Case Study 1: Corporate Citizenship and Social Responsibility Policies in America

  • Mark Anthony Camilleri


This case study sheds light on the broad categorisation of social responsibility and environmental sustainability policies in the USA. At the same time, it outlines a non-exhaustive, disciplined research on corporate citizenship. Previous theoretical underpinnings and empirical studies have often indicated that social responsibility and environmentally sound behaviours are being embedded into core business functions and corporate strategic decisions. Notwithstanding, this research shows how major US institutional frameworks and principles have been purposely developed to foster a climate for social and environmental responsibility engagement. Policies and voluntary instruments include formal accreditation systems and soft laws that stimulate businesses and large organisations to implement and report their CSR-related activities. Several agencies of the US Government are currently employing CSR programmes that are intended to provide guidance on corporate citizenship and human rights; labour and supply chains ; anticorruption; energy and the environment; as well as health and social welfare among other issues.


  1. Albinger, H. S., & Freeman, S. J. (2000). Corporate social performance and attractiveness as an employer to different job seeking populations. Journal of Business Ethics, 28(3), 243–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. BCCC. (2015). The Corporate Citizen, Issue 14 (Fall 2015) Boston College Center for Corporate Citizenship. .Retrieved November 10, 2015, from
  3. Brammer, S., & Pavelin, S. (2005). Corporate community contributions in the United Kingdom and the United States. Journal of Business Ethics, 56(1), 15–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Camilleri, M. A. (2015a). Valuing stakeholder engagement and sustainability reporting. Corporate Reputation Review, 18(3), 210–222 Retrieved November 2, 2015, from Scholar
  5. Camilleri, M. A. (2015b). Environmental, social and governance disclosures in Europe. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 6(2), 224–242. Retrieved November 2, 2015, from Scholar
  6. Carroll, A. B. (1979). A three-dimensional conceptual model of corporate performance. Academy of Management Review, 4(4), 497–505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Carroll, A. B. (1991). The pyramid of corporate social responsibility: Toward the moral management of organizational stakeholders. Business Horizons, 34(4), 39–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Carroll, A. B. (1998). The four faces of corporate citizenship. Business and Society Review, 100(1), 1–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Carroll, A. B. (1999). Corporate social responsibility evolution of a definitional construct. Business & Society, 38(3), 268–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Carroll, A. B., & Shabana, K. M. (2010). The business case for corporate social responsibility: A review of concepts, research and practice. International Journal of Management Reviews, 12(1), 85–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chen, S., & Bouvain, P. (2009). Is corporate responsibility converging? A comparison of corporate responsibility reporting in the USA, UK, Australia, and Germany. Journal of Business Ethics, 87(1), 299–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Clarkson, M. E. (1995). A stakeholder framework for analyzing and evaluating corporate social performance. Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 92–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Doh, J. P., & Guay, T. R. (2006). Corporate social responsibility, public policy, and NGO activism in Europe and the united states: An institutional-stakeholder perspective. Journal of Management Studies, 43(1), 47–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. DRL. (2015). DRL programs. Human rights and democracy fund. Bureau of democracy, human rights and labour. Retrieved November 2, 2015, from
  15. EB CSR. (2015). Corporate social responsibility. Bureau of Economic and Business Affairs. Retrieved November 2, 2015, from Scholar
  16. Eccles, R. G., & Krzus, M. P. (2010). One report: Integrated reporting for a sustainable strategy. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  17. Economist. (2015). Everywhere in (supply) chains. How to reduce bonded labour and human trafficking. Retrieved November 19, 2015, from
  18. EITI. (2015). Extractive industries transparencies initiative. Retrieved November 20, 2015, from
  19. EPA. (2015a). Overview by section of the clean air act. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Retrieved November 18, 2015, from
  20. EPA. (2015b). Laws and regulations. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Retrieved November 17, 2015, from
  21. Fifka, M. S. (2013). Corporate citizenship in Germany and the United States–Differing perceptions and practices in transatlantic comparison. Business Ethics: A European Review, 22(4), 341–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Garriga, E., & Melé, D. (2013). Corporate social responsibility theories: Mapping the territory. In A. C. Michalos & D. C. Poff (Eds.), Citation classics from the journal of business ethics (pp. 69–96). Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Greendex. (2012). Consumer choice and the environment. A worldwide tracking survey. Retrieved November 20, 2015, from
  24. HRDF (2015). DRL programs: Human rights and democracy fund. Retrieved November 17, 2015, from
  25. ILO. (2015). Forced labour, human trafficking and slavery. International Labour Organization. Retrieved November 15, 2015, from
