Creating Realistic Synthetic Incident Data

Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing book series (LNBIP, volume 258)

Abstract

The utilisation of the full flexibility of on-demand IT service provisioning requires in-depth knowledge on service performance. Otherwise reduction in cost going along with an increase of availability cannot be achieved. Thus, IT service decision methods incorporating IT service incident data are required. However, a lot of these models cannot be evaluated in a satisfactory fashion due to the lack of real-world incident data. To address this problem, we identify the need for realistic synthetic incident data for IT services. We stipulate the composition of this incident data and proclaim a procedure enabling the creation of realistic synthetic incident data for IT services allowing for a thorough evaluation of any formal decision model that relies on these forms of data sources.

Keywords

On-demand services Cloud computing Simulation Evaluation Decision support 

References

  1. 1.
    Kirwan, B.: Human reliability assessment. Encyclopedia of Quantitative Risk Analysis and Assessment (2008)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Reason, J.: Human error: models and management. Bmj 320(7237), 768–770 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ayachitula, N., Buco, M., Diao, Y., Maheswaran, S., Pavuluri, R., Shwartz, L., Ward, C.: IT service management automation-a hybrid methodology to integrate and orchestrate collaborative human centric and automation centric workflows. In: IEEE International Conference on Services Computing, SCC 2007, pp. 574–581. IEEE (2007)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    AWS-Team: Summary of the Amazon EC2 and Amazon RDS Service Disruption in the US East Region (2011). http://aws.amazon.com/message/65648/. Accessed 09 Nov 2015
  5. 5.
    Franke, U., Holm, H., König, J.: The distribution of time to recovery of enterprise IT services. IEEE Trans. Reliab. 63(4), 858–867 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Franke, U.: Optimal IT service availability: shorter outages, or fewer? IEEE Trans. Netw. Serv. Manag. 9(1), 22–33 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kieninger, A., Straeten, D., Kimbrough, S.O., Schmitz, B., Satzger, G.: Leveraging service incident analytics to determine cost-optimal service offers. In: Wirtschaftsinformatik, 64 (2013)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kieninger, A., Berghoff, F., Fromm, H., Satzger, G.: Simulation-based quantification of business impacts caused by service incidents. In: Falcão e Cunha, J., Snene, M., Nóvoa, H. (eds.) IESS 2013. LNBIP, vol. 143, pp. 170–185. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Pinheiro, E., Weber, W.-D., Barroso, L.A.: Failure trends in a large disk drive population. In: FAST, vol. 7, pp. 17–23 (2007)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Andrieux, A., Czajkowski, K., Dan, A., Keahey, K., Ludwig, H., Nakata, T., Pruyne, J., Rofrano, J., Tuecke, S., Xu, M.: Web Services Agreement Specification (WS-Agreement). Open Grid Forum (OGF) Proposed Recommendation GFD.107 (2007)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Yeh, L.: The rate of occurrence of failures. J. Appl. Probab. 34(1), 234–247 (1997)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Harmon, R., Demirkan, H., Hefley, B., Auseklis, N.: Pricing strategies for information technology services: a value-based approach. In: 42nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, HICSS 2009, pp. 1–10. IEEE (2009)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kesidis, G., Das, A., de Veciana, G.: On flat-rate and usage-based pricing for tiered commodity internet services. In: 42nd Annual Conference on Information Sciences and Systems, CISS 2008, pp. 304–308, March 2008Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Moon, H.J., Chi, Y., Hacigumus, H.: SLA-aware profit optimization in cloud services via resource scheduling. In: 2010 6th World Congress on Services (SERVICES-1), pp. 152–153. IEEE (2010)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Buco, M.J., Chang, R.N., Luan, L.Z., Ward, C., Wolf, J.L., Yu, P.S.: Utility computing SLA management based upon business objectives. IBM Syst. J. 43(1), 159–178 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Elsayed, E.A.: Reliability Engineering, vol. 88. Wiley, Hoboken (2012)MATHGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kapur, K.C., Pecht, M.: Reliability Engineering. Wiley, Hoboken (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Roedder, N., Knapper, R., Martin, J.: Risk in modern IT service landscapes: towards a dynamic model. In: 2012 5th IEEE International Conference on Service-Oriented Computing and Applications (SOCA), pp. 1–4, December 2012Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Roedder, N., Karaenke, P., Knapper, R.: A Risk-aware decision model for service sourcing (Short Paper). In: 2013 IEEE 6th International Conference on Service-Oriented Computing and Applications (SOCA), pp. 135–139, December 2013Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Roedder, N. and Karaenke, P. and Knapper, R. and Weinhardt, C.: Decision-making based on incident data analysis. In: 2014 IEEE 16th Conference on Business Informatics (CBI), vol. 1, pp. 46–53, July 2014Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nico Roedder
    • 1
  • Paul Karaenke
    • 2
  • Christof Weinhardt
    • 3
  1. 1.Information Process EngineeringFZI Research Center for Information TechnologyKarlsruheGermany
  2. 2.Department of InformaticsTU MünchenGarchingGermany
  3. 3.Institute of Information Systems and Marketing, Karlsruhe Institute of TechnologyKarlsruheGermany

Personalised recommendations