Assessing the Welfare of Pinnipeds

Chapter
First Online:
Part of the Animal Welfare book series (AWNS, volume 17)

Abstract

A recent increase in collaborative and independent studies on sea lions, seals and walruses has advanced our knowledge and interest in pinniped welfare. Nevertheless published discussions of the welfare of pinnipeds, and secondly of potential measures to assess their welfare, are, respectively, very few and non-existent. This chapter aims to make first steps in the discussion on assessing pinniped welfare, with the goal of stimulating future welfare investigations. Pinniped species are able to thrive in two opposing environments, the land/ice margin at the coast and in the sea, and these animals use these two ‘domains’ for different functions. Welfare measurement is concerned with the outcome of an animal’s internal and external responses to its environment, and pinniped species’ evolutionary biology may be especially important in this respect, in terms of our understanding of the animals’ responses and interactions within their two domains. Pinnipeds are being directly impacted by serious anthropogenic disturbances in the wild, including human interference at established feeding and breeding grounds, hunting, entanglement and climate change, and are also often kept in captive collections. Feasible evaluations of welfare can therefore be assumed to have potential widespread utility, including applications benefitting the animals themselves.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Abbott DH, Keverne EB, Bercovitch FB, Shively CA, Mendoza SP, Saltzman W, Snowdon CT, Ziegler TE, Banjevic M, Garland T, Sapolsky RM (2003) Are subordinates always stressed? A comparative analysis of rank differences in cortisol levels among primates. Horm Behav 43:67–82PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Atkinson S, Crocker D, Houser D, Mashburn K (2015) Stress physiology in marine mammals: how well do they fit the terrestrial model? J Comp Physiol B 185(5):463–486PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. AWA (1966) Animal welfare act. Public law 89–544. 89th congress, H. R. 13881, august 24, 1966. USDA, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  4. Baldi R, Campagna C, Pedraza S, Le Boeuf BJ (1996) Social effects of space availability on the breeding behaviour of elephant seals in Patagonia. Anim Behav 51:717–724CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Barber JC (2009) Programmatic approaches to assessing and improving animal welfare in zoos and aquariums. Zoo Biol 28:519–530PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Bartholomew GA (1970) A model for the evolution of pinniped polygyny. Evolution 24:546–559PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bishop AM, Pomeroy P, Twiss SD (2015) Variability in individual rates of aggression in wild gray seals: fine-scale analysis reveals importance of social and spatial stability. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 69:1663–1675CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Boissy A, Manteuffel G, Jensen MB, Moe RO, Spruijt B, Keeling LJ, Winckler C, Forkman B, Dimitrov I, Langbein J, Bakken M (2007) Assessment of positive emotions in animals to improve their welfare. Physiol Behav 92:375–397PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bossart GD (2011) Marine mammals as sentinel species for oceans and human health. Vet Pathol 48:676-690Google Scholar
  10. Boyd IL (1991) Environmental and physiological factors controlling the reproductive cycles of pinnipeds. Can J Zool 69:1135–1148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Böye M, Güntürkün O, Vauclair J (2005) Right ear advantage for conspecific calls in adults and subadults, but not infants, California Sea lions (Zalophus californianus): hemispheric specialization for communication? Eur J Neurosci 21:1727–1732PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Brando SICA (2010) Advances in husbandry training in marine mammal care programs. Int J Comp Psychol 23:777–791Google Scholar
  13. Brilot BO, Normandale CL, Parkin A, Bateson M (2009) Can we use starlings’ aversion to eyespots as the basis for a novel ‘cognitive bias’ task? Appl Anim Behav Sci 118:182–190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Broom DM (1983) Stereotypies as animal welfare indicators. In: Smidt D (ed) Indicators relevant to farm animal welfare. Springer, Netherlands, pp 81–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Broom DM (1991) Assessing welfare and suffering. Behav Process 25:117–123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Butterworth A, Clegg I, Bass C (2012) Untangled–marine debris: a global picture of the impact on animal welfare and of animal-focused solutions. World Society for the Protection of Animals International, London, UKGoogle Scholar
