Intraoperative Monitoring in Tethered Cord Surgery

Chapter

Abstract

The tethered cord syndrome is caused by abnormal fixation of the spinal cord with resultant reduction in blood flow leading to impaired oxidative metabolism of the grey matter. Etiologies include embryological derangement, trauma, and surgery. Common symptoms include but are not limited to pain, weakness, loss of sensation, and bowel/bladder dysfunction. Surgical release allows normalization of blood flow and then parallel neurological improvement. Goals of neurosurgery to correct tethered cord are full release of restricted tissue and preservation of involved neural structures. Because of difficulty identifying neural elements based on anatomic appearance, multimodality neurophysiologic monitoring is employed to minimize risk and preserve function, especially bowel and bladder control. A technique using spontaneous and evoked electromyography, somatosensory-evoked potentials, motor-evoked potentials, bulbocavernosus reflex elicitation, and bladder pressure urometry was successfully integrated into the surgical release of this patient’s tethered cord.

Keywords

IOM Tethered cord surgery Tethered cord syndrome (TCS) Anesthetic management Intraoperative neuromonitoring Somatosensory-evoked potentials Transcranial motor-evoked potentials Electromyography, bladder pressure urometry Bulbocavernosus reflex 

References1

  1. 1.
    Aufschnaiter K, Fellner F, Wurm G. Surgery in adult tethered cord syndrome (ATCS): review of literature on occasion of an exceptional case. Neurosurg Rev. 2008;31:371–84.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hertzler DA, DePowell JJ, Stevenson CB, Mangano FT. Tethered cord syndrome: a review of the literature from embryology to adult presentation. Neurosurg Focus. 2010;29(1):E1.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Huang SL, Peng J, Yuan GL, Ding XY, He XJ, Lan BS. A new model of tethered cord syndrome produced by slow traction. Sci Rep. 2015;5:9116.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Lee GY, Paradiso G, Tator CH, Gentili F, Massicotte EM, Fehlings MG. Surgical management of tethered cord syndrome in adults: indications, techniques, and long-term outcomes in 60 patients. J Neurosurg Spine. 2006;4:123–31.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Garg K, Tandon V, Kumar R, Sharma BS, Mahapatra AK. Management of adult tethered cord syndrome: our experience and review of literature. Neurol India. 2014;62:137–42.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Coung JB, Tubbs RS, Oakes WJ. Tethered cord syndrome in children: a review. Neurosurg Focus. 2007;23(2):E2.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    *Yamada S, Lonser RR. Adult tethered cord syndrome. J Spinal Disord. 2000;13(4):319–23.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Romagna A, Suchorska B, Schwartz C, Tonn JC, Zausinger S. Detethering of a congenital tethered cord in adult patients: an outcome analysis. Acta Neurochir. 2013;155:793–800.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Deletis V, Sala F. Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring of the spinal cord during spinal cord and spine surgery: a review focus on the corticospinal tracts. Clin Neurophysiol. 2008;119:248–64.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Jackson EM, Schwartz DM, Sestokas AK, Zarnow DM, Adzick NS, Johnson MP, et al. Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring in patients undergoing tethered cord surgery after myelomeningocele repair. J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2014;13:355–61.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kothbauer K, Schmid UD, Seiler RW, Eisner W. Intraoperative motor and sensory monitoring of the cauda equina. Neurosurgery. 1994;34(4):702–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Sala F, Krzan MJ, Deletis V. Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring in pediatric neurosurgery: why, when, how? Childs Nerv Syst. 2002;18:264–87.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kothbauer KF, Novak K. Intraoperative monitoring for tethered cord surgery: an update. Neurosurg Focus. 2004;16(2):1–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Krassioukov AV, Sarjeant R, Arkia H, Fehlings MG. Multimodality intraoperative monitoring during complex lumbosacral procedures: indications, techniques, and long-term follow-up review of 61 consecutive cases. J Neurosurg Spine. 2004;3:243–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Gunnarsson T, Krassioukov AV, Sarjeant R, Fehlings MG. Real-time continuous intraoperative electromyographic and somatosensory evoked potential recordings in spinal surgery: correlation of clinical and electrophysiologic findings in a prospective, consecutive series of 213 cases. Spine. 2004;29(6):677–84.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    *Paradiso G, Lee GY, Sargeant R, et al. Multimodality intraoperative neurophysiologic monitoring findings during surgery for adult tethered cord syndrome: analysis of a series of 44 patients with long-term follow-up. Spine. 2006;31(18):2095–102.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    *Khealani B, Husain AM. Neurophysiologic intraoperative monitoring during surgery for tethered cord syndrome. J Clin Neurophysiol. 2009;26(2):76–81.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kothbauer KF, Deletis V. Intraoperative neurophysiology of the conus medullaris and cauda equina. Childs Nerv Syst. 2010;26:247–53.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    *Sala F, Squintani G, Tamontano V, Arcaro C, Faccioli F, Mazza C. Intraoperative neurophysiology in tethered cord surgery: techniques and results. Childs Nerv Syst. 2013;29:1611–24.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    *Sala F, Tramontano V, Squintani G, Arcaro C, Tot E, Pinna G, Meglio M. Neurophysiology of complex spinal cord untethering. J Clin Neurophysiol. 2014;31:326–36.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Valentini L, Selvaggio G, Erbetta A, et al. Occult spinal dysraphysm: lessons learned by retrospective analysis of 149 surgical cases about natural history, surgical indications, urodynamic testing and intraoperative neurophysiologic monitoring. Childs Nerv Syst. 2013;29:1657–69.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Beyazova M, Zinnuroglu M, Emmez H, Kaya K, Ozkose HZ, Baykaner MK, et al. Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring during surgery for tethered cord syndrome. Turk Neurosurg. 2010;20(4):480–4.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Sala F, Barone G, Tramontano V, Gallo P, Ghimenton C. Retained medullary cord confirmed by neurophysiological mapping. Childs Nerv Syst. 2014;30:1287–91.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Kothbauer K, Seiler RW. Tethered spinal cord syndrome in adults. Nervenarzt. 1997;68(4):285–91.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Pratheesh R, Babu KS, Rajshekhar V. Improvement in intraoperative transcranial electrical motor-evoked potentials in tethered cord surgery: an analysis of 45 cases. Acta Neurochir. 2014;156:723–31.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Quinones-Hinojosa A, Gadkary CA, Gulati M, von Koch CS, Lyon R, Weinstein PR, Yingling CD. Neurophysiological monitoring for safe surgical tethered cord syndrome release in adults. Surg Neurol. 2004;62:127–35.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Husain AM, Shah D. Prognostic value of neurophysiologic intraoperative monitoring in tethered cord syndrome surgery. J Clin Neurophysiol. 2009;26:244–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Shinomiya K, Fuchioka M, Matsuoka T, Okamoto A, Yoshida H, Mutoh N, et al. Intraoperative monitoring for tethered spinal cord syndrome. Spine. 1991;16(11):1290–4.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Schaan M, Boszczyk B, Jaksche H, Kramer G, Günther M, Stöhrer M. Intraoperative urodynamics in spinal cord surgery: a study of feasibility. Eur Spine J. 2004;13:39–43.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of AnesthesiologyUniversity of Colorado School of MedicineAuroraUSA

Personalised recommendations