Shared Administration for Smart Cities

Chapter
First Online:
Part of the Springer Tracts in Civil Engineering book series (SPRTRCIENG)

Abstract

Within the paradigm of Smart Cities, the role played by urban communities is becoming ever more crucial. This chapter, in particular, explores the paradigm of “Shared administration” as the most effective urban governance model that helps urban communities to operate as smart communities taking care and regenerating common urban spaces. According to this administrative culture, the “Regulation for collaboration between citizens and administration” and the “Pact” are measures to implement practical opportunities to empower citizens, to free their energies and to enhance their knowledge and competences in a renewed alliance with the public institutions.

Keywords

Technological Innovation Urban Community Smart City Italian Constitution Sustainable City 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. 1.
    Ciaffi, D. (2014). Politici? No, amministratori di fatto. Rome: Labsus.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    De Nadai, M., Staiano, J., Larcher, R., Sebe, N., Quercia, D., & Lepri, B. (2016). The death and life of great Italian cities: A mobile phone data perspective. In Proceedings of the 26th International ACM Conference on World Wide Web.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Lindblom, C. (1965). The intelligence of democracy: Decision making through mutual adjustment. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Arena, G. (1997). Introduzione all’amministrazione condivisa. Studi parlamentari e di politica costituzionale, 117/118, 29–65.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Saporito, E. (2016). Consensus building versus irreconcilable conflicts. Reframing participatory spatial planning. Milan: Polimi Springer Briefs (in printing).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Arena, G. (2014). Un regolamento per la cura condivisa dei beni comuni. Rome: Labsus.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ciaffi, D. (2015). La smart city nel nuovo paradigma collaborativo: input dal “Regolamento” di Bologna. In I. Beretta (Eds.), L’umanesimo della smart city. Inclusione, innovazione, formazione. Lecce: Pensamultimedia.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gallent, N., & Ciaffi, D. (2014). Community action and planning. Contexts, drivers, outputs. Bristol: Policy press.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    TAM associati (Ed.). (2016). Taking care. Designing for the common good. Padiglione Italia. Biennale Architettura 2016, Becco Giallo, Padova.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ciaffi, D., & Saporito, E. (2016). Thinking the common good. In TAM associati (Ed.). Taking care. Designing for the common good. Padiglione Italia. Biennale Architettura 2016, Becco Giallo, Padova.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hamari, J., Sjöklint, M., Ukkonen, A. (2015). The sharing economy: Why people participate in collaborative consumption. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Santangelo, M., Aru, S., & Pollio, A. (Eds.). (2013). Smart city. Ibridazioni, innovazioni e inerzie nelle città contemporanee. Roma: Carocci.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ciaffi, D., & Mela, A. (2011). Urbanistica partecipata. Modelli ed esperienze. Roma: Carocci.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Dipartimento di Scienze Politiche e delle relazioni internazionaliUniversità di PalermoPalermoItaly
  2. 2.Dist – Dipartimento Interateneo di Scienze, Progetto e Politiche del TerritorioPolitecnico di TorinoTurinItaly

Personalised recommendations