  17. Butterworth A, Richardson M (2013) A review of animal welfare implications of the Canadian commercial seal hunt. Mar Policy 38:457–469CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Council Directive (1999) Council Directive 1999/22/EC of 29th March 1999 relating to the keeping of wild animals in zoos. Retrieved from http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex:31999L0022 on March 21st 2016
  19. Castellini MA, Davis RW, Loughlin TR, Williams TM (1993) Blood chemistries and body condition of Steller Sea lion pups at Marmot Island, Alaska. Mar Mamm Sci 9:202–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Castellote M, Fossa F (2006) Measuring acoustic activity as a method to evaluate welfare in captive beluga whales (Delphinapterus leucas). Aquat Mamm 32:325CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Chilvers BL, Robertson BC, Wilkinson IS, Duignan PJ, Gemmell NJ (2005) Male harassment of female New Zealand Sea lions, Phocarctos hookeri: mortality, injury, and harassment avoidance. Can J Zool 83:642–648CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Clark FE (2013) Marine mammal cognition and captive care: a proposal for cognitive enrichment in zoos and aquariums. J Zoo Wildl Med 1:1–6Google Scholar
  23. Clegg ILK, Borger-Turner JL, Eskelinen HC (2015) C-well: the development of a welfare assessment index for captive bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus). Anim Welf 24:267–282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Colitz CM, Saville WJ, Renner MS, McBain JF, Reidarson TH, Schmitt TL, Nolan EC, Dugan SJ, Knightly F, Rodriguez MM, Mejia-Fava JC (2010) Risk factors associated with cataracts and lens luxations in captive pinnipeds in the United States and the Bahamas. J Am Vet Med Assoc 237:429–436PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Dawkins MS (2006) A user’s guide to animal welfare science. Trends Ecol Evol 21:77–82PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. DeVries AC, Glasper ER, Detillion CE (2003) Social modulation of stress responses. Physiol Behav 79:399–407PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Désiré L, Boissy A, Veissier I (2002) Emotions in farm animals: a new approach to animal welfare in applied ethology. Behav Process 60:165–180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Dierauf L, Gulland FM (eds) (2001) CRC handbook of marine mammal medicine, 2nd edn. CRC press, Boca Raton, FLGoogle Scholar
  29. Fitzgerald PL (2011) “morality” may not be enough to justify the EU seal products ban: animal welfare meets international trade law. J Int Wildl Law Pol 14:85–136Google Scholar
  30. Fraser D, Weary DM, Pajor EA, Milligan BN (1997) A scientific conception of animal welfare that reflects ethical concerns. Anim Welf 6:187–205Google Scholar
  31. Gage LJ (2011) Captive pinniped eye problems, we can do better. J Mar Anim Ecol 4:25–28Google Scholar
  32. Gonyou HW (1994) Why the study of animal behavior is associated with the animal welfare issue. J Anim Sci 72:2171–2177PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Greig DJ, Gulland FM, Kreuder C (2005) A decade of live California Sea lion (Zalophus californianus) strandings along the Central California coast: causes and trends, 1991-2000. Aquat Mamm 31:11–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Grindrod JAE, Cleaver JA (2001) Environmental enrichment reduces the performance of stereotypic circling behavior in captive common seals (Phoca vitulina). Anim Welf 10:53–63Google Scholar
  35. Guinet C, Roux JP, Bonnet M, Mison V (1998) Effect of body size, body mass, and body condition on reproduction of female south African fur seals (Arctocephalus pusillus) in Namibia. Can J Zool 76:1418–1424CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Gulland FMD, Haulena M, Dierauf LA (2001) Seals and sea lions. In: FMD G, Dierauf LA (eds) CRC handbook of marine mammal medicine, 2nd edn. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, pp 907–926CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Held SD, Špinka M (2011) Animal play and animal welfare. Anim Behav 81:891–899CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Hocking DP, Salverson M, Evans AR (2015) Foraging-based enrichment promotes more varied behaviour in captive Australian fur feals (Arctocephalus pusillus doriferus). PLoS One 10:e0124615PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Hopster H, de Jong IC (2014) Welfare of sea lions in travelling circuses, Research report, vol 770. Wageningen UR Livestock Research, Lelystad, The Netherlands, p 92Google Scholar
