Programming an Autonomous Mini-vehicle in Narrow Environments

  • Emanuel Giurgiu
  • Teodora Girbacia
  • Gheorghe Leonte Mogan
Conference paper

Abstract

In order for a mini-vehicle to accurately follow a trajectory with a constant velocity even while avoiding an obstacle, the transition between driving straight ahead and making a turn is realized by driving along a clothoid arc. In narrow environments the generated trajectory requires a higher number of maneuvers in order to avoid the obstacles placed in the environment. In this paper is presented the hardware structure of a mini-vehicle with two electric servomotors and an algorithm developed for achieving an autonomous mini-vehicle that allows to accurately establish the speed with which the car is going to travel, calculate the distances between specific points of the trajectory and the necessary time required to reach transitional or final targets.

Keywords

Autonomous vehicle Trajectory following Clothoid Narrow spaces 

References

  1. 1.
    Souissi, O., Benatitallah, R., Duvivier, D., Artiba, A., Belanger, N., Feyzeau, P.: Path planning: a 2013 survey. In: Proceedings of 2013 International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Systems Management, pp. 1–8 (2013)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Pérez, J., Godoy, J., Villagra, J., Onieva, E.: Trajectory generator for autonomous vehicles in urban environments. In: IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, pp. 409–414 (2013)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Muñoz, P., Barrero, D.F., R-Moreno, M.D.: A statistically rigorous analysis of 2D path-planning algorithms. Comput. J. 58(11), 2876–2891 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Liang, Z., Zheng, G., Li, J.: Automatic parking path optimization based on bezier curve fitting. In: IEEE International Conference on Automation and Logistics, pp. 583–587 (2012)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Gupta, A., Divekar, R., Agrawal, M.: Autonomous parallel parking system for Ackerman steering four wheelers. In: IEEE International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Computing Research, pp. 1–6 (2010)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Au, T.C., Fok, C.L., Vishwanath, S., Julien, C., Stone, P.: Evasion planning for autonomous vehicles at intersections. In: IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, pp. 1541–1546 (2012)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Guo, L., Ge, P.S., Yue, M., Zhao, Y.B.: Lane changing trajectory planning and tracking controller design for intelligent vehicle running on curved road. In: Mathematical Problems in Engineering, pp. 1–9 (2014)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Funke, J., Gerdes, J.C.: Simple clothoid lane change trajectories for automated vehicles incorporating friction constraints. J. Dyn. Syst. Meas. Control 138(2), 1–9 (2016)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Chu, K., Lee, M., Sunwoo, M.: Local path planning for off-road autonomous driving with avoidance of static obstacles. IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst. 13(4), 1599–1616 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gîrbacia, T., Margarit, A., Mădălin, S., Mogan, G.: Path and trajectory planning for vehicles with navigation assistants. In: Olaru, A. (ed.) Applied Mechanics and Materials, vol. 811, pp. 300–304. Trans Tech Publications, Zurich (2015)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Emanuel Giurgiu
    • 1
  • Teodora Girbacia
    • 1
  • Gheorghe Leonte Mogan
    • 1
  1. 1.Transilvania University of BraşovBraşovRomania

Personalised recommendations