Thermoregulation in Homo erectus and the Neanderthals: A Reassessment Using a Segmented Model

Chapter
First Online:
Part of the Vertebrate Paleobiology and Paleoanthropology book series (VERT)

Abstract

Thermoregulation is widely believed to have influenced body size and shape in the two best-known extinct members of genus Homo , Homo erectus and Homo neanderthalensis , and to have done so in contrasting ways. H. erectus is thought to have been warm adapted, while H. neanderthalensis is widely held to have been cold adapted. However, the methods that have been used to arrive at these conclusions ignore differences among body segments in a number of thermoregulation-related variables. We carried out a study designed to determine whether the current consensus regarding the thermoregulatory implications of the size and shape of the bodies of H. erectus and H. neanderthalensis is supported when body segment differences in surface area, skin temperature , and rate of movement are taken into account.

The study involved estimating heat loss for a number of Holocene modern human skeletal samples and several fossil hominin specimens, including five Pleistocene H. sapiens , the well-known H. erectus partial skeleton KNM-WT 15000, a H. erectus specimen from Dmanisi, Georgia, and three Neanderthals. The resulting heat loss estimates were then used in two sets of comparative analyses. In the first, we focused on whole-body heat loss and tested predictions concerning heat loss in KNM-WT 15000 and European Neanderthals relative to modern humans, and within H. erectus and H. neanderthalensis. In the second set of analyses we again tested predictions concerning heat loss in H. erectus and H. neanderthalensis relative to modern humans, and within H. erectus and H. neanderthalensis, but this time we focused on the contribution of their limbs to heat loss.

The results of the study do not fully support the current consensus regarding the thermoregulatory adaptations of Homo erectus and Homo neanderthalensis. The whole-body heat loss estimates were consistent with the idea that KNM-WT 15000 was warm adapted and that European Neanderthals were cold adapted, and with the notion that there are thermoregulation-related differences in body size and shape within H erectus and H. neanderthalensis. The whole-limb estimates told a similar story. In contrast, the results of our analysis of limb segment-specific heat loss were not consistent with the current consensus regarding the thermoregulatory significance of distal limb length in H. erectus and H. neanderthalensis. Contrary to expectation, differences between the proximal and distal limb segments did not follow any particular trend.

The obvious implication of these results is that, while we can be more confident about the basic idea that thermoregulation influenced the evolution of body size and shape in H. erectus and H. neanderthalensis , we need to be more cautious in attributing differences in limb segment size to thermoregulation. Based on our results, it is possible that other factors influenced limb segment size in these species more than thermoregulation. Identifying these factors will require further research.

Keywords

Body size Hominin evolution Thermoregulation Homo neanderthalensis Limb proportions 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Notes

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Yoel Rak not only for his friendship and guidance but also for the inspiration he has provided through his research. In addition, we are grateful to Assaf Maron and Erella Hovers for inviting us to contribute to this volume, and to two anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments. Our work was supported by the Social Sciences and Humanities Research of Canada, the Canada Research Chairs Program, the Canada Foundation for Innovation, the British Columbia Knowledge Development Fund, and Simon Fraser University.