  40. Insley S, Phillips AV, Charrier I (2003) A review of social recognition in pinnipeds. Aquat Mamm 29:181–201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Jensen A-L, Delfour F, Carter T (2013) Anticipatory behaviour in captive bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus) – a preliminary study. Zoo Biol 32:436–444PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Joseph B, Antrim J (2010) Special considerations for the maintenance of marine mammals in captivity. In: Kleiman DG, Thompson KV, Kirk Baer C (eds) Wild mammals in captivity: principles and techniques for zoo management, 2nd edn. Chicago, The University of Chicago Press, pp 181–216Google Scholar
  43. Kastelein RA, Wiepkema PR (1988) The significance of training for the behaviour of Steller Sea lions (Eumetopias jubata) in human care. Aquat Mamm 14:39–41Google Scholar
  44. Kastelein RA, Wiepkema PR (1989) A digging trough as occupational therapy for Pacific walruses in human care. Aquat Mamm 15:9–17Google Scholar
  45. Kastelein RA, Kershaw J, Berghout E, Wiepkema PR (1995) The food consumption of south American sea lions (Otaria flaveseem). Aquat Mamm 21:43–53Google Scholar
  46. Kershaw JL, Hall AJ (2016) Seasonal variation in harbour seal (Phoca vitulina) blubber cortisol-a novel indicator of physiological state? Sci Rep 6:21889PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Le Boeuf BJ (1974) Male-male competition and reproductive success in elephant seals. Am Zool 14:163–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Lefebvre L (2010) Taxonomic counts of cognition in the wild. Biol Lett. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2010.0556 PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  49. Leliveld LM, Langbein J, Puppe B (2013) The emergence of emotional lateralization: evidence in non-human vertebrates and implications for farm animals. Appl Anim Behav Sci 145:1–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Levermann N, Galatius A, Ehlme G, Rysgaard S, Born EW (2003) Feeding behaviour of free-ranging walruses with notes on apparent dextrality of flipper use. BMC Ecol 3:1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Malassis R, Delfour F (2015) Sea lions’ (Zalophus californianus) use of human pointing gestures as referential cues. Learn Behav 43:101–112PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Manteuffel G, Puppe B, Schön PC (2004) Vocalization of farm animals as a measure of welfare. Appl Anim Behav Sci 88:163–182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Maple TL (2007) Toward a science of welfare for animals in the zoo. J Appl Anim Welf Sci 10:63–70PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Mason GJ (2010) Species differences in responses to captivity: stress, welfare and the comparative method. Trends Ecol Evol 25:713–721PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Mason GJ, Veasey JS (2010) How should the psychological well-being of zoo elephants be objectively investigated? Zoo Biol 29:237–255PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Mellish JAE, Tuomi PA, Horning M (2004) Assessment of ultrasound imaging as a noninvasive measure of blubber thickness in pinnipeds. J Zoo Wildl Med 35:116–118PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Mellish JAE, Calkins DG, Christen DR, Horning M, Rea LD, Atkinson SK (2006) Temporary captivity as a research tool: comprehensive study of wild pinnipeds under controlled conditions. Aquat Mamm 32:58–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Mendl M, Paul ES (2004) Consciousness, emotion and animal welfare: insights from cognitive science. Anim Welf 13:17–25Google Scholar
  59. Mendl M, Burman OH, Parker RM, Paul ES (2009) Cognitive bias as an indicator of animal emotion and welfare: emerging evidence and underlying mechanisms. Appl Anim Behav Sci 118:161–181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Mendl M, Burman OH, Paul ES (2010) An integrative and functional framework for the study of animal emotion and mood. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 277:2895–2904CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Miller EH (1975) A comparative study of facial expressions of two species of pinnipeds. Behaviour 53:268–284CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Millman ST (2007) Sickness behavior, and its relevance to animal welfare assessment at the group level. Anim Welf 16:123–125Google Scholar
