Advertisement

Work Practice in Situation Rooms – An Ethnographic Study of Emergency Response Work in Governmental Organizations

  • Jonas LandgrenEmail author
  • Fredrik BergstrandEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing book series (LNBIP, volume 265)

Abstract

This paper presents ethnographic accounts from multiple studies on situation room work in governmental organizations. The purpose of this paper is to make visible aspects of the work practice and provide triggers for future discussions regarding how such work practices could be supported with improved information technology. The findings show the collaborative nature of situation room work and how a variety of information technologies are embedded and intertwined in the practice. Assembling, monitoring, exploring, converging, and consolidating are key activities in a general work pattern in situation rooms.

Keywords

Situation rooms Coordination Collaboration Work-practice Ethnography Crisis response 

References

  1. 1.
    Wybo, J.L., Kowalski, K.M.: Command centers and emergency management support. Saf. Sci. 30, 131–138 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Quarantelli, E.L.: Uses and Preblems of Local EOCs in Disasters (1978)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kendra, J.M., Wachtendorf, T.: Elements of resilience after the world trade center disaster: reconstituting New York city’s emergency operations centre. Disasters 27, 37–53 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Lutz, L.D., Lindell, M.K.: Incident command system as a response model within emergency operation centers during Hurricane Rita. J. Contingencies Crisis Manag. 16, 122–134 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Scanlon, T.J.: The role of EOCs in emergency management: a comparison of Canadian and American experience. Int. J. Mass Emerg. Disasters 12, 51–75 (1994)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bohn, M.K.: Nerve Center: Inside the White House Situation Room. Potomac Books Inc., Washington, DC (2003)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Johansson, R., Danielsson, E., Borglund, E.: Forskningsöversikt stabsarbete. Myndigheten för samhällsskydd och beredskap, Karlstad (2011)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lee, C.P., Paine, D.: From the matrix to a model of coordinated action (MoCA): a conceptual framework of and for CSCW. In: Proceeding CSCW, pp. 179–194. ACM (2015)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    McEntire, D.A.: Local emergency management organizations. In: McEntire, D.A. (ed.) Handbook of Disaster Research, pp. 168–182. Springer, New York (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Weick, K.E.: Ambiguity as grasp: the reworking of sense. J. Contingencies Crisis Manag. 23, 117–123 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Heath, C., Luff, P.: Collaboration and control - crisis management and multimedia technology in London underground line control rooms. Comput. Support. Coop. Work 1, 69–94 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Suchman, L.: Centers of coordination: a case and some themes. In: Resnick, L.B., Säljö, R., Pontecorvo, C., Burge, B. (eds.) Discourse, Tools and Reasoning, pp. 41–62. Springer, Heidelberg (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    NASA, M.S.C.: Mercury project summary, including results of the fourth manned orbital flight. NASA SP-45 (1963)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Perry, R.W.: The structure and function of community emergency operations centres. Disaster Prev. Manag. 4, 37–41 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ley, B., Pipek, V., Reuter, C., Wiedenhoefer, T.: Supporting improvisation work in inter-organizational crisis management. In: Proceedings CHI, pp. 1529–1538. ACM (2012)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Stanton, N., Baber, C., Harris, D.: Modelling Command and Control: Event Analysis of Systemic Teamwork. Ashgate Publishing Ltd., Aldershot (2008)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Dynes, R.: Community emergency planning: false assumptions and inappropriate analogies. Int. J. Mass Emerg. Disasters 12, 141–158 (1994)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Bergstrand, F., Landgren, J.: Visual reporting in time-critical work: exploring video use in emergency response. In: Proceedings of MobileHCI, pp. 415–424. ACM (2011) 2037436Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Berndtsson, J., Normark, M.: The coordinative functions of flight strips: air traffic control work revisited. In: Proceedings GROUP, pp. 101–110. ACM (1999) 320308Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Khalilbeigi, M., Bradler, D., Schweizer, I., Probst, F., Steimle, J.: Towards computer support of paper workflows in emergency management. In: Proceedings ISCRAM (2010)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kunz, A., Alavi, A., Landgren, J., Yantaç, A.E., Woźniak, P., Sárosi, Z., Fjeld, M.: Tangible tabletops for emergency response: an exploratory study. In: Proceedings MIDI, pp. 10. ACM (2013)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Crabtree, A., Rouncefield, M., Tolmie, P.: Doing Design Ethnography. Springer, London (2012)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Hammersley, M., Atkinson, P.: Ethnography: Principles in Practice. Routledge, New York (2007)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Van Maanen, J.: Tales of the Field: On Writing Ethnography. University of Chicago Press, Chicago (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Pink, S., Morgan, J.: Short-term ethnography: intense routes to knowing. Symb. Interact. 36, 351–361 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Chalmers University of TechnologyGothenburgSweden
  2. 2.University of GothenburgGothenburgSweden

Personalised recommendations