Advertisement

EnergyUse - A Collective Semantic Platform for Monitoring and Discussing Energy Consumption

  • Grégoire BurelEmail author
  • Lara S. G. Piccolo
  • Harith Alani
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 9982)

Abstract

Conserving fossil-based energy to reduce carbon emissions is key to slowing down global warming. The 2015 Paris agreement on climate change emphasised the importance of raising public awareness and participation to address this societal challenge. In this paper we introduce EnergyUse; a collective platform for raising awareness on climate change, by enabling users to view and compare the actual energy consumption of various appliances, and to share and discuss energy conservation tips in an open and social environment. The platform collects data from smart plugs, and exports appliance consumption information and community generated energy tips as linked data. In this paper we report on the system design, data modelling, platform usage and early deployment with a set of 58 initial participants. We also discuss the challenges, lessons learnt, and future platform developments.

Keywords

Energy consumption Climate change Semantic collective platforms Energy monitors 

Notes

Acknowledgement

This work is funded by the EC-FP7 project DecarboNet (grant number 610829).

References

  1. 1.
    Abrahamse, W., et al.: A review of intervention studies aimed at household energy conservation. J. Environ. Psychol. 25(3), 273–291 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ackerman, F., Stanton, E.A.: The cost of climate change: what well pay if global warming continues unchecked (2008). https://www.nrdc.org/sites/default/files/cost.pdf
  3. 3.
    Allcott, H.: Social norms and energy conservation. J. Public Econ. 95(9), 1082–1095 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Breslin, J.G., Harth, A., Bojars, U., Decker, S.: Towards semantically-interlinked online communities. In: Gómez-Pérez, A., Euzenat, J. (eds.) ESWC 2005. LNCS, vol. 3532, pp. 500–514. Springer, Heidelberg (2005). doi: 10.1007/11431053_34 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Daiber, J., Jakob, M., Hokamp, C., Mendes, P.N.: Improving efficiency and accuracy in multilingual entity extraction. In: Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Semantic Systems (I-Semantics) (2013)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Darby, S.: Literature review for the energy demand research project. Ofgem (Office of Gas and Electricity Markets), London (2010)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Erhardt-Martinez, K., Donnelly, K., Laitner, J.: Advanced metering initiatives, residential feedback programs: a metareview for household energy-saving opportunities. Report no. E105. American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy, Washington, DC (2010)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Agency, E.E.: Achieving energy efficiency through behaviour change: what does it that? Technical report N5/2013 (2013)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hargreaves, T., Nye, M., Burgess, J.: Making energy visible: a qualitative field study of how householders interact with feedback from smart energy monitors. Energ. Policy 38(10), 6111–6119 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Letwin, O., Barker, G., Stunell, A.: Behaviour change and energy use. Cabinet Office: Behavioural Insights Team (2011)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lorenzoni, I., Langford, I.H.: Climate change now, in the future: a mixed methodological study of public perceptions in norwich (UK) (2001). http://www.cserge.ac.uk/sites/default/files/ecm_2001_05.pdf
  12. 12.
    Maynard, D., Bontcheva, K.: Understanding climate change tweets: an open source toolkit for social media analysis. In: 29th International Conference on Informatics for Environmental Protection (EnviroInfo 2015), Copenhagen (2015)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    United Nations: Adoption of the paris agreement (2015). https://unfccc.int/resource/docs/2015/cop21/eng/l09r01.pdf
  14. 14.
    Neustaedter, C., Bartram, L., Mah, A.: Everyday activities, energy consumption: how families understand the relationship. In: Proceedings of CHI 2013, Paris, France (2013)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    O’Neill, S., Nicholson-Cole, S.: Fear wont do it: promoting positive engagement with climate change through visual and iconic representations. Sci. Commun. 30(3), 355–379 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Parnell, L.D., Lindenbaum, P., Shameer, K., Dall’Olio, G.M., Swan, D.C., Jensen, L.J., Cockell, S.J., Pedersen, B.S., Mangan, M.E., Miller, C.A., Albert, I.: Biostar: an online question & answer resource for the bioinformatics community. PLoS Comput. Biol. 7(10), 1–5 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Petkov, P., Goswami, S., Köbler, F., Krcmar, H.: Personalised eco-feedback as a design technique for motivating energy saving behaviour at home. In: Proceedings of the 7th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Making Sense Through Design, NordiCHI 2012, Copenhagen, Denmark. ACM (2012)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Petkov, P., Köbler, F., Foth, M., Krcmar, H.: Motivating domestic energy conservation through comparative, community-based feedback in mobile and social media. In: 5th International Conference on Communities & Technologies (C&T 2011), Brisbane, Australia, June 2011Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Piccolo, L., Baranauskas, C., Fernandez, M., Alani, H., de Liddo, A.: Energy consumption awareness in the workplace: technical artefacts and practices. In: Proceedings of the 13th Brazilian Symposium on Human Factors in Computing Systems (IHC 2014), Parana, Brazil (2014)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Pierce, J., Paulos, E.: Beyond energy monitors: interaction, energy, and emerging energy systems. In: Proceedings of CHI 2012, Texas, US (2012)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Stern, P.C., Dietz, T., Abel, T., Guagnano, G.A., Kalof, L.: A value belief norm theory of support for social movements: the case of environmental concern. Hum. Ecol. Rev. 6(8), 81–97 (1999)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Sterner, T.: Economics: higher costs of climate change. Nature 527, 177–178 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Sweney, M.: Government’s 6m climate change ads cleared. Guardian (2010). http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2010/oct/11/governmentclimate-change-ad
  24. 24.
    Umpfenbach, K.: Influences on consumer behaviour. Policy implications beyond nudging. Final report. Ecologic institute, Berlin (2014)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    van der Linden, S.: Towards a new model for communicating climate change. In: Cohen, S., Higham, J., Peeters, P., Gossling, S. (eds.) Understanding and Governing Sustainable Tourism Mobility: Psychological and Behavioural Approaches, pp. 243–275. Routledge, Taylor and Francis (2014)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Grégoire Burel
    • 1
    Email author
  • Lara S. G. Piccolo
    • 1
  • Harith Alani
    • 1
  1. 1.Knowledge Media Institute (KMi)The Open UniversityMilton KeynesUK

Personalised recommendations