References

  1. Buono, M. J. (2000). Limb vs. trunk sweat gland recruitment patterns during exercise in humans. Journal of Thermal Biology, 25, 263–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Collard, M., Tarle, L., Sandgathe, D., & Allan, A. (2016). Faunal evidence for a difference in clothing use between Neanderthals and early modern humans in Europe. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology, 44, 235–246.Google Scholar
  3. Cross, A., & Collard, M. (2011). Estimating surface area in early hominins. PLoS ONE, 6, e16107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cross, A., Collard, M., & Nelson, A. (2008). Body segment differences in surface area, skin temperature and 3D displacement and the estimation of heat balance during locomotion in hominins. PLoS ONE, 3, e2464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Dennis, S. C., & Noakes, T. D. (1999). Advantages of smaller body mass in humans when distance-running in warm, humid conditions. European Journal of Applied Physiology, 79, 280–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Du Bois, D., & Du Bois, E. F. (1916). A formula to estimate the approximate surface area if height and weight be known. Archives of Internal Medicine, 17, 863–871.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Feldesman, M. R., & Fountain, R. L. (1996). “Race” specificity and the femur/stature ratio. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 100, 207–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Froehle, A., & Churchill, S. E. (2009). Energetic competition between Neandertals and anatomically modern humans. PaleoAnthropology, 2009, 96–116.Google Scholar
  9. Haeuseler, M. (2001). New insights into the locomotion of Australopithecus africanus: Implications of the partial skeleton of STW 431 (Sterkfontein, South Africa). Ph.D. Dissertation, Universität Zürich.Google Scholar
  10. Haeusler, M., & McHenry, H. M. (2004). Body proportions of Homo habilis reviewed. Journal of Human Evolution, 46, 433–465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Haycock, G. B., Chir, B., Schwartz, G. J., & Wisotsky, D. H. (1978). Geometric method for measuring body surface area: A height-weight formula validated in infants, children, and adults. The Journal of Pediatrics, 93, 62–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hinrichs, R., & Cavanagh, P. (1981). Upper extremity function in treadmill walking. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 13, 96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Higgins, R. W., & Ruff, C. B. (2011). The effects of distal limb segment shortening on locomotor efficiency in sloped terrain: Implications for Neandertal locomotor behavior. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 146, 336–345.Google Scholar
  14. Holliday, T. W. (1997). Postcranial evidence of cold adaptation in European Neandertals. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 104, 245–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Holliday, T. W., & Ruff, C. B. (2001). Relative variation in human proximal and distal limb segment lengths. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 116, 26–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Houdas, Y., & Ring, E. F. J. (1982). Human body temperature: Its measurement and regulation. New York: Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Langlois, J. A., Keyl, P. M., Guralnik, J. M., Foley, D. J., Marottoli, R. A., & Wallace, R. B. (1997). Characteristics of older pedestrians who have difficulty crossing the street. American Journal of Public Health, 87, 393–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lordkipanidze, D., Jashashvili, T., Vekua, A., Ponce de León, M. S., Zollikofer, C. P. E., Rightmire, G. P., et al. (2007). Postcranial evidence from early Homo from Dmanisi, Georgia. Nature, 449, 305–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Marino, F. E., Lambert, M. I., & Noakes, T. D. (2004). Superior performance of African runners in warm humid but not in cool environmental conditions. Journal of Applied Physiology, 96, 124–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Neptune, R. R., Sasaki, K., & Kautz, S. A. (2008). The effect of walking speed on muscle function and mechanical energetics. Gait Posture, 28, 135–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Oliveira, A. V. M., Gaspa, A. R., Francisco, S. C., & Quintela, D. A. (2011). Convective heat transfer from nude body under calm conditions: Assessment of the effect of walking with a thermal manikin. International Journal of Biometeorology, 56, 319–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Orendurff, M. S., Segal, A. D., Klute, G. K., Berge, J. S., Rohr, E. S., & Kadel, N. J. (2004). The effect of walking speed on center of mass displacement. Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development, 41, 829–834.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Quintela, D., Gaspar, A., & Borges, C. (2004). Analysis of sensible heat exchanges from a thermal manikin. European Journal of Applied Physiology, 92, 663–668.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Raxter, M. H., Ruff, C. B., Azab, A., Erfan, M., Soliman, M., & El-Sawaf, A. (2008). Stature estimation in ancient Egyptians: A new technique based on anatomical reconstruction of stature. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 136, 147–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Ruff, C. B. (1991). Climate and body shape in hominid evolution. Journal of Human Evolution, 21, 81–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Ruff, C. B. (1993). Climatic adaptation and hominid evolution: The thermoregulatory imperative. Evolutionary Anthropology, 2, 53–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Ruff, C. B. (1994). Morphological adaptations to climate in modern and fossil hominids. Yearbook of Physical Anthropology, 37, 65–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Ruff, C. B. (2010). Body size and body shape in early hominins – implications of the Gona pelvis. Journal of Human Evolution, 58, 166–178.Google Scholar
  29. Ruff, C. B., & Walker, A. (1993). Body size and body shape. In A. Walker & R. E. Leakey (Eds.), The Nariokotome Homo erectus skeleton (pp. 234–265). Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Ruff, C. B., Trinkaus, E., & Holliday, T. W. (1997). Body mass and encephalization in Pleistocene Homo. Nature, 387, 173–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Ruff, C. B., Niskanen, M., Junno, J.-A., & Jamison, P. (2005). Body mass prediction from stature and bi-iliac breadth in two high latitude populations, with application to earlier higher latitude humans. Journal of Human Evolution, 48, 381–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Sørenson, B. (2009). Energy use by Eem Neanderthals. Journal of Archaeological Science, 36, 2201–2205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Tilkens, M. J., Wall-Scheffler, C., Weaver, T., & Steudel-Numbers, K. (2007). The effects of body proportions on thermoregulation: An experimental assessment of Allen’s rule. Journal of Human Evolution, 53, 286–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Trinkaus, E. (1981). Neanderthal limb proportions and cold adaptation. In C. B. Stringer (Ed.), Aspects of human evolution (pp. 187–224). London: Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar
  35. Trotter, M. L., & Gleser, G. C. (1952). Estimation of stature from long bones of American whites and negroes. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 10, 463–514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Trotter, M. L., & Gleser, G. (1958). A re-evaluation of stature based on measurements taken during life and of long bones after death. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 16, 79–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Weaver, T. D. (2003). The shape of the Neanderthal femur is primarily the consequence of a hyperpolar body form. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 100, 6926–6929.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Weaver, T. D., Roseman, C. C., & Stringer, C. B. (2007). Were Neandertal and modern human cranial differences produced by natural selection or genetic drift? Journal of Human Evolution, 53, 135–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Wheeler, P. E. (1993). The influence of stature and body form on hominid energy and water budgets; a comparison of Australopithecus and early Homo physiques. Journal of Human Evolution, 24, 13–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Human Evolutionary Studies Program and Department of ArchaeologySimon Fraser UniversityBurnabyCanada
  2. 2.Department of ArchaeologyUniversity of Aberdeen St. Mary’s BuildingAberdeenUK

Personalised recommendations