Advertisement

Affective Touch and Low Power Artificial Muscles for Rehabilitative and Assistive Wearable Soft Robotics

  • Jonathan Rossiter
  • Espen Knoop
  • Yuichi Nakamura
Conference paper
Part of the Biosystems & Biorobotics book series (BIOSYSROB, volume 16)

Abstract

The goal in wearable rehabilitation is to restore the lost functionality of the body by rebuilding the sensory-motor link. This may be achieved through a replication, in an artificial or robotic system, of the physiotherapy methods employed by human experts. These methods are typically focused on physical manipulation. We suggest that a lower reliance on manipulation, combined with affective touch stimulation, has the potential to provide effective rehabilitation in lower power and lighter wearable devices. Here we consider affective touch driven by soft actuation and how this may be combined with low power artificial muscle actuators for physical rehabilitation.

Keywords

Tactile Stimulator Wearable Device Dielectric Elastomer Artificial Muscle Alloy Filament 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    Delph II, M.A., Fischer, S.A., Gauthier, P.W., Martinez Luna, C.H., Clancy, E.A., Fischer, G.S.: A soft robotic exomusculature glove with integrated sEMG sensing for hand rehabilitation. In: Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics (ICORR), Seattle, WA (2013)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kawamoto, H., Kamibayashi, K., Nakata, Y., Yamawaki, K., Ariyasu, R., Sankai, Y., Sakane, M., Eguchi, K., Ochiai, N.: Pilot study of locomotion improvement using hybrid assistive limb in chronic stroke patients. BMC Neurol. 13, 141 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Polygerinos, P., Wang, Z., Galloway, K.C., Wood, R.J., Walsh, C.J.: Soft robotic glove for combined assistance and at-home rehabilitation. Robot. Auton. Syst. 73, 135–143 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Oguntosin, V., Harwin, W.S., Kawamura, S., Nasuto, S., Hayashi, Y.: Development of a wearable assistive soft robotic device for elbow rehabilitation. In: Proceedings of the 2015 ICORR 11th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics, Singapore (2015)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Roffman, C.E., Buchanan, J., Allison, G.T.: Predictors of non-use of prostheses by people with lower limb amputation after discharge from rehabilitation: development and validation of clinical prediction rules. J. Physiotherapy 60(4), 224–231 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Essick, G.K., McGlone, F., Dancer, C., Fabricant, D., Ragin, Y., Phillips, N., Jones, T., Guest, S.: Quantitative assessment of pleasant touch. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 34(2), 192–203 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Knoop, E., Rossiter, J.: The tickler: a compliant wearable tactile display for stroking and tickling. In: Proceedings of the CHI (2015)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Knoop, E., Rossiter, J.: A compliant soft-actuator laterotactile display. Smart Mater. Struct. 24, 045034 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jonathan Rossiter
    • 1
  • Espen Knoop
    • 1
  • Yuichi Nakamura
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Engineering MathematicsUniversity of BristolBristolUK
  2. 2.Academic Center for Computing and Media Studies, Graduate School of Electrical Engineering, Faculty of EngineeringKyoto UniversityKyotoJapan

Personalised recommendations