Advertisement

Habit in Semiosis: Two Different Perspectives Based on Hierarchical Multi-level System Modeling and Niche Construction Theory

  • Pedro Atã
  • João Queiroz
Chapter
Part of the Studies in Applied Philosophy, Epistemology and Rational Ethics book series (SAPERE, volume 31)

Abstract

Habit in semiosis can be modeled both as a macro-level in a hierarchical multi-level system where it functions as boundary conditions for emergence of semiosis, and as a cognitive niche produced by an ecologically-inherited environment of cognitive artifacts. According to the first perspective, semiosis is modeled in terms of a multilayered system, with micro functional entities at the lower-level and with higher-level processes being mereologically composed of these lower-level entities. According to the second perspective, habits are embedded in ecologically-inherited environments of signs that co-evolve with cognition. Both descriptions offer a novel approximation of Peirce’s semiotics and theoretical findings in other areas (hierarchy theory, evolutionary biology), suggesting new frameworks to approach the concept of habit integrated with its role in semiosis.

Keywords

Semiosis Hierarchical multi-level system Niche construction Peirce 

Notes

Acknowledgments

P.A. acknowledges the financial support of CAPES Foundation, Ministry of Education of Brazil, Brasília—DF 70040-020, Brazil.

References

  1. Atã, Pedro, and João Queiroz. 2014. Icon and abduction: Situatedness in Peircean cognitive semiotics. Model-Based Reasoning in Science and Technology, ed. L. Magnani, 301–313. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.Google Scholar
  2. Atkin, Albert. 2016. Peirce. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  3. Bickhard, Mark H. 2011. Some consequences (and enablings) of process metaphysics. Axiomathes 21(1): 3–32, 301–313.Google Scholar
  4. Bergman, Mats. 2000. Reflections on the role of the communicative sign in semeiotic. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society: A Quarterly Journal in American Philosophy 36(2): 225–254.Google Scholar
  5. Bergman, Mats. 2005. C.S. Peirce’s dialogical conception of sign processes. Studies in Philosophy and Education 24(3–4): 213–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Clark, Andy. 1998[1997]. Being there: Putting brain, body, and world together again. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  7. Clark, Andy. 2006. Language, embodiment, and the cognitive niche. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 10(8): 370–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Clark, Andy. 2008. Supersizing the mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Clark, Andy, and David Chalmers. 1998. The extended mind. Analysis 58: 7–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. De Tienne, André. 2003. Learning qua semiosis. Semiotics, Evolution, Energy, and Development Journal 3: 37–53.Google Scholar
  11. Hoffmeyer, Jesper. 2008. The semiotic niche. Journal of Mediterranean Ecology 9: 5–30.Google Scholar
  12. Houser, Nathan. 1997. Introduction: Peirce as a logician. Studies in the logic of Charles Sanders Peirce, eds. Nathan Houser, D. Roberts, and J. Van Evra, 1–22. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Hutchins, Edwin. 1995. Cognition in the wild. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  14. Hutchins, Edwin. 1999. Cognitive artifacts. In The MIT encyclopedia of the cognitive sciences, eds. R.A. Wilson, and F.C. Keil, 126–127. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  15. Hulswit, Menno. 2001. Semeiotic and the cement of the universe: A Peircean process approach to causation. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society: A Quarterly Journal in American Philosophy 37(3): 339–363.Google Scholar
  16. Jones, Clive, John Lawton, and Moshe Shachak. 1994. Organisms as ecosystem engineers. Oikos 69: 373–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Laland, Kevin N., and Michael J. O’Brien. 2011. Cultural niche construction: An introduction. Biological Theory 6: 191–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Merrell, Floyd. 1995. Peirce’s semiotics now. Toronto: Canadian Scholar’s Press.Google Scholar
  19. Murphey, Murray G. 1993. The development of Peirce’s philosophy. Indianapolis: Hackett.Google Scholar
  20. Odling-Smee, John, Kevin N. Laland, and Marcus W. Feldman. 2003. Niche construction: The neglected process in evolution. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Parker, Kelly. 1998. The continuity of Peirce’s thought. Nashville: Vanderbilt University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Peirce, Charles Sanders. i. 1867–1913. Collected papers of Charles Sanders Peirce. Vols. 1–6, eds. Charles Hartshorne, and Paul Weiss. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1931–1935. Vols. 7–8, ed. Arthur W. Burks. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1958. [References to Peirce’s papers will be designated by CP, followed by volume, period, paragraph number.].Google Scholar
  23. Peirce, Charles Sanders. i. 1867–1893. The essential Peirce: Selected philosophical writing. Vol 1, eds. Nathan Houser, and Christian Kloesel. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1992. [References to this volume will be designated by EP 1, followed by colon, page number.].Google Scholar
  24. Peirce, Charles Sanders. i. 1893–1913. The essential Peirce: Selected philosophical writing. Vol 2, ed. the Peirce Edition Project. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1998. [References to this volume will be designated by EP 2, followed by colon, page number.].Google Scholar
  25. Peirce manuscripts in Texas Tech University Library at Texas Tech University, Institute of Studies of Pragmaticism, beginning with MS—or L for letter—and followed by a number, refer to the system of identification established by Richard R. Robin in Annotated Catalogue of the Papers of Charles S. Peirce (Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press, 1967), or in Richard R. Robin, “The Peirce Papers: A Supplementary Catalogue,” Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society.Google Scholar
  26. Queiroz, João, and Charbel El-Hani. 2006a. Semiosis as an emergent process. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society: A Quarterly Journal in American Philosophy 42(1): 78–116.Google Scholar
  27. Queiroz, João, and Charbel El-Hani. 2006b. Towards a multi-level approach to the emergence of meaning in living systems. Acta Biotheoretica 54: 179–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Queiroz, João, and Charbel El-Hani. 2012. Downward determination in semiotic multi-level systems. Cybernetics and Human Knowing—A Journal of Second Order Cybernetics, Autopoiesis, and Semiotics 19: 123–136.Google Scholar
  29. Rescher, Nicholas. 1996. Process metaphysics: An introduction to process philosophy. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  30. Robinson, Howard. 2014. Substance. The stanford encyclopedia of philosophy, Edward N. Zalta, ed. http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2012/entries/davidson/.
  31. Salthe, Stanley N. 1985. Evolving hierarchical systems: Their structure and representation. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Savan, David. 1986. Response to T.L.Short. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society: A Quarterly Journal in American Philosophy 22(2): 125–143.Google Scholar
  33. Scott-Phillips, Thomas, Kevin N. Laland, David M. Shuker, Thomas E. Dickins, and Stuart A. West. 2013. The niche construction perspective: A critical appraisal. Evolution 68(5): 1231–1243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Seibt, Johanna. 2016. Process philosophy. The stanford encyclopedia of philosophy, Edward N. Zalta, ed. http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2012/entries/davidson/.
  35. Stjernfelt, Frederik. 2007. Diagrammatology—An investigation on the borderlines of phenomenology, ontology, and semiotics. Heidelberg: Springer.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Federal UniversityJuiz de ForaBrazil

Personalised recommendations