International Policies and Regulatory Instruments for Non-financial Reporting

  • Mark Anthony Camilleri


Corporate social responsibility (CSR) often involves the development of network relations as both private and government actors invest in and draw upon social capital (Habisch & Moon, 2006). CSR necessitates legal compliance as well as ‘customary ethics’ (Carroll, 1991). In this context, it seems that a motivation for CSR may be borne out as a necessity to offset the threat of regulation. ‘Many companies prefer to be one step ahead of government legislation or intervention, to anticipate social pressures themselves’, (Moon & Richardson, 1985, p. 137 in Crane, Matten, & Spence, 2008, p. 308). Therefore, non-governmental organisations (NGOs ) sought to step into the regulatory vacuum created by the inadequacies of both national governments and international institutions to regulate multinational corporations (MNCs ) by forging alliances with consumers, institutional investors and companies themselves (Newell, 2000, pp. 117–118). While they cannot replace the role of the state, these social movements have created new mechanisms of global business regulation. According to Knill and Lehmkuhl (2002, p. 442); global corporate responsibility is intended to compensate for the decreasing capacities of national governments for providing public goods. CSR may have represented an effort to challenge the increasing reluctance of national governments to impose regulations on global firms that could have discouraged domestic investment. Hence, the aim of this chapter is to better understand how business and government may become more aligned with regards to the regulatory aspect of CSR. This contribution suggests that there is scope for governments to take an active leading role in triggering responsible behaviours among firms. The businesses themselves will realise that appropriate environmental, social and governance regulations can bring in economic value as well.


