Engagement Detection During Deictic References in Human-Robot Interaction

  • Timo Dankert
  • Michael Goerlich
  • Sebastian Wrede
  • Raphaela Gehle
  • Karola Pitsch
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 9979)

Abstract

Humans are typically skilled interaction partners and detect even small problems during an interaction. In contrast, interactive robot systems often lack the basic capabilities to sense the engagement of their interaction partners and keep a common ground. This becomes even more problematic if humanoid robots with human-like behavior are used as they build up high expectations in terms of their cognitive capabilities. This paper contributes an approach for analyzing human engagement during object references in an explanation scenario based on time series alignment. An experimental guide scenario in a smart home environment was used to collect a training and test dataset where the engagement classification is carried out by human operators. The experiments already performed on the dataset give deeper insights into the presented task and motivate an incremental, mixed modality approach to engagement classification. While some of the results rely on external sensors they give an outlook on the requirements and possibilities for HRI scenarios with next-gen social robots.

Keywords

HRI Engagement detection Pattern recognition 

References

  1. 1.
    Yu, C., Aoki, P.M., Woodruff, A.: Detecting user engagement in everyday conversations. Science, p. 4 (2004)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bohus, D., Horvitz, E.: Learning to predict engagement with a spoken dialog system in open-world settings. In: SIGdial 2009, London, UK (2009)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Yamazaki, K., Yamazaki, A., Okada, M., Kuno, Y., Kobayashi, Y., Hoshi, Y., Pitsch, K., Luff, P., Lehn, D., Heath, C.: Revealing gauguin: engaging visitors in robot guide s explanation in an art museum. In: CHI 2009 Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 1437–1446 (2009)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Jang, M., Ahn, B.K., Park, C., Yang, H.S., Kim, J.H., Cho, Y.J., Lee, D.W., Cho, H.K., Kim, Y.A., Chae, K.: Building an automated engagement recognizer based on video analysis. In: Proceedings of the 2014 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction - HRI 2014, pp. 182–183. ACM Press, New York (2014)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Michalowski, M.P., Simmons, R.: Multimodal person tracking and attention classification. In: Proceeding of the 1st ACM SIGCHI/SIGART Conference on Human-Robot Interaction - HRI 2006, p. 349 (2006)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Rich, C., Ponsler, B., Holroyd, A., Sidner, C.: Recognizing engagement in human-robot interaction. In: 2010 5th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI) (2010)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Holthaus, P., Leichsenring, C., Bernotat, J., Richter, V., Pohling, M., Carlmeyer, B., Köster, N., Meyer zu Borgsen, S., Zorn, R., Schiffhauer, B., Engelmann, K.F., Lier, F., Schulz, S., Cimiano, P., Eyssel, F.A., Hermann, T., Kummert, F., Schlangen, D., Wachsmuth, S., Wagner, P., Wrede, B., Wrede, S.: How to Address Smart Homes with a Social Robot? A Multi-modal Corpus of User Interactions with an Intelligent Environment, European Language Resources Association (ELRA) (2016)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ba, S., Odobez, J.M.: Recognizing visual focus of attention from head pose in natural meetings. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part B (Cybern.) 39(1), 16–33 (2009)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Pitsch, K., Wrede, S.: When a robot orients visitors to an exhibit. Referential practices and interactional dynamics in real world HRI. In: The 23rd IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, pp. 36–42. IEEE (2014)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Wienke, J., Wrede, S.: A middleware for collaborative research in experimental robotics. In: International Symposium on System Integration, Kyoto, Japan (2011)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Timo Dankert
    • 1
  • Michael Goerlich
    • 1
  • Sebastian Wrede
    • 1
  • Raphaela Gehle
    • 2
  • Karola Pitsch
    • 2
  1. 1.CITECBielefeld UniversityBielefeldGermany
  2. 2.University of Duisburg-EssenEssenGermany

Personalised recommendations