  63. Mononen J, Moller SH, Hansen SW, Hovland AL, Koistinen T, Lidfors L, Malkmvist J, Vinke CM, Ahola L (2012) The development of on-farm welfare assessment protocols for foxes and mink: the WelFur project. Anim Welf 21:363–371CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Myers MJ, Litz B, Atkinson S (2010) The effects of age, sex, season and geographic region on circulating serum cortisol concentrations in threatened and endangered Steller Sea lions (Eumetopias jubatus). Gen Comp Endocrinol 165:72–77PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Nolen AL, Bishop LJ (2001) Animals in research and education: ethical issues. Kennedy Inst Ethics J 11:91–112PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Paul ES, Harding EJ, Mendl M (2005) Measuring emotional processes in animals: the utility of a cognitive approach. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 29:469–491PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Petrauskas LR, Atkinson SK (2006) Variation of fecal corticosterone concentrations in captive Steller Sea lions (Eumetopias jubatus) in relation to season and behavior. Aquat Mamm 32:168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Petrauskas L, Atkinson S, Gulland F, Mellish J, Horning M (2008) Monitoring glucocorticoid response to rehabilitation and research procedures in California and Steller Sea lions. J Exp Zool 309:73–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Purser J, Radford AN (2011) Acoustic noise induces attention shifts and reduces foraging performance in three-spined sticklebacks (Gasterosteus aculeatus). PLoS One 6:e17478PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Pryaslova YP, Lyamin OI, Mukhametov LM (2009) Lateralized behavior in northern fur seals. Dokl Biol Sci 1:171–174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Renouf D, Lawson JW (1987) Quantitative aspects of harbour seal (Phoca vitulina) play. J Zool 212:267–273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Renouf D (1991) The behaviour of pinnipeds. Dordrecht, The Netherlands, Springer Science & Business MediaCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Reynolds JE, Rommel SA (eds) (1999) Biology of marine mammals. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, DC, p 578Google Scholar
  74. Riedman M (1990) The pinnipeds: seals, sea lions, and walruses. University of California Press, Berkeley, California, p 439Google Scholar
  75. Robeck TR, Atkinson AKC, Brook F (2001) Reproduction. In: FMD G, Dierauf LA (eds) CRC handbook of marine mammal medicine, 2nd edn. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, pp 193–236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Roberts SP, Demaster DP (2001) Pinniped survival in captivity: annual survival rates of six species. Mar Mamm Sci 17:381–387CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Roche JR, Friggens NC, Kay JK, Fisher MW, Stafford KJ, Berry DP (2009) Invited review: body condition score and its association with dairy cow productivity, health, and welfare. J Dairy Sci 92:5769–5801PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Rogers LJ (2010) Relevance of brain and behavioural lateralization to animal welfare. Appl Anim Behav Sci 127:1–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Roletto J (1993) Hematology and serum chemistry values for clinically healthy and sick pinnipeds. J Zoo Wildl Med 24:145–157Google Scholar
  80. Rosen DA (2009) Steller Sea lions Eumetopias jubatus and nutritional stress: evidence from captive studies. Mammal Rev 39:284–306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Rushen J, Mason G (2008) A decade-or-more’s progress in understanding stereotypic behavior. In: Mason G, Rushen J (eds) Stereotypic animal behavior: fundamentals and applications to welfare. CAB International, UK, pp 1–18Google Scholar
  82. Sapolsky RM (2005) The influence of social hierarchy on primate health. Science 308:648–652PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Schusterman RJ, Kastak D, Levenson DH, Reichmuth CJ, Southall BL (2000) Why pinnipeds don’t echolocate. J Acoust Soc Am 107:2256–2264PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Schusterman RJ, Southall BL, Kastak D, Reichmuth Kastak C (2001) Pinniped vocal communication: Form and function. In: Proceedings of the 17th International Congress on Acoustics, Rome, Italy, pp 1-2)Google Scholar
  85. Schusterman RJ, Kastak CR, Kastak D (2002) The cognitive sea lion: meaning and memory in the laboratory and in nature. The cognitive animal. Empirical and theoretical perspectives on animal cognition. The MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, pp 217–228Google Scholar