  26. INL. (2006). U.S. strategy to internationalize efforts against kleptocracy: Combating high-level public corruption. Denying Safe Haven, and Recovering Assets. Retrieved November 20, 2015, from
  27. INL. (2015). Bureau of International Narcotics and Law Enforcement Affairs (INL). Retrieved November 20, 2015, from
  28. Knudsen, J. S., & Brown, D. (2015). Why governments intervene: Exploring mixed motives for public policies on corporate social responsibility. Public Policy and Administration, 30(1), 51–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kotler, P., & Lee, N. (2005). Corporate social responsibility: Doing the most good for your company and your cause. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
  30. Matten, D., & Crane, A. (2005). Corporate citizenship: Toward an extended theoretical conceptualization. Academy of Management Review, 30(1), 166–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Morsing, M., & Schultz, M. (2006). Corporate social responsibility communication: Stakeholder information, response and involvement strategies. Business Ethics: A European Review, 15(4), 323–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. NEPA. (1969). Summary of the National Environmental Policy Act. Law and Regulations, US Environmental Protection Agency. Retrieved November 16, 2015, from
  33. Neu, D., Warsame, H., & Pedwell, K. (1998). Managing public impressions: Environmental disclosures in Annual Reports. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 23(3), 265–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. New York Times. (2013). Health care’s road to ruin. Retrieved November 14, 2015, from
  35. OECD. (2014). OECD economic surveys United States. Organization for economic cooperation and development. Retrieved October 30, 2015, from
  36. OES. (2015). Mission statement. Bureau of Oceans and International Environmental and Scientific Affairs. Retrieved November 16, 2015, from
  37. Pinkston, T. S., & Carroll, A. B. (1994). Corporate citizenship perspectives and foreign direct investment in the US. Journal of Business Ethics, 13(3), 157–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. PPACA. (2010). The patient protection and affordable care act: An overview of its potential impact on state health programs. Retrieved October 2, 2015, from
  39. Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2002). The competitive advantage of corporate philanthropy. Harvard Business Review, 80(12), 56–68.Google Scholar
  40. Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2011). Creating shared value: How to reinvent capitalism—And unleash a wave of innovation and growth. Harvard Business Review, (January/February), 62–77.Google Scholar
  41. Reuters. (2010). Factbox-U.S. healthcare bill would provide immediate benefits. Retrieved October, 2015, from
  42. Schwartz, M. S., & Carroll, A. B. (2003). Corporate social responsibility: A three-domain approach. Business Ethics Quarterly, 13(04), 503–530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. SDGs. (2015). Sustainable development goals. Retrieved November 17, 2015, from
  44. SSA. (2017). Social welfare in the United States. Retrieved November 19, 2015, from
  45. Strand, R., & Freeman, R. E. (2013). Scandinavian cooperative advantage: The theory and practice of stakeholder engagement in Scandinavia. Journal of Business Ethics, 127(1), 65–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Swanson, D. L. (2014). Embedding CSR into corporate culture: Challenging the executive mind. New York: Palgrave MacMillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. TIP. (2015). Office to monitor and combat trafficking in persons. Retrieved November 14, 2015, from
  48. U.S. Geological Survey. (2010). Mineral commodity summaries. U.S. Department of the Interior. Retrieved November 10, 2015, from
  49. UNGBPHR. (2011). United Nations guiding principles business and human rights. Retrieved November 17, 2015, from
  50. Varadarajan, P. R., & Menon, A. (1988). Cause-related marketing: A co-alignment of marketing strategy and corporate philanthropy. The Journal of Marketing, 52, 58–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Wartick, S. L., & Cochran, P. L. (1985). The evolution of the corporate social performance model. Academy of Management Review, 10(4), 758–769.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Wheeler, D., Colbert, B., & Freeman, R. E. (2003). Focusing on value: Reconciling corporate social responsibility, stakeholder theory and sustainability in a network world. Journal of General Management, 28(3), 1–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Wood, D. J. (1991). Corporate social performance revisited. Academy of Management Review, 16(4), 691–718.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. WorldWatch. (2015). U.S. must commit to sustainability to overcome mounting economic and ecological strains. Retrieved November 25, 2015, from

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Open Access This chapter is licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 2.5 International License (, which permits any noncommercial use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license and indicate if changes were made.

The images or other third party material in this chapter are included in the chapter's Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the chapter's Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mark Anthony Camilleri
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Corporate CommunicationUniversity of MaltaMsidaMalta

Personalised recommendations