Advertisement

Empirical Investigation of Partnership and Mediating Effect of Mode of Partnership on Innovation Outcome of IT Firms

  • Ashish Kumar JhaEmail author
  • Indranil Bose
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing book series (LNBIP, volume 258)

Abstract

Higher cooperation with various players is widely believed to be an important determinant of innovation productivity. The players include suppliers, clients, competitors, universities etc. However the importance of these probable partners and their differential impact on product innovation vis-à-vis process innovation is an issue which has not been explored in extant literature. Also another important consideration is whether having cooperation partners directly impacts the innovation productivity or the relationship is mediated by the choice of mode of partnership. While the extant literature has established inter-firm cooperation to be important for innovation at a generic level, we find that it is the dynamics of the partnership characterized by the cooperation partner and more importantly the mode of the partnership which determines the success of such a cooperative effort.

Keywords

Product innovation Process innovation Technological innovation in IT firms Inter-firm cooperation 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors like to thank the World Bank Enterprise survey for providing access to firm level micro data for this research to be completed (Enterprise Survey). The authors like to state that all inferences drawn in the paper and all views presented are authors’ own and are in no way representative of World Bank’s views or inferences.

References

  1. 1.
    Teece, J.D.: Competition, cooperation, and innovation: organizational arrangements for regimes of rapid technological progress. J. Econ. Behav. Organ. 18(1), 1–25 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hagedoorn, J.: Inter-firm R&D partnerships: an overview of major trends and patterns since 1960. Res. Policy 31(4), 477–492 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hagedoorn, J.: Understanding the rationale for strategic technology partnering: inter-organizational modes of cooperation and sectoral differences. Strateg. Manag. J. 14(5), 371–385 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Abramovsky, L., Kremp, E., López, A., Schmidt, T., Simpson, H.: Understanding co-operative innovative activity: evidence from four European countries. Econ. Innov. New Tech. 18(3), 243-265 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Sampson, R.: R&D Alliances and firm performance: the impact of technological diversity and alliance organization on innovation. Acad. Manage. J. 50(2), 364–386 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Belderbos, R., Carree, M., Lokshin, B.: Complementarity in R&D cooperation strategies. Rev. Ind. Organ. 28(4), 401–426 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Miotti, L., Sachwald, F.: Cooperative R&D: why and with whom? An integrated framework of analysis. Res. Policy 32(8), 1481–1499 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Baron, R.M., Kenny, D.A.: The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 51(6), 1173–1182 (1986)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Aggarwal, R., Singh, H.: Differential influence of blogs across different stages of decision making: the case of venture capitalists. MIS Quart. 37(4), 1093–1112 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    OECD: Proposed guidelines for collecting and interpreting technological innovation data. In: The Measurement of Scientific and Technological Activities: Oslo Manual. OECD Publishing (1997)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hansen, J.A.: Innovation, firm size, and firm age. Small Bus. Econ. 4(1), 37–44 (1992)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Stuart, T.E.: Interorganizational alliances and the performance of firms: a study of growth and innovation rates in a high-technology industry. Strateg. Manage. J. 21(8), 791–811 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Indian Institute of Management CalcuttaKolkataIndia

Personalised recommendations