  1. Agenda 21. (1992). United Nations Sustainable Development Conference, Rio de Janerio, Brazil, 13 June. Retrieved January 3, 2016, from
  2. Albareda, L., Lozano, J. M., Tencati, A., Midttun, A., & Perrini, F. (2008). The changing role of governments in corporate social responsibility: Drivers and responses. Business Ethics: A European Review, 17, 347–363. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8608.2008.00539.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aras, G., & Crowther, D. (2009). Corporate sustainability reporting: A study in disingenuity? Journal of Business Ethics, 87(1), 279–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Berkhout, F., Hertin, J., Wagner, M., & Tyteca, D. (2008). Are EMS environmentally effective? The link between environmental management systems and environmental performance in European companies. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 51(2), 259–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bondy, K., Moon, J., & Matten, D. (2012). An institution of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) in Multi-National Corporations (MNCs): Form and implications. Journal of Business Ethics. Retrieved May 3, 2016, from
  6. Camilleri, M. A. (2015). Environmental, social and governance disclosures in Europe. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 6(2), 224–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Carroll, A. B. (1991). The pyramid of corporate social responsibility: Toward the moral management of organizational stakeholders. Business Horizons, 34(4), 39–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Crane, A., & Matten, D. (2004). Business ethics. A European perspective. Managing corporate citizenship and sustainability in the age of globalization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Crane, A., Matten, D., & Spence, L. J. (2008). Corporate social responsibility: Readings and cases in global context (Vol. 1, pp. 3–20). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  10. Crane, A., McWilliams, A., Matten, D., Moon, J., & Siegel, D. (2009). The Oxford handbook of corporate social responsibility. Oxford: Oxford Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. DBIS. (2013). Department for Business, Innovation and Skills—Corporate Responsibility: A Government Update. Retrieved Feburary 3, 2016, from
  12. De Tomasi, D. A. (2006). International regimes: The case of Western Corporate Governance. International Studies Review, 8, pp. 225–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Du, S., Bhattacharya, C. B., & Sen, S. (2010). Maximizing business returns to Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR): The role of CSR communication. International Journal of Management Reviews, 12, 8–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. EU. (2007). National public policies in the European Union. Directorate-General for Employment, Social Affairs and Equal Opportunities. Brussels: Enterprise Publications.Google Scholar
  15. EU. (2011). A renewed EU strategy 2011–2014 for Corporate Social Responsibility. Retrieved Feburary 3, 2016, from
  16. EU. (2012). Sustainable and responsible business European Expert Group on Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) and SMEs. Retrieved January 12, 2016, from
  17. EU. (2014). Non-financial reporting. Retrieved June 5, 2016, from
  18. EY. (2013). Ernst young: Corporate Social Responsibility in India potential to contribute towards inclusive social development Global CSR Summit 2013. An Agenda for Inclusive Growth. Retrieved May 5, 2016, from$File/EY-Corporate-Social-Responsibility-in-India.pdf
  19. Fair Trade Foundation. (2012, May 4). What is Fair Trade?
  20. Fukukawa, K., & Moon, J. (2004). A Japanese model of corporate social responsibility? A study of website reporting. Journal of Corporate Citizenship, 16, 45–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gilbert, D. U., & Rasche, A. (2007). Discourse ethics and social accountability—The ethics of SA 8000. Business Ethics Quarterly, 17(2), 187–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Golob, U., Podnar, K., Elving, W. J., Nielsen, A. E., Thomsen, C., & Schultz, F. (2013). CSR communication: Quo vadis? Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 18(2), 176–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Habisch, A., & Jeremy Moon, J. (2006). Social capital and corporate social responsibility. The Challenge of Organizing and Implementing Corporate Social Responsibility, 63–77.Google Scholar
  24. Hess, D. (2001). Regulating corporate social performance: A new look at corporate social accounting, auditing, and reporting. Business Ethics Quarterly, 11(2), 307–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. IB. (2014, April 1–7). Indian Business: Weekly Economic Bulletin. ITP, Division Ministry of External Affairs, Government of India. Retrieved May 10, 2016, from
  26. India Companies Act. (2013). Insight series—Volume IV corporate social responsibility. Retrieved September 12, 2013, from
  27. Jamali, D., Safieddine, A. M., & Rabbath, M. (2008). Corporate governance and corporate social responsibility synergies and interrelationships. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 16, 443–459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Jesover, F., & Kirkpatrick, G. (2005). The revised OECD principles of corporate governance and their relevance to Non-OECD countries. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 13, 127–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Jiang, R. J., & Bansal, P. (2003). Seeing the need for ISO 14001. Journal of Management Studies, 40, 1047–1067.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kjærgaard, A., & Morsing, M. (2012). A case study of how social media guidelines are used to discipline employee behaviour (pp. 5–7). Helsinki: European Group of Organizational Studies (EGOS).Google Scholar
  31. Klettner, A., Clarke, T., & Boersma, M. (2013). The governance of corporate sustainability: Empirical insights into the development, leadership and implementation of responsible business strategy. Journal of Business Ethics, 1–21.Google Scholar
  32. Knill, C., & Lehmkuhl, D. (2002). The national impact of European Union regulatory policy: Three Europeanization mechanisms. European Journal of Political Research, 41(2), 255–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Leipziger, D. (2001). SA 8000: The definitive guide to the new social standard. London: FT Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  34. Leipziger, D. (2003). The corporate responsibility code book. Sheffield: Greenleaf.Google Scholar
  35. Mendoza, X. (1996). Las transformaciones del sector público en las sociedades avanzadas. Del estado del bienestar al estado relacional (Papers de Formació 23 Diputació de Barcelona).Google Scholar
  36. Michelon, G., & Parbonetti, A. (2012). The effect of corporate governance on sustainability disclosure. Journal of Management and Governance, 16(3), 477–509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Midttun, A. (2005). Policy making and the role of government. Realigning business, government and civil society. Emerging embedded relational governance beyond the (neo) liberal and welfare state models. Corporate Governance: International Journal of Business in Society, 5(3), 159–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Moon, J., & Richardson, J. J. (1985). Unemployment in the UK: Politics and policies. Aldershot: Gower.Google Scholar
  39. Moon, J., & Sochacki, R. (1996). The social responsibility of business in job and enterprise creation: Motives. Means and Implications. Australian Quarterly, 11–30.Google Scholar
  40. Morsing, M., & Schultz, M. (2006). Corporate social responsibility communication: Stakeholder information, response and involvement strategies. Business Ethics: A European Review, 15, 323–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Mueller, M., Dos Santos, V., & Seuring, S. (2009). The contribution of environmental and social standards towards ensuring legitimacy in supply chain governance. Journal of Business Ethics, 89(4), 509–523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Newell, P. (2000). Oceans apart? Comparing business responses to the environment in Europe and North America. Environment, 42(9), 8–20.Google Scholar
  43. Newell, P. (2002). From responsibility to citizenship: Corporate accountability for development. IDS Bulletin, 33(2) Making rights real: Exploring citizenship, participation and accountability. Brighton: IDS.Google Scholar
  44. Nielsen, A. E., & Thomsen, C. (2007). Reporting CSR—What and how to say it? Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 12(1), 25–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. OECD. (1999). Basic principles of corporate governance. Organisation for Economic Cooperation And Development, Directorate for Financial and Enterprise Affairs. Retrieved January 2, 2016, from,3343,en_2649_34813_31530865_1_1_1_1,00.html
  46. Rasche, A. (2007). The paradoxical foundation of strategic management. Heidelberg: Springer.Google Scholar
  47. Rasche, A. (2009). Toward a model to compare and analyze accountability standards—The case of the UN Global Compact. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 16(4), 192–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Rasche, A. (2010). Collaborative governance 2.0. Corporate Governance, 10(4), 500–511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Rasche, A., & Esser, D. E. (2006). From stakeholder management to stakeholder accountability—Applying Habermasian discourse ethics to accountability research. Journal of Business Ethics, 65(3), 251–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Rasche, A., Baur, D., Van Huijstee, M., Ladek, S., & Naidu, J. (2008). Corporations as political actors—A report on the first Swiss Master Class in corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 80(2), 151–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Reynolds, M., & Yuthas, K. (2008). Moral discourse and corporate social responsibility reporting. Journal of Business Ethics, 78(1–2), 47–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Schoeneborn, D., & Trittin, H. (2013). Transcending transmission: Towards a constitutive perspective on CSR communication. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 18(2), 193–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Simpson, D., Power, D., & Klassen, R. (2012). When one size does not fit all: A problem of fit rather than failure for voluntary management standards. Retrieved May 3, 2016, from
  54. Stenzel, P. L. (2000). Can the ISO 14000 series environmental management standards provide a viable alternative to government regulation? American Business Law Journal, 37(2), 237–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Vogel, D. (2005). The market for virtue: The potential and limits of corporate social responsibility. Washington, DC: Brookings Institute.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Open Access This chapter is licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 2.5 International License (, which permits any noncommercial use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license and indicate if changes were made.

The images or other third party material in this chapter are included in the chapter's Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the chapter's Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mark Anthony Camilleri
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Corporate CommunicationUniversity of MaltaMsidaMalta

Personalised recommendations