End-to-End Encrypted Messaging Protocols: An Overview

  • Ksenia Ermoshina
  • Francesca Musiani
  • Harry Halpin
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 9934)

Abstract

This paper aims at giving an overview of the different core protocols used for decentralized chat and email-oriented services. This work is part of a survey of 30 projects focused on decentralized and/or end-to-end encrypted internet messaging, currently conducted in the early stages of the H2020 CAPS project NEXTLEAP.

Keywords

Decentralization End-to-end encryption Messaging Protocols NEXTLEAP  

References

  1. 1.
    Rogaway, P.: The moral character of cryptographic work. In: IACR Distinguished Lecture at Asiacrypt 2015 (2015). http://web.cs.ucdavis.edu/~rogaway/papers/moral.pdf
  2. 2.
    Unger, N., Dechand, S., Bonneau, J., Fahl, S., Perl, H., Goldberg, I., Smith, M.: SoK: secure messaging. In: 2015 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy, pp. 232–249. IEEE (2015)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Whitten, A., Tygar. J.D.: Why Johnny can’t encrypt: a usability evaluation of PGP 5.0. In: Proceedings of the 8th Conference on USENIX Security Symposium (SSYM 1999), vol. 8, p. 14. USENIX Association, Berkeley (1999)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Borisov, N., Goldberg, I., Brewer, E.: Off-the-record communication, or, why not to use PGP. In: Proceedings of the 2004 ACM Workshop on Privacy in the Electronic Society (2004). https://otr.cypherpunks.ca/otr-wpes.pdf, doi:10.1145/1029179.1029200
  5. 5.
    Prokop, A.: Solving the WebRTC interoperability problem. NoJitter (2015). http://www.nojitter.com/post/240169575/solving-the-webrtc-interoperability-problem
  6. 6.
    Weinberger, M.: Matrix wants to smash the walled gardens of messaging. ITworld, 16 September 2014. http://www.itworld.com/article/2694500/unified-communications/matrix-wants-to-smash-the-walled-gardens-of-messaging.html
  7. 7.
    Marlinspike, M.: Advanced cryptographic ratcheting. OpenWhisperSystems, 26 November 2013. https://whispersystems.org/blog/advanced-ratcheting/
  8. 8.
    Straub, A.: “OMEMO Encryption”, a protoXEP standards track proposed to XMPP, 25 October 2015. https://xmpp.org/extensions/inbox/omemo.html#intro-motivation
  9. 9.
    Méadel, C., Musiani, F. (coord.): Abécédaire des architectures distribuées, Presses des Mines. In: Musiani, F., Cogburn, D.L., DeNardis, L., Levinson, N.S. (dir.): The Turn to Infrastructure in Internet Governance. Palgrave Macmillan (2015)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ermoshina, K.: Democracy as pothole repair: civic applications and cyber-empowerment in Russia. Cyberpsychol. J. Psychosoc. Res. Cyberspace 8(3) (2014). Article no: 1, doi:10.5817/CP2014-3-4
  11. 11.
    Van den Hooff, L., et al.: Vuvuzela: scalable private messaging resistant to traffic analysis. In: Proceedings of SOSP 2015 (2015). http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2815400.2815417
  12. 12.
    Sanger, D., Perlroth, N.: Encrypted messaging apps face new scrutiny over possible role in Paris attacks. New York Times (2015). http://www.nytimes.com/2015/11/17/world/europe/encrypted-messaging-apps-face-new-scrutiny-over-possible-role-in-paris-attacks.html
  13. 13.
    Musiani, F., Cogburn, D.L., DeNardis, L., Levinson, N.S. (dir.): The Turn to Infrastructure in Internet Governance. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke (2016)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Agre, P.E.: P2P and the promise of internet equality. Commun. ACM 46(2), 39–42 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ksenia Ermoshina
    • 1
  • Francesca Musiani
    • 2
  • Harry Halpin
    • 3
  1. 1.i3-CSI, MINES ParisTechParisFrance
  2. 2.ISCC, CNRS/Paris-Sorbonne/UPMCParisFrance
  3. 3.INRIAParisFrance

Personalised recommendations