The Social Life of Political Institutions Among the Nunavik Inuit (Arctic Québec, Canada)

Chapter
First Online:
Part of the Springer Polar Sciences book series (SPPS)

Abstract

This chapter proposes to analyze the nature of the relationship between Inuit of Nunavik (arctic Québec, Canada) and the political organizations that rule their collective lives. It intends to examine what role and place people assign to these organizations in the context of self-governance in Nunavik. Using a relational approach, in order to take into account the singular ontology reflected in Inuit discourses and practices, this chapter shows that Nunavik Inuit do not see themselves separated from political institutions, but rather in a continuous relationship with them. Their attempt to achieve political autonomy in the region is not designed to attain complete separation with the Canadian federal government and with the Québec provincial government, but to establish a new relationship with them, where they would be recognized as equal partners. This chapter is based on long-term fieldwork in Nunavik communities and on research in governmental archives, which aimed to analyze power relationships among Inuit in Nunavik. It reveals that the relationships between people and the political entities are structured in the same way as their interpersonal relationships. Nunavik Inuit endowed their political institutions with agency and assigned them a specific place in their web of life.

Keywords

Self-governance Political institutions Relational perspective Ontology Nunavik 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Notes

Acknowledgements

I want to thank the several organizations which financially supported my doctoral research: Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada (SSRHC), Institut Polaire Français Paul-Émile Victor (France), SSRHC CURA Inuit Leadership and Governance in Nunavut and Nunavik, Consulat Général de France à Québec, the Ministère Québécois des Relations Internationales, the Faculty of Social Sciences and the Department of Anthropology of Université Laval, and the Northern Scientific Training Program (Canada). I also want to thank the National Science Foundation for its financial support for my participation in ICASS 2014 in Prince George, Canada.

