Advertisement

Civic CrowdFunding: Sharing Economy Financial Opportunityto Smart Cities

  • Angelo MigliettaEmail author
  • Emanuele Parisi
Chapter
  • 1.4k Downloads
Part of the Springer Tracts in Civil Engineering book series (SPRTRCIENG)

Abstract

This research aims at reckoning the advantages and criticalities concerning Civic CrowdFunding practical employment along with an evaluation of its actual implementation worldwide. Throughout a theoretical conceptualization of this phenomenon dynamics, we aim at analyzing roles and opportunities of Crowdfunding as a financial tool that helps to reduce local government budget deficits while also appeasing taxpayer’s expectations—in a positive cycle that involves basics of sharing economy for the pursuit of Smart Cities. To do so, this research will illustrate classical managerial and entrepreneurial theories that explain the CrowdFunding phenomenon, along with the opportunities and caveats that it entails, in particular the cultural and financial constraints that Civic CrowdFunding implementation might lead to. Indeed, CrowdFunding offers a wider base of potential equity investors, embracing non-professional individuals to invest in ventures that would not be possible otherwise—creating new financial offers and demands. The enlargement of financial possibilities offered by CrowdFunding partially compensates the augmented risk sensitivity from traditional credit institutions and professional investors with reference to equity capital investments—but it also entails new financial risks that shall be attentively evaluated.

Keywords

Local Government Budget Deficit Smart City Credit Spread Public Budget 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    Karanikolos, M., et al. (2013). Financial crisis, austerity, and health in Europe. The Lancet, 381(9874), 1323–1331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Van der Kwaak, C., Van Wijnbergen S. (2013). Duisenberg school of finance—Tinbergen Institute Discussion Paper, TI 13-052/VI/DSFGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Rogers, D. (2013). Government does not drive growth. Quangos do not drive growth. I do, Journal Construction Research and Innovation (Vol. 4, No 1, pp. 22–25). Publisher Chartered Institute of Building, Category Regional growth. ISSN 2045-0249 (Print)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Osborne, S. P., Radnor, Z., & Nasi, G. (2013). A new theory for public service management? Toward a (public) service-dominant approach. The American Review of Public Administration, 43(2), 135–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Sun, J., Supangkat, H., & Balasubramanian, S. (2016). Peer-to-peer sharing of private goods: Sellers’ response and consumers’ benefits. The Journal of the Association for Consumer Research, 1(2), 000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Matofska, B. (2014). What is the sharing economy? The people who share. http://www.thepeoplewhoshare.com/blog/what-is-the-sharingeconomy/
  7. 7.
    Belleflamme, P., Lambertz, T., & Schwienbacher, A. (2012). CrowdFunding: Tapping the right crowd: CORE discussion paper No. 2011/32 April 25.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ordanini, A., et al. (2011). Crowd-funding: Transforming customers into investors through innovative service platforms. Journal of Service Management, 22(4), 443–470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Choi, J., & D. Bell. (2010). Preference minorities and the internet, 2010, Working paper, WhartonGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Agrawal, A., Catalini, C., Goldfarb, A. (2011). Friends, family, and the flat world: The geography of CrowdFunding, University of Toronto. 3 August 2011Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Easterling, D. (2000). Using outcome evaluation to guide Grantmaking: Theory. Reality, and Possibilities, Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 29, 482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Alverez-Antolinez, C., et al. (2007). Leadership, structures and accountability in the public service: Priorities for the next phase of reform. New Delhi: Institute of Public Administration.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kooiman, J. (1993). Modern governance: New government-society interactions, Boulevard of Broken dreams—Why public efforts to boost entrepreneurship and capital have failed, and what to do about it, p 32.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Wyse, R. (2010). What the public sector should know about venture capital. Oxford: Handbook of best practices.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Peters, A. (2013). Will the future of urban planning be crowd funded?, 22 May 2013. Economic Development.orgGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Sakamoto, N., Liu, A. (2013). Achieving sustainable society through micro-level CrowdFunding. In ACM SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems—extended abstracts on human factors in computing systems (pp 1443–1448). New York: ACMGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Campbell, T. (2013). Beyond smart cities: How cities network, learn and innovate. Abingdon-on-Thames: Routledge.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Chasan, E. (2012) Crowd-funding industry braces for regulation. The Wall Street Journal. 5 April 2011. http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052702303302504577326200304117034.html
  19. 19.
    Hemerijck, A. (2014). Changing welfare states and the euro crisis. The Eurozone crisis and the future of Europe (pp. 213–238). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    OECD. (2004). Promise and problems of E-democracy challenges of online citizen engagement: Challenges of online citizen engagement. OECD PublicationsGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Maguire, A. (2012). Crowdfund It!, Editia.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Lerner, J. (2012). Boulevard of broken dreams: Why public efforts to boost entrepreneurship and venture capital have failed–and what to do about it. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    De Sousa, S.B (1998). Participatory budgeting in Porto Alegre: toward a redistributive democracy, politics and society (Vol 26, No 4, pp 461–510). Sage publications.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Toth, A. G. (1992). The principle of subsidiarity in the Maastricht treaty, common market law review 29. The Netherlands: Kluwer Academy Publishers.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Bellone. C. J. & Goerl G. F. (1992). Reconciling public entrepreneurship and democracy, public administration review (Vol. 52, No. 2, pp. 130–134). Wiley, LondonGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.IULM University on MilanMilanItaly

Personalised recommendations