Blockchain Technology and Cryptocurrencies: Opportunities for Postal Financial Services

  • Christian Jaag
  • Christian Bach
Part of the Topics in Regulatory Economics and Policy book series (TREP)


This paper explores opportunities arising from blockchain technology for postal operators (POs). Blockchain technology has lately received a lot of interest by the media and the industry, especially in financial services. In the past years an entire ecosystem of new companies has developed, offering hundreds of different blockchain applications. Blockchains are a new kind of decentralized, secure and fast means of record-keeping. The first application of blockchain technology are cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin, which have become an alternative to commodity money and fiat money, but POs may be able to exploit this technology in a number of different ways.


Credit Card Financial Service Payment System Financial Intermediary Financial Inclusion 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Anson, J. (2014). Supporting transactions not pegged to national currencies: A role for the UPU. USPS OIG-UPU International Online Forum on Postal Innovation 2014.Google Scholar
  2. Anson, J., Berthaud, A., Klapper, L., & Singer, D. (2013). Financial inclusion and the role of the post office. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 6025.Google Scholar
  3. Bloomberg. (2014a). Bitcoin prices plunge on report PBOC orders accounts shut. Available at
  4. Bloomberg. (2014b). Mt. Gox Bitcoin exchange down amid $365 million theft claim. Available at
  5. Coindesk. (2014). Bitcoin vs Argentine Peso: Which is worse off? Available at
  6. EMarketer. (2013). B2C ecommerce climbs worldwide, as emerging markets drive sales higher. Available at
  7. Financial Crimes Enforcement Network. (2013). Application of FinCEN’s regulations to persons administering, exchanging, or using virtual currencies. Available at
  8. Financial Crimes Enforcement Network. (2014a). Application of FinCEN’s regulations to virtual currency mining operations. Available at
  9. Financial Crimes Enforcement Network. (2014b). Application of FinCEN’s regulations to virtual currency software development and certain investment activity. Available at
  10. Jaag, C., & Bach, C. (2013). Virtual currencies and physical posts: A perfect match. The Postal Industry, 1(2), 11–12.Google Scholar
  11. Jaag, C., & Bach, C. (2015). The effect of payment reversibility on E-commerce and postal quality (Chapter 6). In: Handbook of digital currency (Elsevier, Amsterdam).Google Scholar
  12. Jaag, C., & Haller, A. (2016). Economic mechanism design in Bitcoin: Mining, block formation and transaction fees. Swiss Economics Working Paper 57.Google Scholar
  13. Demirguc-Kunt, A., & Klapper, L. (2012). Measuring financial inclusion : The global findex database. Policy Research Working Paper No. 6025. Washington DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
  14. Lammer, T. (2014). Virtual currencies, payment systems & financial inclusion. USPS OIG-UPU International Online Forum on Postal Innovation 2014.Google Scholar
  15. Nasdaq. (2016). The halving: Then & now—A Bitcoin magazine infographic. Available at
  16. New York State Department of Financial Services, NYDFS. (2015, September 22). Press release—NYDFS announces approval of first BitLicense application from a virtual currency firm.Google Scholar
  17. The Economist. (2015, October 31). The trust machine.Google Scholar
  18. The Street. (2014). Three in four people have never heard of Bitcoin. Available at
  19. United States Postal Service, USPS. (2016). Blockchain technology: Possibilities for the U.S. Postal Service. RARC Report RARC-WP-16-011.Google Scholar
  20. Universal Postal Union. (2012). Annual report 2012. Available at
  21. Universal Postal Union. (2013). Global panorama on postal financial inclusion: Business models and key issues. Available at
  22. Universal Postal Union. (2014). Development of postal services in 2013. Available at
  23. Watkins, K., & Maria, Q. (2014). Lost in intermediation—How excessive charges undermine the benefits of remittances for Africa. Overseas Development Institute Report.Google Scholar
  24. World Bank. (2014). Migrants from developing countries to send home $414 billion in earnings in 2013. Available at

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Christian Jaag
    • 1
  • Christian Bach
    • 2
  1. 1.Swiss EconomicsZurichSwitzerland
  2. 2.University of Liverpool and Swiss EconomicsZurichSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations