Habit in Semiosis: Two Different Perspectives Based on Hierarchical Multi-level System Modeling and Niche Construction Theory
Habit in semiosis can be modeled both as a macro-level in a hierarchical multi-level system where it functions as boundary conditions for emergence of semiosis, and as a cognitive niche produced by an ecologically-inherited environment of cognitive artifacts. According to the first perspective, semiosis is modeled in terms of a multilayered system, with micro functional entities at the lower-level and with higher-level processes being mereologically composed of these lower-level entities. According to the second perspective, habits are embedded in ecologically-inherited environments of signs that co-evolve with cognition. Both descriptions offer a novel approximation of Peirce’s semiotics and theoretical findings in other areas (hierarchy theory, evolutionary biology), suggesting new frameworks to approach the concept of habit integrated with its role in semiosis.
KeywordsSemiosis Hierarchical multi-level system Niche construction Peirce
P.A. acknowledges the financial support of CAPES Foundation, Ministry of Education of Brazil, Brasília—DF 70040-020, Brazil.
- Atã, Pedro, and João Queiroz. 2014. Icon and abduction: Situatedness in Peircean cognitive semiotics. Model-Based Reasoning in Science and Technology, ed. L. Magnani, 301–313. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.Google Scholar
- Atkin, Albert. 2016. Peirce. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Bickhard, Mark H. 2011. Some consequences (and enablings) of process metaphysics. Axiomathes 21(1): 3–32, 301–313.Google Scholar
- Bergman, Mats. 2000. Reflections on the role of the communicative sign in semeiotic. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society: A Quarterly Journal in American Philosophy 36(2): 225–254.Google Scholar
- Clark, Andy. 1998. Being there: Putting brain, body, and world together again. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- De Tienne, André. 2003. Learning qua semiosis. Semiotics, Evolution, Energy, and Development Journal 3: 37–53.Google Scholar
- Hoffmeyer, Jesper. 2008. The semiotic niche. Journal of Mediterranean Ecology 9: 5–30.Google Scholar
- Houser, Nathan. 1997. Introduction: Peirce as a logician. Studies in the logic of Charles Sanders Peirce, eds. Nathan Houser, D. Roberts, and J. Van Evra, 1–22. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
- Hutchins, Edwin. 1995. Cognition in the wild. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Hutchins, Edwin. 1999. Cognitive artifacts. In The MIT encyclopedia of the cognitive sciences, eds. R.A. Wilson, and F.C. Keil, 126–127. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Hulswit, Menno. 2001. Semeiotic and the cement of the universe: A Peircean process approach to causation. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society: A Quarterly Journal in American Philosophy 37(3): 339–363.Google Scholar
- Merrell, Floyd. 1995. Peirce’s semiotics now. Toronto: Canadian Scholar’s Press.Google Scholar
- Murphey, Murray G. 1993. The development of Peirce’s philosophy. Indianapolis: Hackett.Google Scholar
- Odling-Smee, John, Kevin N. Laland, and Marcus W. Feldman. 2003. Niche construction: The neglected process in evolution. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
- Parker, Kelly. 1998. The continuity of Peirce’s thought. Nashville: Vanderbilt University Press.Google Scholar
- Peirce, Charles Sanders. i. 1867–1913. Collected papers of Charles Sanders Peirce. Vols. 1–6, eds. Charles Hartshorne, and Paul Weiss. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1931–1935. Vols. 7–8, ed. Arthur W. Burks. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1958. [References to Peirce’s papers will be designated by CP, followed by volume, period, paragraph number.].Google Scholar
- Peirce, Charles Sanders. i. 1867–1893. The essential Peirce: Selected philosophical writing. Vol 1, eds. Nathan Houser, and Christian Kloesel. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1992. [References to this volume will be designated by EP 1, followed by colon, page number.].Google Scholar
- Peirce, Charles Sanders. i. 1893–1913. The essential Peirce: Selected philosophical writing. Vol 2, ed. the Peirce Edition Project. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1998. [References to this volume will be designated by EP 2, followed by colon, page number.].Google Scholar
- Peirce manuscripts in Texas Tech University Library at Texas Tech University, Institute of Studies of Pragmaticism, beginning with MS—or L for letter—and followed by a number, refer to the system of identification established by Richard R. Robin in Annotated Catalogue of the Papers of Charles S. Peirce (Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press, 1967), or in Richard R. Robin, “The Peirce Papers: A Supplementary Catalogue,” Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society.Google Scholar
- Queiroz, João, and Charbel El-Hani. 2006a. Semiosis as an emergent process. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society: A Quarterly Journal in American Philosophy 42(1): 78–116.Google Scholar
- Queiroz, João, and Charbel El-Hani. 2012. Downward determination in semiotic multi-level systems. Cybernetics and Human Knowing—A Journal of Second Order Cybernetics, Autopoiesis, and Semiotics 19: 123–136.Google Scholar
- Rescher, Nicholas. 1996. Process metaphysics: An introduction to process philosophy. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
- Robinson, Howard. 2014. Substance. The stanford encyclopedia of philosophy, Edward N. Zalta, ed. http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2012/entries/davidson/.
- Salthe, Stanley N. 1985. Evolving hierarchical systems: Their structure and representation. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
- Savan, David. 1986. Response to T.L.Short. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society: A Quarterly Journal in American Philosophy 22(2): 125–143.Google Scholar
- Seibt, Johanna. 2016. Process philosophy. The stanford encyclopedia of philosophy, Edward N. Zalta, ed. http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2012/entries/davidson/.
- Stjernfelt, Frederik. 2007. Diagrammatology—An investigation on the borderlines of phenomenology, ontology, and semiotics. Heidelberg: Springer.Google Scholar