Advertisement

Signal to Noise Ratio in Intrauterine Environment During Acoustic Stimulation

Conference paper
  • 929 Downloads
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 526)

Abstract

Acoustic stimulation in prenatal period is the issue that interest growing group of people. In this paper the ratio of maternal internal sounds (noise) and attenuated sounds from external environment (signal) is considered. There is indicated that only narrow range of frequencies is not drowned by internal sounds. The problem of a distance of sound source was also considered. It was noticed that the application of sound source on maternal abdomen does not increase the sound level in the uterus.

Keywords

Signal to noise ratio Sound attenuation Music therapy 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The work has been partially financed by Polish Ministry of Science and Silesian University of Technology statutory financial support for young researchers BKM–508/RAu–3/2016.

References

  1. 1.
    Garven, S.N.: Sound and the developing infant in the NICU: conclusions and recommendations for care. J. Perinatol. 20, 88–93 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    López-Teijón, M., García-Faura, A., Prats-Galino, A.: Fetal facial expression in response to intravaginal music emission. Ultrasound 23, 216–223 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bartel, H.: Embriologia. PZWL, Warszawa (2012)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ostrowski, K.: Embriologia człowieka. PZWL, Warszawa (1985)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    McMahon, E., Wintermark, P., Lahav, A.: Auditory brain development in premature infants: the importance of early experience. Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 1252, 17–24 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Abrams, R.M., Griffiths, S.K., Huang, X., Sain, J., Langford, G., Gerhardt, K.J.: Fetal music perception: the role of sound transmission. Music Percept. 15(3), 307–317 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gerhardt, K.J., Abrams, R.M., Oliver, C.C.: The sound environment of the fetal sheep. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 162(1), 282–287 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bienkowska, M., Mitas, A., Lipowicz, A.: Model of attenuation of sound stimuli in prenatal music therapy. In: Information Technologies in Medicine Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol. 471, pp. 421–432 (2016)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Gerhardt, K.J., Abrams, R.M.: Fetal hearing: characterization of the stimulus and response. Semin. Perinatol. 20(1), 11–20 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gerhardt, K.J., Abrams, R.M.: Fetal exposures to sound and vibroacoustic stimulation. J. Perinatol. 20, 21–30 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Abrams, R.M., Gerhardt, K.J.: The acoustic environment and physiological responses of the fetus. J. Perinatol. 20, 31–36 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Abrams, R.M., Gerhardt, K.J., Griffiths, S.K., Huang, X., Antonelli, P.J.: Intrauterine sounds in sheep. J. Sound Vib. 216(3), 539–542 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Bistafa, S.R., Bradley, J.S.: Reverberation time and maximum background-noise level for classrooms from a comparative study of speech intelligibility metrics. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 107(2), 861–875 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Bistafa, S.R., Bradley, J.S.: Optimum acoustical conditions for speech in classrooms. Vib. Worldw. 31(9), 12–17 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Automatic Control, Electronics and Computer ScienceSilesian University of TechnologyGliwicePoland
  2. 2.Department of Informatics and Medical Equipment, Faculty of Biomedical EngineeringSilesian University of TechnologyGliwicePoland
  3. 3.Institute of AnthropologyWrocław University of Environmental and Life SciencesWrocławPoland

Personalised recommendations