Advertisement

A NIME Reader pp 391-404 | Cite as

2012: The Fingerphone: A Case Study of Sustainable Instrument Redesign

  • Adrian Freed
Chapter
Part of the Current Research in Systematic Musicology book series (CRSM, volume 3)

Abstract

The Fingerphone, a reworking of the Stylophone in conductive paper, is presented as an example of new design approaches for sustainability and playability of electronic musical instruments.

Keywords

Carbon Footprint Musical Instrument Electronic Musical Instrument Musical Skill Sound Transducer 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgements

Thanks for support from Pixar/Disney, Meyer Sound Labs, Nathalie Dumont from the Concordia University School of Fine Arts and the Canada Grand project.

References

  1. Anonymous (1948). Electronic pencil enables composers to hear score. Science News Letter, (p. 3).Google Scholar
  2. Blaine, T., & Fels, S. (2003a). Collaborative musical experiences for novices. Journal of New Music Research, 32, 411–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Boie, B., Mathews, M., & Schloss, A. (1989a). The radio drum as a synthesizer controller. Proceedings of the International Computer Music Conference (pp. 42–45), San Francisco, California.Google Scholar
  4. Capps, S. (2011). Toy musical instrument design. Menlo Park: Personal Communication.Google Scholar
  5. Jensenius, A., & Voldsund, A. (2012). The music ball project: Concept, design, development, performance. In Proceedings of the International Conference on New Interfaces for Musical Expression (pp. 300–303), Ann Arbor, MI.Google Scholar
  6. Jensenius, A., Koehly, R., & Wanderley, M. M. (2005). Building low-cost music controllers. In R. Kronland-Martinet, T. Voinier, & S. Ystad (Eds.), CMMR 2005 (pp. 123–129). Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  7. Koehly, R. (2011). Fabrication of sustainable resistive-based paper touch sensors: Application to music technology. Ph.D. thesis, IDMIL, McGill University.Google Scholar
  8. Koehly, R., Curtil, D., & Wanderley, M. (2006). Paper FSRs and latex/fabric traction sensors: Methods for the development of home-made touch sensors. Proceedings of the International Conference on New Interfaces for Musical Expression (pp. 230–233), Paris, France.Google Scholar
  9. Koehly, R., Wanderley, M. M., van de Ven, T., & Curtil, D. (2014). In-house development of paper force sensors for musical applications. Computer Music Journal, 38, 22–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Lee, S., Buxton, W., & Smith, K. (1985). A multi-touch three dimensional touch-sensitive tablet. In ACM SIGCHI Bulletin, 16, 21–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Maines, R. (1989). Socially camouflaged technologies: The case of the electromechanical vibrator. Technology and Society Magazine, IEEE, 8, 3–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Parker, J. (2015). Sonification as art: Developing praxis for the audification of compost. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Auditory Display, (pp. 157–164).Google Scholar
  13. Roads, C. (1996b). Early electronic music instruments: Timeline 1899–1950. Computer Music Journal, 20, 20–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Rowland, J. (2013). Flexible audio speakers for composition and art practice. Leonardo Music Journal, 23, 33–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Simondon, G. (1958). Du mode d’existence des objets techniques. Paris: Aubier-Montaigne.Google Scholar
  16. Tresch, J., & Dolan, E. I. (2013). Toward a new organology: Instruments of music and science. Osiris, 28(1), 278–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Turing, A. (1951). Manual for the Ferranti Mk.I. University of Manchester.Google Scholar
  18. Wessel, D., & Wright, M. (2002). Problems and prospects for intimate musical control of computers. Computer Music Journal, 26(3), 11–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Yoo, J., Yan, L., Lee, S., Kim, H., & Yoo, H. J. (2009). A wearable ECG acquisition system with compact planar-fashionable circuit board-based shirt. IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine, 13, 897–902.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Center for New Music and Audio Technologies (CNMAT), University of California, BerkeleyBerkeleyUSA

Personalised recommendations