  86. Scott EM, Mann J, Watson-Capps JJ, Sargeant BL, Connor RC (2005) Aggression in bottlenose dolphins: evidence for sexual coercion, male-male competition, and female tolerance through analysis of tooth-rake marks and behaviour. Behaviour 142:21–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Small RJ, Demaster DP (1995) Survival of five species of captive marine mammals. Mar Mamm Sci 11:209–226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Smith BP, Litchfield CA (2010) An empirical case study examining effectiveness of environmental enrichment in two captive Australian sea lions (Neophoca cinerea). J Appl Anim Welf Sci 13:103–122PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Sneddon LU, Elwood RW, Adamo SA, Leach MC (2014) Defining and assessing animal pain. Anim Behav 97:201–212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Spruijt BM, van den Bos R, Pijlman FT (2001) A concept of welfare based on reward evaluating mechanisms in the brain: anticipatory behaviour as an indicator for the state of reward systems. Appl Anim Behav Sci 72:145–171PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Swaisgood RR (2007) Current status and future directions of applied behavioral research for animal welfare and conservation. Appl Anim Behav Sci 102:139–162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Thompson PM, Miller D, Cooper R, Hammond PS (1994) Changes in the distribution and activity of female harbour seals during the breeding season: implications for their lactation strategy and mating patterns. J Anim Ecol 63:24–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Trites AW, Donnelly CP (2003) The decline of Steller Sea lions Eumetopias jubatus in Alaska: a review of the nutritional stress hypothesis. Mammal Rev 33:3–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Trumble SJ, Castellini MA, Mau TL, Castellini JM (2006) Dietary and seasonal influences on blood chemistry and hematology in captive harbor seals. Mar Mamm Sci 22:104–123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Twiss SD, Anderson SS, Monaghan P (1998) Limited intra-specific variation in male grey seal (Halichoerus grypus) dominance relationships in relation to variation in male mating success and female availability. J Zool 246:259–267CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Veasey J (2006) Concepts in the care and welfare of captive elephants. International Zoo Yearbook 40:63–79Google Scholar
  97. Veissier I, Butterworth A, Bock B, Roe E (2008) European approaches to ensure good animal welfare. Appl Anim Behav Sci 113:279–297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Vicino GA, Marcacci ES (2015) Intensity of play behavior as a potential measure of welfare: a novel method for quantifying the integrated intensity of behavior in African elephants. Zoo Biol 34:492–496PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Waiblinger S, Boivin X, Pedersen V, Tosi MV, Janczak AM, Visser EK, Jones RB (2006) Assessing the human–animal relationship in farmed species: a critical review. Appl Anim Behav Sci 101:185–242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Waller BM, Micheletta J (2013) Facial expression in nonhuman animals. Emot Rev 5:54–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Walsh MT, Andrews BF, Antrim J (2001) Walruses. In: FMD G, Dierauf LA (eds) CRC handbook of marine mammal medicine, 2nd edn. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, pp 927–937CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Walsh MT, Gaynor EV (2001) Thermal imaging of marine mammals. In: FMD G, Dierauf LA (eds) CRC handbook of marine mammal medicine, 2nd edn. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, pp 643–652CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. Wartzok D (1991) Physiology of behaviour in pinnipeds. In: Renouf D (ed) The behaviour of pinnipeds. Springer Science & Business Media, Dordrecht, NE, pp 236–299CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Webster J (2005) Animal welfare: limping towards Eden. Blackwell Publishing Ltd, Oxford, UKCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. Welfare Quality® (2009a) Welfare quality® assessment protocol for cattle (fattening cattle, dairy cows, veal calves). Welfare Quality® Consortium, Lelystad, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
  106. Welfare Quality® (2009b) Welfare quality® assessment protocol for pigs. Welfare Quality® Consortium, Lelystad, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
  107. Welfare Quality® (2009c) Welfare quality® assessment protocol for poultry. Welfare Quality® Consortium, Lelystad, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
  108. Wells DL, Irwin RM, Hepper PG (2006) Lateralised swimming behaviour in the California Sea lion. Behav Process 73:121–123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  109. Whitham JC, Wielebnowski N (2013) New directions for zoo animal welfare science. Appl Anim Behav Sci 147:247–260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  110. Wierucka K, Siemianowska S, Woźniak M, Jasnosz K, Kieliszczyk M, Kozak P, Sergiel A (2016) Activity Budgets of Captive Cape Fur Seals (Arctocephalus pusillus) Under a Training Regime. Appl Anim Wel Sci 19:62–72Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Laboratoire d’Ethologie Expérimentale et ComparéeVilletaneuseFrance
  2. 2.Department of Clinical Veterinary ScienceUniversity of BristolBristolUK

Personalised recommendations