Thirdness as the Observer Observed: From Habit to Law by Way of Habitus

  • Göran SonessonEmail author
Part of the Studies in Applied Philosophy, Epistemology and Rational Ethics book series (SAPERE, volume 31)


In order to study the notion of habit as an instance of Thirdness in Peirce’s work, it is necessary to go back to the intuitions at the basis of Peirce’s categories, trying to spell out concretely, as I think this has not been done before, the meaning of the three categories. This involves entangling the notions of fallibilism and of the collaborative work of the community of scholars, which may not have been taken seriously by most scholars pursuing the Peircean tradition. It is suggested that Peirce’s phenomenology is a version of Husserl’s phenomenology imposing a lot of constraints on the variation in imagination. In order to make sense of habit as Thirdness, we have to extend Peircean phenomenology into Husserlean phenomenology, abandoning the language of degeneracy, which is not very enlightening. Important contributions to the study of habit has also been made by several sociologists and psychologists.


Phenomenology Phaneroscopy Thirdness Mediation Husserl 


  1. Caivano, J. L. 2015. Cognición y procesamiento semiósico de estimulos luminoses en varios órdenes del mundo cultural y natural. Lecture at the XIth conference of the International Association for Visual Semiotics, Liège, Belgium, 8–11 September 2015.Google Scholar
  2. Deely, John N. 2010. Semiotic animal: A postmodern definition of “human being” transcending patriarchy and feminism. South Bend, Indiana: St. Augustine’s Press.Google Scholar
  3. Dines Johansen, Jørgen. 1993. Dialogical semiosis. Blomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Hammad, M. 2002. The privatisation of space. Lund: Department of Theoretical and Applied Aesthetics, School of Architecture, Lund University.Google Scholar
  5. Husserl, E. 1913. Logische Untersuchungen. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer.Google Scholar
  6. Husserl, E. 1954. Husserliana: gesammelte Werke. Bd 6, Die Krisis der europäischen Wissenschaften und die transzendentale Phänomenologie : eine Einleitung in die phänomenologische Philosophie. Haag: Nijhoff.Google Scholar
  7. Mennell, S., and J. Goudsblom. 1998. Introduction. In On civilization, power, and knowledge: Selected writings, by Norbert Elias, ed. S. Mennell, and J. Goudsblom, 1–48. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  8. Moran, D. 2011. Edmund Husserl’s phenomenology of habituality and habitus. Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology 42(1): 53–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Mukařovský, J. 1978. Structure, sign, and function: Selected essays. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Parmentier, Richard J. 1985. Signs’ place in medias res: Peirce’s concept of semiotic mediation. In Semiotic mediation: Sociocultural and psychological perspectives, ed. E. Mertz, and R.J. Parmentier, 23–48. Orlando, Florida: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Peirce, Charles Sanders. i. 1867–1913. Collected papers of Charles Sanders Peirce. Vols. 1–6, eds. Charles Hartshorne and Paul Weiss. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1931–1935. Vols. 7–8, ed. Arthur W. Burks. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1958. [References to Peirce’s papers will be designated by CP, followed by volume, period, paragraph number.].Google Scholar
  12. Peirce, Charles Sanders. i. 1867–1893. The Essential Peirce: Selected Philosophical Writing. Volume 1 (1867–1893), eds. Nathan Houser and Christian Kloesel. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1992. [References to this volume will be designated by EP 1, followed by colon, page number.].Google Scholar
  13. Peirce, Charles Sanders. i. 1893–1913. The Essential Peirce: Selected Philosophical Writing. Volume 2 (1893–1913), ed. the Peirce Edition Project. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1998. [References to this volume will be designated by EP 2, followed by colon, page number.].Google Scholar
  14. Peirce manuscripts in Texas Tech University Library at Texas Tech University, Institute of Studies of Pragmaticism, beginning with MS—or L for letter—and followed by a number, refer to the system of identification established by Richard R. Robin in Annotated Catalogue of the Papers of Charles S. Peirce (Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press, 1967), or in Richard R. Robin, “The Peirce Papers: A Supplementary Catalogue,” Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society.Google Scholar
  15. Ransdell, Joseph. 1989. Peirce est-il un phénoménologue? Ètudes Phénoménologiques 9–10, 51 75.
  16. Rosch, E. 1975. Cognitive reference points. Cognitive Psychology 7(4): 532–547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Sonesson, G. 1989. Pictorial concepts. Inquiries into the semiotic heritage and its relevance for the analysis of the visual world. Lund, Sweden: Aris/Lund University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Sonesson, G. 1996. An essay concerning images. From rhetoric to semiotics by way of ecological physics. Semiotica 109.1/2 (March 1996): 41–140.Google Scholar
  19. Sonesson, G. 2001. The pencils of nature and culture. Semiotica 136.1/4: 27–53. —. 2006. The meaning of meaning in biology and cognitive science. A semiotic reconstruction. Sign Systems Studies 34.1: 135-214.Google Scholar
  20. Sonesson, G. 2009a. The view from Husserl’s lectern. Considerations on the role of phenomenology in Cognitive Semiotics. Cybernetics and Human Knowing 16.3–4: 107-148.Google Scholar
  21. Sonesson, G. 2009b. Prologomena to a general theory of iconicity. Considerations on language, gesture, and pictures. In Naturalness and iconicity in language, eds. K. Willems and L. De Cuypere, 47 72. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
  22. Sonesson, G. 2010. Semiosis and the elusive final interpretant of understanding. Semiotica 179.1/4: 145 258.Google Scholar
  23. Sonesson, G. 2013. The natural history of branching: Approaches to the phenomenology of firstness, secondness, and thirdness. Signs and Society 1.2: 297–326.Google Scholar
  24. Sonesson, G. 2015a. Le jeu de la valeur et du sens. In Dans Valeur. Aux fondements de la sémiotique, ed. Amir Biglari, 85–100. Paris: L’Harmattan.Google Scholar
  25. Sonesson, G. 2015b. Phenomenology meets semiotics: Two not so very strange bedfellows at the end of their cinderella sleep. Metodo 3.1: 41–62.Google Scholar
  26. Sonesson, G. (in press) Kognitiv Semiotik. Ett Program. Stockholm: Riksbankens Jubileumsfond.Google Scholar
  27. Steinbock, A. 1995. Home and Beyond: Generative Phenomenology after Husserl. Evanston, Illinois: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Stjernfelt, F. 2007. Diagrammatology: An investigation on the borderlines of phenomenology, ontology, and semiotics. Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Stjernfelt, F. 2014. Natural propositions. The Actuality of Peirce’ Doctrine of Dicisign. Boston: Docent Press.Google Scholar
  30. Thompson, E. 2007. Mind in life: Biology, phenomenology, and the sciences of mind. Cambridge: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Welton, D. 2000. The other husserl: The horizons of transcendental phenomenology. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  32. West, Donna E. 2013. Deictic imaginings: Semiosis at work and at play. Heidelberg: Springer.Google Scholar
  33. West, Donna E. 2014. From habit to habituescence: Peirce’s continuum of ideas. In Semiotics 2013, ed. Jamin Pelkey and Leonard G. Sbrocchi, 117–126. Ottawa: Legas Press.Google Scholar
  34. Zlatev, J. 2009. The semiotic hierarchy: Life, consciousness, signs, and language. Cognitive Semiotics 4: 169–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Lund UniversityLundSweden

Personalised recommendations