Advertisement

A Case for Understanding End-to-End Performance of Topic Detection and Tracking Based Big Data Applications in the Cloud

  • Meisong Wang
  • Rajiv RanjanEmail author
  • Prem Prakash Jayaraman
  • Peter Strazdins
  • Pete Burnap
  • Omer Rana
  • Dimitrios Georgakopulos
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes of the Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering book series (LNICST, volume 169)

Abstract

Big Data is revolutionizing nearly every aspect of our lives ranging from enterprises to consumers, from science to government. On the other hand, cloud computing recently has emerged as the platform that can provide an effective and economical infrastructure for collection and analysis of big data produced by applications such as topic detection and tracking (TDT). The fundamental challenge is how to cost-effectively orchestrate these big data applications such as TDT over existing cloud computing platforms for accomplishing big data analytic tasks while meeting performance Service Level Agreements (SLAs). In this paper a layered performance model for TDT big data analytic applications that take into account big data characteristics, the data and event flow across myriad cloud software and hardware resources. We present some preliminary results of the proposed systems that show its effectiveness as regards to understanding the complex performance dependencies across multiple layers of TDT applications.

Keywords

Cloud computing Big data Hadoop map reduce 

References

  1. 1.
    Lara Yejas, O.D., Zhuang, W., Pannu, A.: Big R: large-scale analytics on hadoop using R. In: IEEE International Congress on Big Data (BigData Congress), 27 June-2 July, pp. 570–577 (2014)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Yang, X., Sun, J.: An analytical performance model of MapReduce. In: IEEE International Conference on Cloud Computing and Intelligence Systems (CCIS), 15–17 September, pp. 306–310 (2011)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Costa, F., Silva, L., Dahlin, M.: Volunteer cloud computing: MapReduce over the Internet. In: 2011 IEEE International Symposium on Parallel and Distributed Processing Workshops and Phd Forum (IPDPSW), 16–20 May, pp. 1855–1862 (2011)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Lin, X., Meng, Z., Xu, C., Wang, M.: A practical performance model for Hadoop MapReduce. In: IEEE International Conference on Cluster Computing Workshops (CLUSTER WORKSHOPS), pp. 231–239 (2012)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Verma, A., Cherkasova, L., Campbell, R.H.: ARIA: automatic resource inference and allocation for mapreduce environments. In: Proceedings of the 8th ACM International Conference on Autonomic Computing (ICAC 2011), pp. 235–244. ACM, New York (2011)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Nykiel, T., Potamias, M., Mishra, C., Kollios, G., Koudas, N.: MRShare: sharing across multiple queries in MapReduce. Proc. VLDB Endow. 3(1–2), 494–505 (2010)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Cui, X., Lin, X., Hu, C., Zhang, R., Wang, C.: Modeling the Performance of MapReduce under resource contentions and task failures. In: 2013 IEEE 5th International Conference on Cloud Computing Technology and Science (CloudCom), 2–5 December 2013, vol. 1, pp. 158–163 (2013)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Xu, L.: MapReduce framework optimization via performance modeling. In: 2012 IEEE 26th International Parallel and Distributed Processing Symposium Workshops & PhD Forum (IPDPSW), 21–25 May, pp. 2506–2509 (2012)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Herodotou, H.: Hadoop performance models. Technical report, CS-2011-05, Computer Science Department, Duke UniversityGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Khan, M., Jin, Y., Li, M., Xiang, Y., Jiang, C.: Hadoop performance modeling for job estimation and resource provisioning. IEEE Trans. Parallel Distrib. Syst. 27, 441 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Tamano, H., Nakadai, S., Araki, T.: Optimizing multiple machine learning jobs on MapReduce. In: IEEE Third International Conference on Cloud Computing Technology and Science (CloudCom), 29 November–1 December, pp. 59–66 (2011)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Han, J., Ishii, M., Makino, H.: A Hadoop performance model for multi-rack clusters. In: 2013 5th International Conference on Computer Science and Information Technology (CSIT), 27–28 March, pp. 265–274 (2013)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Alhamazani, K., Ranjan, R., Mitra, K., Jayaraman, P.P., Huang, Z., Wang, L., Rabhi, F.: CLAMS: cross-layer multi-cloud application monitoring-as-a-service framework. In: IEEE International Conference on Services Computing (SCC), 27 June–2 July, pp. 283–290 (2014)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Liu, B., Blasch, E., Chen, Y., Shen, D., Chen, G.: Scalable sentiment classification for big data analysis using Nave Bayes classifier. In: 2013 IEEE International Conference on Big Data, 6–9 October, pp. 99–104 (2013)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Amayri, O., Bouguila, N.: Online news topic detection and tracking via localized feature selection. In: The 2013 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN), 4–9 August, pp. 1–8 (2013)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Huang, J., Zhao, H., Zhang, J.: Detecting flu transmission by social sensor in China. In: 2013 IEEE and Internet of Things (iThings/CPSCom), IEEE International Conference on Green Computing and Communications (GreenCom), and IEEE Cyber, Physical and Social Computing, 20–23 August, pp. 1242–1247 (2013)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Wu, Z., Liao, J., Zhang, L.: Predicting on retweeting of hot topic tweets in microblog. In: 2013 5th IEEE International Conference on Broadband Network & Multimedia Technology (IC-BNMT), 17–19 November, pp. 119–123 (2013)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Berliska, J., Drozdowski, M.: Scheduling divisible MapReduce computations. J. Parallel Distrib. Comput. 71(3), 450–459 (2011). doi: 10.1016/j.jpdc.2010.12.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Fischer, M.J., Su, X., Yin, Y.: Assigning tasks for efficiency in Hadoop: extended abstract. In: Proceedings of the Twenty-Second Annual ACM Symposium on Parallelism in Algorithms and Architectures (SPAA 2010), pp. 30–39. ACM, New York (2010)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Zhang, M., Ranjan, R., Nepal, S., Menzel, M., Haller, A.: A declarative recommender system for cloud infrastructure services selection. In: Vanmechelen, K., Altmann, J., Rana, O.F. (eds.) GECON 2012. LNCS, vol. 7714, pp. 102–113. Springer, Heidelberg (2012). doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-35194-5_8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© ICST Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Meisong Wang
    • 1
  • Rajiv Ranjan
    • 2
    • 5
    Email author
  • Prem Prakash Jayaraman
    • 3
  • Peter Strazdins
    • 1
  • Pete Burnap
    • 4
  • Omer Rana
    • 4
  • Dimitrios Georgakopulos
    • 3
  1. 1.Australian National UniversityCanberraAustralia
  2. 2.Newcastle UniversityNewcastle Upon TyneUK
  3. 3.RMIT UniversityMelbourneAustralia
  4. 4.Cardiff UniversityCardiffUK
  5. 5.CSIROCanberraAustralia

Personalised recommendations