endothelial cell adhesion molecule-1 (PECAM-1) inhibits low density lipoprotein-induced signaling in platelets. J Biol Chem 278:32638–32644PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  117. Robitaille J, Izzi L, Daniels E, Zelus B, Holmes KV, Beauchemin N (1999) Comparison of expression patterns and cell adhesion properties of the mouse biliary glycoproteins Bbgp1 and Bbgp2. Eur J Biochem 264:534–544PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  118. Rochdi MD, Watier V, La Madeleine C, Nakata H, Kozasa T, Parent JL (2002) Regulation of GTP-binding protein alpha q (Galpha q) signaling by the ezrin-radixin-moesin-binding phosphoprotein-50 (EBP50). J Biol Chem 277:40751–40759PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  119. Russo I, Traversa M, Bonomo K, De Salve A, Mattiello L, Del Mese P, Doronzo G, Cavalot F, Trovati M, Anfossi G (2010) In central obesity, weight loss restores platelet sensitivity to nitric oxide and prostacyclin. Obesity (Silver Spring) 18:788–797CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  120. Salaheldeen E, Kurio H, Howida A, Iida H (2012) Molecular cloning and localization of a CEACAM2 isoform, CEACAM2-L, expressed in spermatids in mouse testis. Mol Reprod Dev 79:843–852PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  121. Sauer WH, Cappola AR, Berlin JA, Kimmel SE (2006) Insulin sensitizing pharmacotherapy for prevention of myocardial infarction in patients with diabetes mellitus. Am J Cardiol 97:651–654PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  122. Schultess J, Danielewski O, Smolenski AP (2005) Rap1GAP2 is a new GTPase-activating protein of Rap1 expressed in human platelets. Blood 105:3185–3192PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  123. Semenov MV, Habas R, MacDonald BT, He X (2007) SnapShot: noncanonical Wnt signaling pathways. Cell 131:1378–1379PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  124. Senis YA (2013) Protein-tyrosine phosphatases: a new frontier in platelet signal transduction. J Thromb Haemost 11:1800–1813PubMedGoogle Scholar
  125. Senis YA, Tomlinson MG, Garcia A, Dumon S, Heath VL, Herbert J, Cobbold SP, Spalton JC, Ayman S, Antrobus R, Zitzmann N, Bicknell R, Frampton J, Authi KS, Martin A, Wakelam MJ, Watson SP (2007) A comprehensive proteomics and genomics analysis reveals novel transmembrane proteins in human platelets and mouse megakaryocytes including G6b-B, a novel immunoreceptor tyrosine-based inhibitory motif protein. Mol Cell Proteomics 6:548–564PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  126. Serini G, Valdembri D, Zanivan S, Morterra G, Burkhardt C, Caccavari F, Zammataro L, Primo L, Tamagnone L, Logan M, Tessier-Lavigne M, Taniguchi M, Puschel AW, Bussolino F (2003) Class 3 semaphorins control vascular morphogenesis by inhibiting integrin function. Nature 424:391–397PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  127. Shenolikar S, Voltz JW, Cunningham R, Weinman EJ (2004) Regulation of ion transport by the NHERF family of PDZ proteins. Physiology (Bethesda) 19:362–369CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  128. Sidhu JS, Cowan D, Tooze JA, Kaski J-C (2004) Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-γ agonist rosiglitazone reduces circulating platelet activity in patients without diabetes mellitus who have coronary artery disease. Am Heart J 147:1032–1037CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  129. Smolenski A (2012) Novel roles of cAMP/cGMP-dependent signaling in platelets. J Thromb Haemost 10:167–176PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  130. Spyridon M, Moraes LA, Jones CI, Sage T, Sasikumar P, Bucci G, Gibbins JM (2011) LXR as a novel antithrombotic target. Blood 117:5751–5761PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  131. Stalker TJ, Wu J, Morgans A, Traxler EA, Wang L, Chatterjee MS, Lee D, Quertermous T, Hall RA, Hammer DA, Diamond SL, Brass LF (2009) Endothelial cell specific adhesion molecule (ESAM) localizes to platelet-platelet contacts and regulates thrombus formation in vivo. J Thromb Haemost 7:1886–1896PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  132. Steele BM, Harper MT, Macaulay IC, Morrell CN, Perez-Tamayo A, Foy M, Habas R, Poole AW, Fitzgerald DJ, Maguire PB (2009) Canonical Wnt signaling negatively regulates platelet function. