Advertisement

Analysis of the Effects of Storage Capabilities Integration on Balancing Mechanisms in Agent-Based Smart Grids

  • Serkan ÖzdemirEmail author
  • Rainer Unland
  • Wolfgang Ketter
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 9872)

Abstract

Due to new energy transition policies fossil- and partially also nuclear based power production has been replaced by usually much more volatile renewable energy production. Volatility here means that it is substantially more difficult to keep energy production and consumption in balance. Such a challenge can be tackled by seamlessly integrating modern power storage technologies, such as batteries. This paper focuses on the role of battery storage providers to reveal their profitability and balancing potentials from the perspective of all parties, involved in the balancing process. Batteries are managed by broker agents, which are analyzed in the PowerTAC marketplace simulation environment. We first describe the Vickrey–Clarke–Groves auction mechanism to demonstrate how its pricing mechanism provides incentives for participants. Afterwards, we analyze the trading behaviors of different balancing settings to benchmark profitability levels of battery storage providers. We employ a broker agent for each setting so that variants publish a battery storage tariff with different up-regulation and down-regulation prices. The results show that battery storage providers provide extra profit for brokers if exploited strategically in the balancing market. Additionally, they help stabilizing the grid with up and down regulations.

Keywords

Balancing market Regulation market Autonomous trading Agent 

References

  1. 1.
    Ketter, W., Collins, J., De Weerdt, M.: The 2016 power trading agent competition. ERIM Report Series Reference (2016) Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Morris, C., Pehnt, M.: Energy Transition: The German Energiewende. Heinrich Böll Stiftung, Berlin (2014)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Urieli, D., Stone, P.: Tactex’13: a champion adaptive power trading agent. In: Proceedings of the 2014 International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multi-agent Systems, pp. 1447–1448 (2014)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Reddy, P.P., Veloso, M.M.: Factored models for multiscale decision-making in smart grid customers. In: AAAI, July 2012Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Vickrey, W.: Counterspeculation, auctions, and competitive sealed tenders. J. Finan. 16(1), 8–37 (1961)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ansarin, M., Ketter, W., Collins, J.: Market-based multi-agent coordination to manage energy balance in smart grids. Available at SSRN (2016) Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Möller, C., Rachev, S.T., Fabozzi, F.J.: Balancing energy strategies in electricity portfolio management. Energy Econ. 33(1), 2–11 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ozdemir, S., Unland, R.: A winner agent in a smart grid simulation platform. In: 2015 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Intelligent Agent Technology (IAT 2015) (2015)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hollands, R.G.: Will the real smart city please stand up? Intelligent, progressive or entrepreneurial? City 12(3), 303–320 (2008)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    US Energy Information Administration: Annual Energy Review 2010, October 2011Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Babic, J., Podobnik, V.: An analysis of power trading agent competition 2014. In: Ceppi, S., David, E., Podobnik, V., Robu, V., Shehory, O., Stein, S., Vetsikas, I.A. (eds.) AMEC/TADA 2013 and 2014. LNBIP, vol. 187, pp. 1–15. Springer, Heidelberg (2014)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    RES EU: Directive 2009/28/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 April 2009 on the promotion of the use of energy from renewable sources and amending and subsequently repealing Directives 2001/77/EC and 2003/30. Off. J. Eur. Comm. 5, 16–62 (2009)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Vandezande, L., Meeus, L., Belmans, R., Saguan, M., Glachant, J.-M.: Well-functioning balancing markets: a prerequisite for wind power integration. Energy Policy 38(7), 3146–3154 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Vickrey, W.: Counterspeculation, auctions, and competitive sealed tenders. J. Finan. 16(1), 8–37 (1961)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Clarke, E.H.: Multipart pricing of public goods. Public Choice 11(1), 17–33 (1971)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Liefers, B., Hoogland, J., Poutré, H.L.: A successful broker agent for power TAC. In: Ceppi, S., David, E., Podobnik, V., Robu, V., Shehory, O., Stein, S., Vetsikas, I.A. (eds.) AMEC/TADA 2013 and 2014. LNBIP, vol. 187, pp. 99–113. Springer, Heidelberg (2014)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Matetic, S., Babic, J., Matijas, M., Petric, A., Podobnik, V.: The CrocodileAgent 2012: negotiating agreements in smart grid tariff market. In: AT, pp. 203–204 (2012)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ketter, W., Peters, M., Collins, J.: Autonomous agents in future energy markets: the 2012 power trading agent competition. In: Proceedings of the 25th Benelux Conference on Artificial Intelligence, BNAIC 2013, Delft, The Netherlands, 7–8 November 2013, Delft University of Technology (TU Delft). Under the Auspices of the Benelux Association for Artificial Intelligence (BNVKI) and the Dutch Research School for Information and Knowledge Systems (SIKS) (2013)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Urieli, D., Stone, P.: An MDP-based winning approach to autonomous power trading: formalization and empirical analysis. In: Workshops at the Thirtieth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (2016)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Joskow, P.L.: California’s electricity crisis. Oxford Rev. Econ. Policy 17(3), 365–388 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Derksen, C., Linnenberg, T., Unland, R., Fay, A.: Structure and classification of unified energy agents as a base for the systematic development of future energy grids. Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell. 41, 310–324 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kahlen, M., Ketter, W.: Aggregating electric cars to sustainable virtual power plants: the value of flexibility in future electricity markets. In: AAAI, pp. 665–671, January 2015Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Drury, E., Denholm, P., Sioshansi, R.: The value of compressed air energy storage in energy and reserve markets. Energy 36(8), 4959–4973 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Ramchurn, S.D., Vytelingum, P., Rogers, A., Jennings, N.: Agent-based control for decentralised demand side management in the smart grid. In: The 10th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, vol. 1, pp. 5–12. International Foundation for Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, May 2011Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Gordijn, J., Akkermans, H.: Business models for distributed generation in a liberalized market environment. Electric Power Syst. Res. 77(9), 1178–1188 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Albadi, M.H., El-Saadany, E.F.: Demand response in electricity markets: an overview. In: 2007 IEEE Power Engineering Society General Meeting, June 2007Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Vytelingum, P., Voice, T.D., Ramchurn, S.D., Rogers, A., Jennings, N.R.: Theoretical and practical foundations of large-scale agent-based micro-storage in the smart grid. J. Artif. Intell. Res. 42, 765–813 (2011)zbMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Serkan Özdemir
    • 1
    Email author
  • Rainer Unland
    • 1
  • Wolfgang Ketter
    • 2
  1. 1.DAWISUniversity of Duisburg-EssenEssenGermany
  2. 2.RSMErasmus University RotterdamRotterdamNetherlands

Personalised recommendations