Advertisement

Fuzzy Multi-label Classification of Customer Complaint Logs Under Noisy Environment

  • Tirthankar DasguptaEmail author
  • Lipika Dey
  • Ishan Verma
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 9920)

Abstract

Analyzing and understanding customer complaints has become and important issue in almost all enterprises. With respect to this, one of the key factors involve is to automatically identify and analyze the different causes of the complaints. A single complaint may belong to multiple complaint domains with fuzzy associations to each of the different domains. Thus, single label or multi-class classification techniques may not be suitable for classification of such complaint logs. In this paper, we have analyzed and classified customer complaints of some of the leading telecom service providers in India. Accordingly, we have adopted a fuzzy multi-label text classification approach along with different language independent statistical features to address the above mentioned issue. Our evaluation shows combining the features of point-wise mutual information and unigram returns the best possible result.

References

  1. 1.
    Agarwal, S., Godbole, S., Punjani, D., Roy, S.: How much noise is too much: a study in automatic text classification. In: Seventh IEEE International Conference on Data Mining, ICDM, pp. 3–12. IEEE (2007)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Davidow, M.: Organizational responses to customer complaints: what works and what doesnt. J. Serv. Res. 5(3), 225–250 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Duan, W., Gu, B., Whinston, A.B.: Do online reviews matter? an empirical investigation of panel data. Decis. Support Syst. 45(4), 1007–1016 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Galitsky, B.: Reasoning about attitudes of complaining customers. Knowl.-Based Syst. 19(7), 592–615 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Galitsky, B.A., González, M.P., Chesñevar, C.I.: A novel approach for classifying customer complaints through graphs similarities in argumentative dialogues. Decis. Support Syst. 46(3), 717–729 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Jiang, X., Tan, A.-H.: Mining ontological knowledge from domain-specific text documents. In: Fifth IEEE International Conference on Data Mining, p. 4. IEEE (2005)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kuo, H.-K.J., Lee, C.-H.: Discriminative training of natural language call routers. IEEE Trans. Speech Audio Process. 11(1), 24–35 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Mishne, G., Carmel, D., Hoory, R., Roytman, A., Soffer, A.: Automatic analysis of call-center conversations. In: Proceedings of the 14th ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, pp. 453–459. ACM (2005)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Park, Y.: Automatic call section segmentation for contact-center calls. In: Proceedings of the Sixteenth ACM Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, pp. 117–126. ACM (2007)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Qiao, X., Li, X., Chen, J.: Telecommunications service domain ontology: semantic interoperation foundation of intelligent integrated services. In: Telecommunications Networks-Current Status and Future Trends, pp. 183–210 (2012)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Roy, S., Subramaniam. L.V.: Automatic generation of domain models for call centers from noisy transcriptions. In: Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Computational Linguistics and the 44th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pp. 737–744. Association for Computational Linguistics (2006)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Subramaniam, L.V., Faruquie, T., Ikbal, S., Godbole, S., Mohania, M.K., et al.: Business intelligence from voice of customer. In: IEEE 25th International Conference on Data Engineering, ICDE 2009, pp. 1391–1402. IEEE (2009)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Subramaniam, L.V., Roy, S., Faruquie, T.A., Negi, S.: A survey of types of text noise and techniques to handle noisy text. In: Proceedings of The Third Workshop on Analytics for Noisy Unstructured Text Data, pp. 115–122. ACM (2009)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Takeuchi, H., Subramaniam, L.V., Nasukawa, T., Roy, S.: Automatic identification of important segments and expressions for mining of business-oriented conversations at contact centers. In: EMNLP-CoNLL, pp. 458–467 (2007)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Takeuchi, H., Subramaniam, L.V., Nasukawa, T., Roy, S.: Getting insights from the voices of customers: conversation mining at a contact center. Inf. Sci. 179(11), 1584–1591 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Tang, M., Pellom, B., Hacioglu, K.: Call-type classification and unsupervised training for the call center domain. In: IEEE Workshop on Automatic Speech Recognition and Understanding, ASRU 2003, pp. 204–208. IEEE (2003)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Tsoumakas, G., Katakis, I.: Multi-label classification: an overview. Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Department of Informatics, Greece (2006)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Yu, J., Zha, Z.-J., Wang, M., Wang, K., Chua, T.-S.: Domain-assisted product aspect hierarchy generation: towards hierarchical organization of unstructured consumer reviews. In: Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pp. 140–150. Association for Computational Linguistics (2011)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Yuksel, A., Kilinc, U., Yuksel, F.: Cross-national analysis of hotel customers attitudes toward complaining and their complaining behaviours. Tour. Manag. 27(1), 11–24 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Innovation LabsTata Consultancy ServicesNew DelhiIndia

Personalised recommendations