Conformity in Virtual Environments: A Hybrid Neurophysiological and Psychosocial Approach

  • Serena Coppolino Perfumi
  • Chiara Cardelli
  • Franco Bagnoli
  • Andrea Guazzini
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 9934)

Abstract

The main aim of our study was to analyze the effects of a virtual environment on social conformity, with particular attention to the effects of different types of task and psychological variables on social influence, on one side, and to the neural correlates related to conformity, measured by means of an Emotiv EPOC device on the other. For our purpose, we replicated the famous Asch’s visual task and created two new tasks of increasing ambiguity, assessed through the calculation of the item’s entropy. We also administered five scales in order to assess different psychological traits. From the experiment, conducted on 181 university students, emerged that conformity grows according to the ambiguity of the task, but normative influence is significantly weaker in virtual environments, if compared to face-to-face experiments. The analyzed psychological traits, however, result not to be relatable to conformity, and they only affect the subjects’ response times. From the ERP (Event-related potentials) analysis, we detected N200 and P300 components comparing the plots of conformist and non-conformist subjects, alongside with the detection of their Late Positive Potential, Readiness Potential, and Error-Related Negativity, which appear consistently different for the two typologies.

Keywords

Social conformity Social influence ERP Group pressure In-group dynamics 

References

  1. 1.
    Asch, S.E.: Effects of group pressure upon the modification and distortion of judgments. In: Guetzkow, H.S. (ed.) Groups, Leadership and Men, pp. 177–190. Carnegie Press, Pittsburgh (1951)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Morgan, T.J.H., Laland, K.N.: The biological bases of conformity. Front. Neurosci. 6(87), 1–7 (2012). doi:10.3389/fnins.2012.00087 Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Murray, D.R., Trudeau, R., Schaller, M.: On the origins of cultural differences in conformity: four tests of the pathogen prevalence hypothesis. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 37(3), 318–329 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Neuberg, S. L., Kenrick, D. T., Schaller, M.: Evolutionary Social Psychology. Handbook of Social Psychology (2010)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kiesler, S., Siegel, J., McGuire, T.W.: Social psychological aspects of computer-mediated communication. Am. Psychol. 39(10), 1123–1134 (1984)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Spears, R., Postmes, T., Lea, M., Wolbert, A.: When are net effects gross products? Commun. J. Soc. Issues 58(1), 91–107 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Laporte, L., van Nimwegen, C., Uyttendaele, A.J.: Do people say what they think: Social conformity behavior in varying degrees of online social presence. In: Proceedings of the 6th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Extending Boundaries, pp. 305–314. ACM, October 2010Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Deutsch, M., Gerard, H.B.: A study of normative and informational social influences upon individual judgment. J. Abnorm. Soc. Psychol. 51(3), 629–636 (1955)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Chen, J., Wu, Y., Tong, G., Guan, X., Zhou, X.: ERP correlates of social conformity in a line judgment task. BMC Neurosci. 13(1), 43–53 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kim, B.R., Liss, A., Rao, M., Singer, Z., Compton, R.J.: Social deviance activates the brain’s error-monitoring system. Cogn. Affect. Behav. Neurosci. 12(1), 65–73 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Shestakova, A., Rieskamp, J., Tugin, S., Ossadtchi, A., Krutitskaya, J., Klucharev, V.: Electrophysiological precursors of social conformity. Soc. Cogn. Affect. Neurosci. 8(7), 756–763 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Rosander, M., Eriksson, O.: Conformity on the internet-the role of task difficulty and gender differences. Comput. Hum. Behav. 28(5), 1587–1595 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Dennis, T.A., Hajcak, G.: The late positive potential: a neurophysiological marker for emotion regulation in children. J. Child Psychol. Psychiatry 50(11), 1373–1383 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Libet, B., Gleason, C.A., Wright, E.W., Pearl, D.K.: Time of conscious intention to act in relation to onset of cerebral activity (readiness-potential). Brain 106(3), 623–642 (1983)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Klein, T.A., Endrass, T., Kathmann, N., Neumann, J., von Cramon, D.Y., Ullsperger, M.: Neural correlates of error awareness. Neuroimage 34(4), 1774–1781 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Giannini, M., Pannocchia, L., Lauro-Grotto, R., Gori, A. (n.d.): A measure for counseling: the five factor adjective short test (5-fast). Unpublished manuscript, Department of Psychology, University of Florence, Florence, ItalyGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Spielberger, C.D., Gorsuch, R.L.: State-Trait Anxiety Inventory for Adults: Sampler Set: Manual, Tekst Booklet and Scoring Key. Consulting Psychologists Press, Palo Alto (1983)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Prezza, M., Pacilli, M.G., Barbaranelli, C., Zampatti, E.: The MTSOCS: A multidimensional sense of community scale for local communities. J. Community Psychol. 37(3), 305–326 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Rosenberg, M.: Conceiving the self. In: Ciarrochi, J., Bilich, L.: Acceptance and Commitment Therapy. Measures Package. University of Wollongong, Wollongong, Australia (2007). (Unpublished manuscript)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Sibilia, L., Schwarzer, R., Jerusalem, M.: Italian adaptation of the general self-efficacy scale. Resource document. Ralf Schwarzer web site (1995)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Crutchfield, R.S.: Conformity and character. Am. Psychol. 10(5), 191 (1955)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Serena Coppolino Perfumi
    • 1
  • Chiara Cardelli
    • 1
  • Franco Bagnoli
    • 3
    • 4
  • Andrea Guazzini
    • 2
    • 3
  1. 1.Neurofarba Department (Neuroscience, Psychology, Pharmacology and Children’s Health)University of FlorenceFlorenceItaly
  2. 2.Department of Educational Sciences and PsychologyUniversity of FlorenceFlorenceItaly
  3. 3.Centre for the Study of Complex DynamicsUniversity of FlorenceFlorenceItaly
  4. 4.Department of Physics and AstronomyUniversity of Florence INFNFlorenceItaly

Personalised recommendations