SOCO 2016, ICEUTE 2016, CISIS 2016: International Joint Conference SOCO’16-CISIS’16-ICEUTE’16 pp 3-12 | Cite as
Predicting 30-Day Emergency Readmission Risk
Abstract
Objective: Predicting Emergency Department (ED) readmissions is of great importance since it helps identifying patients requiring further post-discharge attention as well as reducing healthcare costs. It is becoming standard procedure to evaluate the risk of ED readmission within 30 days after discharge. Methods. Our dataset is stratified into four groups according to the Kaiser Permanente Risk Stratification Model. We deal with imbalanced data using different approaches for resampling. Feature selection is also addressed by a wrapper method which evaluates feature set importance by the performance of various classifiers trained on them. Results. We trained a model for each scenario and subpopulation, namely case management (CM), heart failure (HF), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and diabetes mellitus (DM). Using the full dataset we found that the best sensitivity is achieved by SVM using over-sampling methods (40.62 % sensitivity, 78.71 % specificity and 71.94 accuracy). Conclusions. Imbalance correction techniques allow to achieve better sensitivity performance, however the dataset has not enough positive cases, hindering the achievement of better prediction ability. The arbitrary definition of a threshold-based discretization for measurements which are inherently is an important drawback for the exploitation of the data, therefore a regression approach is considered as future work.
Keywords
Readmission risk Imbalanced datasets SVM ClassificationReferences
- 1.World Health Organization: Global health and ageing. World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland (2011)Google Scholar
- 2.Besga, A., Ayerdi, B., Alcalde, G., et al.: Risk factors for emergency department short time readmission in stratified population. BioMed Res. Int. 2015, 7 pages (2015). Article ID 685067, doi: 10.1155/2015/685067
- 3.Van Walraven, C., et al.: Derivation and validation of an index to predict early death or unplanned readmission after discharge from hospital to the community. Can. Med. Assoc. J. 182(6), 551–557 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 4.Van Walraven, C., Wong, J., Forster, A.: LACE+ index: extension of a validated index to predict early death or urgent readmission after hospital discharge using administrative data. Open Med. 6(3), 80–89 (2012)Google Scholar
- 5.Yu, S., Farooq, F., van Esbroeck, A., Fung, G., Anand, V., Krishnapuram, B.: Predicting readmission risk with institution-specific prediction models. Artif. Intell. Med. 65(2), 89–96 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 6.Ho, T.K.: Random decision forests. In: 1995 Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Document Analysis and Recognition, pp. 278–282. IEEE (1995)Google Scholar
- 7.Cortes, C., Vapnik, V.: Support-vector networks. Mach. Learn. 20(3), 273–297 (1995)MATHGoogle Scholar
- 8.Hall, M., Frank, E., Holmes, G., Pfahringer, B., Reutemann, P., Witten, I.H.: The WEKA data mining software: an update. SIGKDD Explor. 11(1), 10–18 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 9.Kansagara, D., Englander, H., Salanitro, A., Kagen, D., Theobald, C., Freeman, M., Kripalani, S.: Risk prediction models for hospital readmission: a systematic review. JAMA 306(15), 1688–1698 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 10.Health Quality Ontario - Early Identification of People At-Risk of Hospitalization. ISBN 978-1-4606-2908-6 (PDF) Queen’s Printer for Ontario (2013). Accessed 09 Mar 2016. Enlace: https://secure.cihi.ca/free_products/HARP_reportv_En.pdf
- 11.Feachem, R.G., Dixon, J., Berwick, D.M., Enthoven, A.C., Sekhri, N.K., White, K.L.: Getting more for their dollar: a comparison of the NHS with California’s Kaiser Permanente. BMJ 324(7330), 135–143 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 12.Chawla, N.V., Bowyer, K.W., Hall, L.O., Kegelmeyer, W.P.: SMOTE: synthetic minority over-sampling technique. J. Artif. Intell. Res. 16, 321–357 (2002)MATHGoogle Scholar
- 13.López, V., Fernández, A., García, S., Palade, V., Herrera, F.: An insight into classification with imbalanced data: Empirical results and current trends on using data intrinsic characteristics. Inf. Sci. 250, 113–141 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 14.Carpenter, C.R., Heard, K., Wilber, S., Ginde, A.A., Stiffler, K., Gerson, L.W., et al.: Research priorities for high-quality geriatric emergency care: medication management, screening, and prevention and functional assessment. Acad. Emerg. Med. 18(6), 644–654 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 15.Lopez-Aguila, S., Contel, J.C., Farre, J., Campuzano, J.L., Rajmil, L.: Predictive model for emergency hospital admission and 6-month readmission. Am. J. Manage. Care 17(9), e348–e357 (2011)Google Scholar
- 16.Han, J.H., Zimmerman, E.E., Cutler, N., Schnelle, J., Morandi, A., Dittus, R.S., et al.: Delirium in older emergency department patients: recognition, risk factors, and psychomotor subtypes. Acad. Emerg. Med. 16(3), 193–200 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 17.New guidelines for geriatric EDs: guidance focused on boosting environment, care processes. ED Manage 26(5), 49–53 (2014)Google Scholar
- 18.Phuong, T.M., Lin, Z., Altman, R.B.: Choosing SNPs using feature selection. In: 2005 IEEE Computational Systems Bioinformatics Conference (CSB 2005), pp. 301–309. IEEE (2005)Google Scholar
- 19.Hall, M.A.: Correlation-based feature selection for machine learning (Doctoral dissertation, The University of Waikato) (1999)Google Scholar
- 20.Chawla, N.V., Bowyer, K.W., Hall, L.O., Kegelmeyer, W.P.: SMOTE: synthetic minority over-sampling technique. J. Artif. Intell. Res. 16, 321–357 (2002)MATHGoogle Scholar