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 106:19836–19841PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  133. Steele BM, Harper MT, Smolenski AP, Alkazemi N, Poole AW, Fitzgerald DJ, Maguire PB (2012) WNT-3a modulates platelet function by regulating small GTPase activity. FEBS Lett 586:2267–2272PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  134. Stefanini L, Boulaftali Y, Ouellette TD, Holinstat M, Desire L, Leblond B, Andre P, Conley PB, Bergmeier W (2012) Rap1-Rac1 circuits potentiate platelet activation. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 32:434–441PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  135. Stefanini L, Paul DS, Robledo RF, Chan ER, Getz TM, Campbell RA, Kechele DO, Casari C, Piatt R, Caron KM, Mackman N, Weyrich AS, Parrott MC, Boulaftali Y, Adams MD, Peters LL, Bergmeier W (2015) RASA3 is a critical inhibitor of RAP1-dependent platelet activation. J Clin Invest 125:1419–1432PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  136. Sun QH, Delisser HM, Zukowski MM, Paddock C, Albelda SM, Newman PJ (1996) Individually distinct Ig homology domains in PECAM-1 regulate hemophilic binding and modulate receptor affinity. J Biol Chem 271:11090–11098PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  137. Takahashi T, Fournier A, Nakamura F, Wang LH, Murakami Y, Kalb RG, Fujisawa H, Strittmatter SM (1999) Plexin-neuropilin-1 complexes form functional semaphorin-3A receptors. Cell 99:59–69PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  138. Takai T (2005) Paired immunoglobulin-like receptors and their MHC class I recognition. Immunology 115:433–440PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  139. Tamagnone L, Artigiani S, Chen H, He Z, Ming GI, Song H, Chedotal A, Winberg ML, Goodman CS, Poo M, Tessier-Lavigne M, Comoglio PM (1999) Plexins are a large family of receptors for transmembrane, secreted, and GPI-anchored semaphorins in vertebrates. Cell 99:71–80PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  140. Tanaka Y, Albelda SM, Horgan KJ, van Seventer GA, Shimizu Y, Newman W, Hallam J, Newman PJ, Buck CA, Shaw S (1992) CD31 expressed on distinctive T cell subsets is a preferential amplifier of beta 1 integrin-mediated adhesion. J Exp Med 176:245–253PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  141. Tangirala RK, Bischoff ED, Joseph SB, Wagner BL, Walczak R, Laffitte BA, Daige CL, Thomas D, Heyman RA, Mangelsdorf DJ, Wang X, Lusis AJ, Tontonoz P, Schulman IG (2002) Identification of macrophage liver X receptors as inhibitors of atherosclerosis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 99:11896–11901PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  142. Thai le M, Ashman LK, Harbour SN, Hogarth PM, Jackson DE (2003) Physical proximity and functional interplay of PECAM-1 with the Fc receptor Fc gamma RIIa on the platelet plasma membrane. Blood 102:3637–3645PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  143. Thai LM, Ashman LK, Harbour SN, Hogarth PM, Jackson DE (2003) Physical proximity and functional interplay of PECAM-1 with the Fc receptor Fc gamma RIIa on the platelet plasma membrane. Blood 102:3637–3645CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  144. Thomas G, Farhat MY, Ramwell PW (1990) Effect of L-arginine and substituted arginine compounds on platelet aggregation: role of endothelium. Thromb Res 60:425–429PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  145. Thomas DH, Getz TM, Newman TN, Dangelmaier CA, Carpino N, Kunapuli SP, Tsygankov AY, Daniel JL (2010) A novel histidine tyrosine phosphatase, TULA-2, associates with Syk and negatively regulates GPVI signaling in platelets. Blood 116:2570–2578PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  146. Thompson NT, Scrutton MC, Wallis RB (1986) Particle volume changes associated with light transmittance changes in the platelet aggregometer: dependence upon aggregating agent and effectiveness of stimulus. Thromb Res 41:615–626PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  147. Tymvios C, Moore C, Jones S, Solomon A, Sanz-Rosa D, Emerson