Advertisement

Qualitative User Reactions to a Hand-Clapping Humanoid Robot

  • Naomi T. FitterEmail author
  • Katherine J. Kuchenbecker
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 9979)

Abstract

Playful interactions serve an important role in human development and interpersonal bonding. Accordingly, we believe future robots may need to know how to play games to connect with people in meaningful ways. To begin exploring how users perceive playful human-robot interaction, we conducted a study with 20 participants. Each user played simple hand-clapping games with the Rethink Robotics Baxter Research Robot during a one-hour-long session. Qualitative data collected from surveys and experiment recordings resoundingly demonstrate that this interaction is viable: all users successfully completed the experiment, all users enjoyed at least one game, and nineteen of the 20 users identified at least one potential personal use for Baxter. Hand-clapping tempo was highly salient to users, and human-like robot errors were more widely accepted than mechanical errors. These findings can motivate and guide roboticists who want to design social-physical human-robot interactions.

Keywords

Social robots physical HRI Social motor coordination 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The first author was supported by a National Science Foundation (NSF) Graduate Research Fellowship under Grant No. DGE-0822 and the University of Pennsylvania’s NSF Integrative Graduate Education and Research Traineeship under Grant No. 0966142. We thank Michelle Neuburger for her help with this work; she was supported by NSF Grant No. 1156366. We thank Alex Burka for his design advice and Kostas Daniilidis for access to Baxter.

References

  1. 1.
    Sonneveld, M.H., Schifferstein, H.N.: The tactual experience of objects. In: Schifferstein, H.N.J., Hekkert, P. (eds.) Product Experience, pp. 41–67. Elsevier, Amsterdam (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kanda, T., Sato, R., Saiwaki, N., Ishiguro, H.: A two-month field trial in an elementary school for long-term human-robot interaction. IEEE Trans. Robot. 23(5), 962–971 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Cooney, M.D., Becker-Asano, C., Kanda, T., Alissandrakis, A., Ishiguro, H.: Full-body gesture recognition using inertial sensors for playful interaction with small humanoid robot. In: IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), pp. 2276–2282 (2010)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Yohanan, S., MacLean, K.E.: The role of affective touch in human-robot interaction: human intent and expectations in touching the Haptic Creature. Int. J. Soc. Robot. 4(2), 163–180 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Fitter, N.T., Kuchenbecker, K.J.: Equipping the Baxter robot with human-inspired hand-clapping skills. Accepted to the IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN) (2016)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Argall, B.D., Billard, A.G.: A survey of tactile human-robot interactions. Robot. Auton. Syst. 58(10), 1159–1176 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Rabbitt, S.M., Kazdin, A.E., Scassellati, B.: Integrating socially assistive robotics into mental healthcare interventions: applications and recommendations for expanded use. Clin. Psychol. Rev. 35, 35–46 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Iwata, H., Sugano, S.: Human-robot-contact-state identification based on tactile recognition. IEEE Trans. Industr. Electron. 52(6), 1468–1477 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Huber, M., Rickert, M., Knoll, A., Brandt, T., Glasauer, S.: Human-robot interaction in handing-over tasks. In: IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN), pp. 107–112 (2008)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Chan, W.P., Parker, C.A., Van der Loos, H.M., Croft, E.A.: A human-inspired object handover controller. Int. J. Robot. Res. 32(8), 971–983 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Avraham, G., Nisky, I., Fernandes, H.L., Acuna, D.E., Kording, K.P., Loeb, G.E., Karniel, A.: Toward perceiving robots as humans: three handshake models face the Turing-like handshake test. IEEE Trans. Haptics 5(3), 196–207 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ammi, M., Demulier, V., Caillou, S., Gaffary, Y., Tsalamlal, Y., Martin, J.-C., Tapus, A.: Haptic human-robot affective interaction in a handshaking social protocol. In: ACM/IEEE International Conf. on Human-Robot Interaction, pp. 263–270 (2105)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Chen, T.L., King, C.-H., Thomaz, A.L., Kemp, C.C.: Touched by a robot: an investigation of subjective responses to robot-initiated touch. In: ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI), pp. 457–464 (2011)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Schmidt, R., Fitzpatrick, P., Caron, R., Mergeche, J.: Understanding social motor coordination. Hum. Mov. Sci. 30(5), 834–845 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Noy, L., Dekel, E., Alon, U.: The mirror game as a paradigm for studying the dynamics of two people improvising motion together. Nat. Acad. Sci. 108(52), 20947–20952 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kim, Y., Lee, S., Hwang, I., Ro, H., Lee, Y., Moon, M., Song, J.: High5: Promoting interpersonal hand-to-hand touch for vibrant workplace with electrodermal sensor watches. In: ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing, pp. 15–19 (2014)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Fitter, N.T., Kuchenbecker, K.J.: Designing and assessing expressive open-source faces for the baxter robot. Submitted to the International Conference on Social Robotics (ICSR) (2016)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Mehrabian, A.: Basic dimensions for a general psychological theory. Oelgeschlager, Gunn & Hain (1980)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Heerink, M., Krose, B., Evers, V., Wielinga, B.: Measuring acceptance of an assistive social robot: A suggested toolkit. In: IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN), pp. 528–533 (2009)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Haptics Group, GRASP Laboratory, Mechanical Engineering and Applied MechanicsUniversity of PennsylvaniaPhiladelphiaUSA

Personalised recommendations