Preliminary Extraction of Themes from a Review About User Perspectives on Assistive Technology for the Upper Limb After Stroke
Use of assistive technology to support the upper extremity of stoke survivors seems promising. Attention for the needs and preferences of the end-user from the start of the design is crucial to avoid device abandonment. The aim of this study was to gain insight into the factors that play a role in the successful use of upper extremity assistive technology in rehabilitation and daily life activities of stroke survivors through a systematic analysis of the literature. Six qualitative studies have been retrieved from PubMed, Scopus, CINAHL, Embase, PsycINFO and additional reference tracking. Analysis of user expressions resulted in the specification of three overarching themes: accessibility, usage and personalization.
This study is partly funded by Horizon 2020 (call ICT-22-2014) under grant no. 64400.
- 2.WHO, Recommendations on stroke prevention, diagnosis, and therapy. Report of the WHO Task Force on Stroke and other Cerebrovascular Disorders, Stroke, 20, 1407–1431 (1989)Google Scholar
- 3.P. Maciejasz, J. Eschweiler, K. Gerlach-Hahn, A. Jansen-Troy, S. Leonhardt, A survery on robotic devices for upper limb rehabilitation. J. Neuroeng. Rehabil. 11 (2014)Google Scholar
- 4.B. Radder et al., User-centred input for a wearable soft-robotic glove supporting hand function in daily life, in IEEE International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics (ICORR) (2015)Google Scholar
- 5.A.M. Hughes et al., Translation of evidence-based assistive technologies into stroke rehabilitation: users’ perceptions of the barriers and opportunities. BMC Health Serv. Res. 14 (2014)Google Scholar
- 6.D.J. Reinkensmeyer et al., Major trends in mobility technology research and development: overview of the results of the NSF-WTEC European study. J. Neuroeng. Rehabil. 9 (2012)Google Scholar
- 8.G.B. Prange et al., User requirements for assistance of the supporting hand in bimanual daily activities via a robotic glove for severely affected stroke patients, in IEEE International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics (ICORR) (2015)Google Scholar
- 9.Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP), Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) (2016), http://www.casp-uk.net. Accessed 24 Sep 2015
- 10.J. Thomas, A. Harden, Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews. BMC Med. Res. Methodol. 8 (2008)Google Scholar
- 12.N. Nasr et al., The experience of living with stroke and using technology: opportunities to engage and co-design with end users. Disabil. Rehabil. Assist. Technol. 1–8 (2015)Google Scholar
- 13.M.Y. Lam et al., Perceptions of technology and its use for therapeutic application for individuals with hemiparesis: findings from adult and pediatric focus groups. JMIR Rehabil. Assist. Technol. 2 (2015)Google Scholar
- 15.S. Demain et al, Assistive technologies after stroke: self-management or fending for yourself? A focus group study. BMC Health Serv. Res. 13 (2013)Google Scholar
- 16.C. Abras, D. Maloney-Krichmar, J. Preece, User-centered design, in W. Encyclopedia of Human-Computer Interaction, vol. 37 (Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, 2004) pp. 445–456Google Scholar