M (2009) Platelet aggregation responses are critically regulated in vivo by endogenous nitric oxide but not by endothelial nitric oxide synthase. Br J Pharmacol 158:1735–1742PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  148. Unsworth AJ, Finney BA, Navarro-Nunez L, Severin S, Watson SP, Pears CJ (2012) Protein kinase Cepsilon and protein kinase Ctheta double-deficient mice have a bleeding diathesis. J Thromb Haemost 10:1887–1894PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  149. van Geet C, Izzi B, Labarque V, Freson K (2009) Human platelet pathology related to defects in the G-protein signaling cascade. J Thromb Haemost 7(Suppl 1):282–286PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  150. Varon D, Jackson DE, Shenkman B, Dardik R, Tamarin I, Savion N, Newman PJ (1998) Platelet/endothelial cell adhesion molecule-1 serves as a costimulatory agonist receptor that modulates integrin-dependent adhesion and aggregation of human platelets. Blood 91:500–507PubMedGoogle Scholar
  151. Viennois E, Pommier AJ, Mouzat K, Oumeddour A, Hajjaji F-ZE, Dufour J, Caira F, Volle DH, Baron S, Lobaccaro J-MA (2011) Targeting liver X receptors in human health: deadlock or promising trail? Expert Opin Ther Targets 15:219–232PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  152. Viennois E, Mouzat K, Dufour J, Morel L, Lobaccaro J-M, Baron S (2012) Selective liver X receptor modulators (SLiMs): what use in human health? Mol Cell Endocrinol 351:129–141PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  153. Waldmann R, Nieberding M, Walter U (1987) Vasodilator-stimulated protein phosphorylation in platelets is mediated by cAMP- and cGMP-dependent protein kinases. Eur J Biochem 167:441–448PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  154. Wardell MR, Reynolds CC, Berndt MC, Wallace RW, Fox JE (1989) Platelet glycoprotein Ib beta is phosphorylated on serine 166 by cyclic AMP-dependent protein kinase. J Biol Chem 264:15656–15661PubMedGoogle Scholar
  155. Wee JL, Jackson DE (2005) The Ig-ITIM superfamily member PECAM-1 regulates the “outside-in” signaling properties of integrin alpha(IIb)beta3 in platelets. Blood 106:3816–3823PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  156. Wójcicka G, Jamroz-Wiśniewska A, Horoszewicz K, Bełtowski J (2015) Liver X receptors (LXRs). Part I: structure, function, regulation of activity, and role in lipid metabolism Receptory wątrobowe X (LXR). Część I: Budowa, funkcja, regulacja aktywności i znaczenie w metabolizmie lipidów. Journal Cover 69Google Scholar
  157. Wong C, Liu Y, Yip J, Chand R, Wee JL, Oates L, Nieswandt B, Reheman A, Ni H, Beauchemin N, Jackson DE (2009) CEACAM1 negatively regulates platelet-collagen interactions and thrombus growth in vitro and in vivo. Blood 113:1818–1828PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  158. Wu XW, Lian EC (1997) Binding properties and inhibition of platelet aggregation by a monoclonal antibody to CD31 (PECAM-1). Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 17:3154–3158Google Scholar
  159. Yang J, Wu J, Jiang H, Mortensen R, Austin S, Manning DR, Woulfe D, Brass LF (2002) Signaling through Gi family members in platelets. Redundancy and specificity in the regulation of adenylyl cyclase and other effectors. J Biol Chem 277:46035–46042PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  160. Yip J, Alshahrani M, Beauchemin N, Jackson DE (2015) CEACAM1 regulates integrin alphaIIbbeta3-mediated functions in platelets. Platelets 27(2):1–10Google Scholar
  161. Zhao T, Newman PJ (2001) Integrin activation by regulated dimerization and oligomerization of platelet endothelial cell adhesion molecule (PECAM)-1 from within the cell. J Cell Biol 152:65–73PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  162. Zheng J, Umikawa M, Cui C, Li J, Chen X, Zhang C, Huynh H, Kang X, Silvany R, Wan X, Ye J, Canto AP, Chen SH, Wang HY, Ward ES, Zhang CC (2012) Inhibitory receptors bind ANGPTLs and support blood stem cells and leukaemia development. Nature 485:656–660PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute for Cardiovascular and Metabolic Research, School of Biological SciencesUniversity of ReadingReadingUK

Personalised recommendations