Social Human-Robot Interaction: A New Cognitive and Affective Interaction-Oriented Architecture

  • Carole Adam
  • Wafa Johal
  • Damien Pellier
  • Humbert Fiorino
  • Sylvie Pesty
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 9979)


In this paper, we present CAIO, a Cognitive and Affective Interaction-Oriented architecture for social human-robot interactions (HRI), allowing robots to reason on mental states (including emotions), and to act physically, emotionally and verbally. We also present a short scenario and implementation on a Nao robot.


  1. 1.
    Adam, C.: The emotions: from psychological theories to logical formalisation and implementation in a BDI agent. Ph.D. thesis, INP Toulouse, July 2007Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Adam, C., Herzig, A., Longin, D.: A logical formalization of the OCC theory of emotions. Synthese 168(2), 201–248 (2009)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Adam, C., Longin, D.: Shame, when reasoning and emotions are linked. In: EUMAS 2013 (2013)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Adam, C., Lorini, E.: A BDI emotional reasoning engine for an artificial companion. In: Corchado, J.M., Bajo, J., Kozlak, J., Pawlewski, P., Molina, J.M., Gaudou, B., Julian, V., Unland, R., Lopes, F., Hallenborg, K., García Teodoro, P. (eds.) PAAMS 2014. CCIS, vol. 430, pp. 66–78. Springer, Heidelberg (2014). doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-07767-3_7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Anderson, J.R.: Human symbol manipulation within an integrated cognitive architecture. Cogn. Sci. 29(3), 313–341 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Anderson, J.R., Bower, G.H.: Human Associative Memory. Winston and Sons, Washington, DC (1973)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Baker, M.J.: A model for negotiation in teaching-learning dialogues. J. Artif. Intell. Educ. 5(2), 199–254 (1994)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bates, J.: The role of emotion in believable agents. Commun. ACM 37(7), 122–125 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bratman, M.E.: Intention, Plans, and Practical Reason. Harvard Univ. Press, Cambridge (1987)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Brooks, R.: A robust layered control system for a mobile robot. IEEE J. Robot. Autom. 2(1), 14–23 (1986)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Chong, H.Q., Tan, A.H., Ng, G.W.: Integrated cognitive architectures: a survey. Artif. Intell. Rev. 28(2), 103–130 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Cohen, P.R., Levesque, H.J.: Persistence, intention and commitment. In: Cohen, P., Morgan, J., Pollack, M. (eds.) Intentions in Communication, pp. 33–69. MIT Press, Cambridge (1990)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Guiraud, J., Longin, D., Lorini, E., Pesty, S., Rivière, J.: The face of emotions: a logical formalization of expressive acts. In: International Conference on Autonomous Agent and Multiagent Systems, pp. 1031–1038 (2011)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hogewoning, E., Broekens, J., Eggermont, J., Bovenkamp, E.G.P.: Strategies for affect-controlled action-selection in soar-RL. In: Mira, J., Álvarez, J.R. (eds.) IWINAC 2007. LNCS, vol. 4528, pp. 501–510. Springer, Heidelberg (2007). doi: 10.1007/978-3-540-73055-2_52 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Laird, J.E.: The Soar Cognitive Architecture. MIT Press, Cambridge (2012)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Lallée, S., Pattacini, U., Lemaignan, S., Lenz, A., Melhuish, C., Natale, L., Skachek, S., Hamann, K., Steinwender, J., Sisbot, E., Metta, G., Guitton, J., Alami, R., Warnier, M., Pipe, T., Warneken, F., Dominey, P.: Towards a platform-independent cooperative human robot interaction system: III an architecture for learning and executing actions and shared plans. IEEE Tran. Auton. Ment. Dev. 4(3), 239–253 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Langley, P., Choi, D., Rogers, S.: Interleaving learning, problem solving, and execution in the icarus architecture. Technical report, Computational Learning Laboratory, CSLI, Stanford University (2005)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Langley, P., Laird, J., Rogers, S.: Cognitive architectures: research issues and challenges. Cogn. Syst. Res. 10(2), 141–160 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Novianto, R., Johnston, B., Williams, M.A.: Attention in asmo cognitive architecture. In: 1st International Conference on Biologically Inspired Cognitive Architectures (BICA) (2010)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Pellier, D.: PDDL4J: Planning Domain Description Language Library for Java (2015)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Pellier, D., Fiorino, H., Métivier, M.: Planning when goals change: a moving target search approach. In: International Conference on Advances in Practical Applications of Heterogeneous Multi-Agent Systems (2014)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Perrault, C.R., Allen, J.F.: A plan-based analysis of indirect speech acts. Comput. Linguist. 6(3–4), 167–182 (1980)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Poslad, S.: Specifying protocols for multi-agent systems interaction. ACM Trans. Auton. Adapt. Syst. 2(4) (2007).
  24. 24.
    Rao, A.S., Georgeff, M.P.: Modeling rational agents within a BDI-architecture. In: International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (KR 1991), pp. 473–484 (1991)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Rivière, J.: Interaction affective et expressive Compagnon artificiel - humain. Ph.D. thesis, de Grenoble (2012)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Riviere, J., Adam, C., Pesty, S., Pelachaud, C., Guiraud, N., Longin, D., Lorini, E.: Expressive multimodal conversational acts for SAIBA agents. In: Vilhjálmsson, H.H., Kopp, S., Marsella, S., Thórisson, K.R. (eds.) IVA 2011. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 6895, pp. 316–323. Springer, Heidelberg (2011). doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-23974-8_34 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Scherer, K.R.: Appraisal considered as a process of multilevel sequential checking. In: Scherer, K.R., Schorr, A., Johnstone, T. (eds.) Appraisal Processes in Emotion: Theory, Methods, Research, pp. 92–120. Oxford University Press, New York (2001)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Searle, J., Vanderveken, D.: Foundations of Illocutionary Logic. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1985)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Sun, R.: Duality of the Mind: A Bottom-up Approach Toward Cognition. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah (2002)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Thórisson, K., Helgasson, H.: Cognitive architectures and autonomy: a comparative review. J. Artif. Gen. Intell. 3(2), 1–30 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Traum, D.R., Allen, J.F.: Discourse obligations in dialogue processing. In: Proceedings of the 32th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL), pp. 1–8 (1994)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Walton, D., Krabbe, E.: Commitment in Dialogue: Basic Concept of Interpersonal Reasoning. State University of New York Press, Albany (1995)Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Wooldridge, M.: An Introduction to MultiAgent Systems. Wiley, New York (2009)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Carole Adam
    • 1
  • Wafa Johal
    • 1
  • Damien Pellier
    • 1
  • Humbert Fiorino
    • 1
  • Sylvie Pesty
    • 1
  1. 1.Univ. Grenoble-Alps, LIGGrenobleFrance

Personalised recommendations