References

  1. Adler, A. (1982). La mort est le masque du roi: La royauté sacrée des Moundang du Tchad. Paris: Payot.Google Scholar
  2. Anon. (1984). General conclusions based on information from the Task Force’s consultation trip, Taqralik, May: 21. Retrieved from http://collections.banq.qc.ca/ark:/52327/2165381
  3. Balandier, G. (1967). Anthropologie politique. Paris: Presses universitaires françaises.Google Scholar
  4. BANQ [Bibliothèque et Archives nationales du Québec], Compte-rendu de la reunion des agents de la DGNQ (21–23 mars 1967), Minutes of a meeting between community council members and Gilles Massé (18 février 1971). Serie E78, S30.Google Scholar
  5. Blaser, M., De Costa, R., McGregor, D., & Coleman, W. D. (2010). Reconfiguring the web of life: Indigenous peoples, relationality, and globalization. In M. Blaser et al. (Eds.), Indigenous peoples and autonomy. Insights for a global Age (pp. 3–26). Vancouver: UBC Press.Google Scholar
  6. Briggs, J. (2000). Conflict management in a modern Inuit community. In P. P. Schweitzer et al. (Eds.), Hunters and gatherers in the modern world: Conflict, resistance and self-determination (pp. 110–124). New York: Berghahn Books.Google Scholar
  7. Damas, D. (1963). Igluligmiut kinship and local groupings: A structural approach. Ottawa: Department of Northern Affairs and National Resources.Google Scholar
  8. De La Cadena, M. (2010). Indigenous cosmopolitics in the Andes: Conceptual reflections beyond “politics”. Cultural Anthropology, 25(2), 334–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Descola, P. (2014). Modes of being and forms of predication. HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory, 4(1), 271–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dorais, L.J. (2001). Maqainniq et kiinaujaliurutiit. Un village inuit dans le Québec d’aujourd’hui, Globe : Revue internationale d’études québécoises, 4(1), 53–70.Google Scholar
  11. Duhaime, G. (1992). Le chasseur et le minotaure : itinéraire de l’autonomie politique au Nunavik. Études/Inuit/Studies, 16(1–2), 149–177.Google Scholar
  12. Dupré, F. (2014). La fabrique des parentés. Enjeux électifs, pratiques relationnelles et productions symboliques chez les Inuit des Îles Belcher (Nunavut, Arctique canadien). Dissertation, Université Laval.Google Scholar
  13. Filotas, G. (1984). Impressions from the Arbvitarneq. Manuscript, Retrieved from http://www.makivik.org/fr/public-documents/
  14. Hervé, C. (2010). Analyse de la position sociale du chercheur : des obstacles sur le terrain à l’anthropologie reflexive. Les Cahiers du CIÉRA, 6, 7–26.Google Scholar
  15. Hervé, C. (2013). “On ne fait que s’entraider.” Dynamiques des relations de pouvoir et construction de la figure du leader chez les Inuit du Nunavik (XXe siècle-2011). PhD dissertation, Université Laval.Google Scholar
  16. Ingold, T. (1986). Comment. In A. Béteille et al. Individualism and equality [and comments and replies]. Current Anthropology, 27(2), 129–130.Google Scholar
  17. Ingold, T. (2006). Rethinking the animate, reanimating thought. Ethnos: Journal of Anthropology, 71(1), 9–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Koperqualuk, L. (2011). Puvirnitumiut religious and political dynamics. Master’s Thesis, Université Laval.Google Scholar
  19. Latour, B. (1991). Nous n’avons jamais été modernes. Paris: La Découverte.Google Scholar
  20. Laugrand, F. (2013). Les Inuit face aux changements climatiques et environnementaux. Communication, 31(2). Retrieved January 23, 2015, from http://communication.revues.org/4458; doi: 10.4000/communication.4458
  21. Laugrand, F., & Oosten, J. (2009). Inuit shamanism and Christianity in the Canadian Arctic. Transitions and transformations. Montréal/Kingston: McGill-Queens University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Leservoisier, O. (2005). Terrains ethnographiques et hiérarchise sociales. Retour réflexif sur la situation d’enquête. Paris: Karthala.Google Scholar
  23. Muller, J. C. (1980). Le roi bouc émissaire. Pouvoir et ritual chez les Rubuka du Nigeria central. Québec: Serge Fleury.Google Scholar
  24. NC. (2000). Hearing transcriptions of the Nunavik Commission. (A copy of the transcript can be consulted at Makivik Society, Quebec City.)Google Scholar
  25. NRC. (1970). Hearing transcriptions of the Neville Robitaille Commission. (A copy of the transcript can be consulted at Makivik Society, Quebec City.)Google Scholar
  26. Nunavik (2011, April 26). Nunavik and the Nunavik regional government. Facebook Group. Consulted on https://www.facebook.com/groups/189933581040333/?fref=ts
  27. Oosten, J., Laugrand, F., & Rasing, W. (2001). Interviewing Inuit elders. Perspectives on traditional law. Iqaluit: Nunavut Arctic College.Google Scholar
  28. Oullette, N. (2000). Tuurngait et chamanes inuit dans le Nunavik occidental contemporain. Master, Université Laval.Google Scholar
  29. Pernet, F. (2014). La construction de la personne au Nunavik. Ontologie, continuité culturelle, et rites de passage. Dissertation, Université Laval.Google Scholar
  30. Poirier, S. (2008). Reflections on indigenous cosmopolitics–poetics. Anthropologica, 50, 75–85.Google Scholar
  31. Qumaq, T. (1991). Inuit Uqausillaringit. Ulirnaisigutiit.. Québec: Association Inuksiutiit Katimajiit and Avataq Cultural Institute.Google Scholar
  32. Qumaq, T. (2010). Je veux que les Inuit soient libres de nouveau. Québec: Les Presses de l’Université du Québec.Google Scholar
  33. Rasing, W. (1994). ‘Too many people’: In Order and non-conformity in Iglulingmiut social process. Nijmegen: Katholieke Universiteit Faculteit der Rechtsgeleerdheid.Google Scholar
  34. Rodon, T., & Grey, M. (2009). The long and winding road to self-government: The Nunavik and Nunatsiavut experience. In F. Abele et al. (Ed.), Northern exposure: Peoples, powers, and prospects for Canada’s North (pp. 1–26). The art of the state, vol. 4. Montréal: Institute for Research in Public Policy.Google Scholar
  35. Rogers, S. (2011). Nunavik debates new government on Facebook. Nunatsiaq News, 8April. Retrievedfromhttp:// www. nunatsiaqonline. ca/ stories/ article/080411_nunavik_debates_ new_government_on_facebook/
  36. Rouland, N. (1979). Les modes juridiques de solution des conflits chez les Inuit. Études/Inuit/Studies, 3.Google Scholar
  37. Saladin d’Anglure B. (1967). L’organisation sociale traditionnelle des Esquimaux de Kangiqsujuaq (Nouveau-Québec). Dissertation, Université Laval.Google Scholar
  38. Schneider, L. (1985). Ulirnaisigutiit. An Inuktitut-English dictionnary of northern Quebec, Labrador and eastern arctic dialects. Québec: Presses de l’Université Laval.Google Scholar
  39. Simard, J.-J., & Duhaime, G. (1981). Praxis autochtone et stratégies techno-bureaucratiques. L’épisode de la consultation de l’hiver 1970 au Nouveau-Québec; ses tenants et ses aboutissants. Recherches amérindiennes au Québec, 9(2), 115–132.Google Scholar
  40. Stengers, I. (2010). Including nonhumans in political theory: Opening the Pandora’s box? In B. Braun & S. J. Whatmore (Eds.), Political matter: Technoscience, democracy, and public life (pp. 2–22). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  41. Therrien, M. (1997). Inuit concepts and notions regarding the Canadian justice system. In D. Brice-Bennett et al. (Eds.), Legal glossary/Glossaire juridique (pp. 250–275). Iqaluit: Nunavut Arctic College.Google Scholar
  42. Uitangak, J. (1994). Walk! Don’t walk! Squaring off the land of the Inuit. An essay on the historical and political developments of Nunavik. Manuscript.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Interuniversity Centre for Aboriginal Studies and ResearchQuébecCanada

Personalised recommendations