Hand-Held Sound-Speed Imaging Based on Ultrasound Reflector Delineation

Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 9900)

Abstract

A novel hand-held speed-of-sound (SoS) imaging method is proposed, which requires only minor hardware extensions to conventional ultrasound (US) B-mode systems. A hand-held reflector is used as a timing reference for US signals. A robust reflector-detection algorithm, based on dynamic programming (DP), achieves unambiguous timing even with 10 dB signal-to-noise ratio in real tissues, successfully detecting delays <100 ns introduced by SoS heterogeneities. An Anisotropically-Weighted Total-Variation (AWTV) regularization based on L1-norm smoothness reconstruction is shown to achieve significant improvements in the delineation of focal lesions. The Contrast-to-noise-ratio (CNR) is improved from 15 dB to 37 dB, and the axial resolution loss from >300 % to <15 %. Experiments with breast-mimicking phantoms and ex-vivo liver samples showed, for hard hypoechogenic inclusions not visible in B-mode US, a high SoS contrast (2.6 %) with respect to cystic inclusions (0.9 %) and the background SoS noise (0.6 %). We also tested our method on a healthy volunteer in a preliminary in-vivo test. The proposed technique demonstrates potential for low-cost and non-ionizing screening, as well as for diagnostics in daily clinical routine.

References

  1. 1.
    Crimi, A., Makhinya, M., Baumann, U., Thalhammer, C., et al.: Automatic measurement of venous pressure using B-mode ultrasound. IEEE TMI 63, 288–299 (2016)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Duric, N., Littrup, P., Li, C., Roy, O., Schmidt, S., et al.: Breast imaging with softVue: initial clinical examination. In: SPIE Medical Imaging, pp. 90400V (2014)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Duric, N., Littrup, P., Poulo, L., Babkin, A., Pevzner, R., Holsapple, E.: Detection of breast cancer with ultrasound tomography: first results with the computer ultrasound risk evaluation (cure) prototype. Med. Phys. 34, 773–785 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Foroughi, P., Boctor, E., et al.: Ultrasound bone segmentation using dynamic programming. In: IEEE Ultras Symposium, New York, NY, USA, pp. 2523–2526 (2007)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Gemmeke, H., Ruiter, N.V.: 3D ultrasound computer tomography for medical imaging. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A 580, 1057–1065 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Huang, S.W., Pai-Chi, L.: Ultrasonic computed tomography reconstruction of the attenuation coefficient using a linear array. IEEE TUFFC 52, 2011–2022 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kak, A.C., Slaney, M.: Principles of computerized tomographic imaging. IEEE Press, New York (1988)MATHGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kolb, T.M., Lichy, J., Newhouse, J.H.: Comparison of the performance of screening mammography, physical examination, and breast us and evaluation of factors that influence them: an analysis of 27,825 patient evaluation. Radiology 225, 165–175 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Krueger, M., Burow, V., et al.: Limited-angle us transmission tomography of the compressed female breast. In: IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium, Miyagi, Japan, pp. 1345–1348 (1998)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Nebeker, J., Nelson, T.R.: Imaging of sound speed using reflection ultrasound tomography. J. Ultrasound Med. 31, 1389–1404 (2012)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Radovan, J., Peterlik, I., et al.: Sound-speed image reconstruction in sparse-aperture 3-D us transmission tomography. IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelectr., Freq. Control 59, 254–264 (2012)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Sanabria, S.J., Hilbers, U., et al.: Modeling and prediction of density distribution and microstructure in particleboards from acoustic properties by correlation of non-contact high-resolution pulsed air-coupled ultrasound and X-ray images. Ultrasonics 53, 157–170 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Siu, A., U.S. Preventive Services Task Force: Screening for breast cancer: U.S. preventive services task force recommendation. Ann. Int. Med. 164(4), 279–296 (2016). doi:10.7326/M15-2886 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Computer-assisted Applications in MedicineETH ZurichZurichSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations