Qualitative User Reactions to a Hand-Clapping Humanoid Robot
Playful interactions serve an important role in human development and interpersonal bonding. Accordingly, we believe future robots may need to know how to play games to connect with people in meaningful ways. To begin exploring how users perceive playful human-robot interaction, we conducted a study with 20 participants. Each user played simple hand-clapping games with the Rethink Robotics Baxter Research Robot during a one-hour-long session. Qualitative data collected from surveys and experiment recordings resoundingly demonstrate that this interaction is viable: all users successfully completed the experiment, all users enjoyed at least one game, and nineteen of the 20 users identified at least one potential personal use for Baxter. Hand-clapping tempo was highly salient to users, and human-like robot errors were more widely accepted than mechanical errors. These findings can motivate and guide roboticists who want to design social-physical human-robot interactions.
KeywordsSocial robots physical HRI Social motor coordination
The first author was supported by a National Science Foundation (NSF) Graduate Research Fellowship under Grant No. DGE-0822 and the University of Pennsylvania’s NSF Integrative Graduate Education and Research Traineeship under Grant No. 0966142. We thank Michelle Neuburger for her help with this work; she was supported by NSF Grant No. 1156366. We thank Alex Burka for his design advice and Kostas Daniilidis for access to Baxter.
- 3.Cooney, M.D., Becker-Asano, C., Kanda, T., Alissandrakis, A., Ishiguro, H.: Full-body gesture recognition using inertial sensors for playful interaction with small humanoid robot. In: IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), pp. 2276–2282 (2010)Google Scholar
- 5.Fitter, N.T., Kuchenbecker, K.J.: Equipping the Baxter robot with human-inspired hand-clapping skills. Accepted to the IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN) (2016)Google Scholar
- 9.Huber, M., Rickert, M., Knoll, A., Brandt, T., Glasauer, S.: Human-robot interaction in handing-over tasks. In: IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN), pp. 107–112 (2008)Google Scholar
- 12.Ammi, M., Demulier, V., Caillou, S., Gaffary, Y., Tsalamlal, Y., Martin, J.-C., Tapus, A.: Haptic human-robot affective interaction in a handshaking social protocol. In: ACM/IEEE International Conf. on Human-Robot Interaction, pp. 263–270 (2105)Google Scholar
- 13.Chen, T.L., King, C.-H., Thomaz, A.L., Kemp, C.C.: Touched by a robot: an investigation of subjective responses to robot-initiated touch. In: ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI), pp. 457–464 (2011)Google Scholar
- 16.Kim, Y., Lee, S., Hwang, I., Ro, H., Lee, Y., Moon, M., Song, J.: High5: Promoting interpersonal hand-to-hand touch for vibrant workplace with electrodermal sensor watches. In: ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing, pp. 15–19 (2014)Google Scholar
- 17.Fitter, N.T., Kuchenbecker, K.J.: Designing and assessing expressive open-source faces for the baxter robot. Submitted to the International Conference on Social Robotics (ICSR) (2016)Google Scholar
- 18.Mehrabian, A.: Basic dimensions for a general psychological theory. Oelgeschlager, Gunn & Hain (1980)Google Scholar
- 19.Heerink, M., Krose, B., Evers, V., Wielinga, B.: Measuring acceptance of an assistive social robot: A suggested toolkit. In: IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN), pp. 528–533 (2009)Google Scholar