A Proposal of Performance Indicators for Collaborative Business Ecosystems

Conference paper
Part of the IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology book series (IFIPAICT, volume 480)

Abstract

Business ecosystems enabled by the increasing use and improvement of communication networks, offer nowadays a powerful competitive advantage to business players and entrepreneurs. They form a collaborative new mean of economic and social value creation, addressing customers’ needs, overcoming constraints of individual firms, increasing capabilities for new business opportunities, and accelerating learning and innovation. This paper proposes a set of performance indicators to measure some of these collaboration benefits, therefore motivating the sustainability and resilience of the business ecosystem. The presented results are based on simulation models, which intend to characterize the roles and interactions of a real life collaborative business ecosystem.

Keywords

Collaborative network Business ecosystem Digital business ecosystem Performance indicators 

Notes

Acknowledgment

This work benefited from the ongoing research within the CoDIS (Collaborative Networks and Distributed Industrial Systems Group) which is part of both the New University of Lisbon (UNL) - Faculty of Sciences and Technology, and the UNINOVA - Institute for the Development of New Technologies. Partial support also comes from Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia through the PEST program UID/EEA/00066/2013.

References

  1. 1.
    Moore, J.F.: Predators and prey: a new ecology of competition. Harvard Bus. Rev. 71(3), 75–83 (1993)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Moore, J.F.: The Death of Competition: Leadership and Strategy in the Age of Business Ecosystems. HarperCollins Publishers, New York (1996)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kelly, E.: Introduction: Business Ecosystems Come of Age (2015)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Graça, P., Camarinha-Matos, L.M.: The need of performance indicators for collaborative business ecosystems. In: Camarinha-Matos, L.M., Baldissera, T.A., Di Orio, G., Marques, F. (eds.) DoCEIS 2015. IFIP AICT, vol. 450, pp. 22–30. Springer, Heidelberg (2015)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Camarinha-Matos, L.M., Afsarmanesh, H.: Collaborative networks: a new scientific discipline. J. Intell. Manuf. 16(4–5), 439–452 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Camarinha-Matos, L.M., Afsarmanesh, H.: Collaborative Networks: Reference Modeling. Springer Science & Business Media, Heidelberg (2008)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kaplan, R.S., Norton, D.P.: The Balanced Scorecard: Translating Strategy into Action. Harvard Business Press, Boston (1996)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Romero, D., Galeano, N., Molina, A.: A conceptual model for virtual breeding environments value systems. In: Camarinha-Matos, L.M., Afsarmanesh, H., Novais, P., Analide, C. (eds.) Establishing the Foundation of Collaborative Networks. IFIP, vol. 243, pp. 43–52. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Camarinha-Matos, L.M., Macedo, P.: A conceptual model of value systems in collaborative networks. J. Intell. Manuf. 21(3), 287–299 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Macedo, P., Camarinha-Matos, L.M.: A qualitative approach to assess the alignment of value systems in collaborative enterprises networks. Comput. Ind. Eng. 64(1), 412–424 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Abreu, A., Camarinha-Matos, L.M.: A benefit analysis model for collaborative networks. In: Camarinha-Matos, L.M., Afsarmanesh, H. (eds.) Collaborative Networks: Reference Modeling, pp. 253–276. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Gopal, P.R.C., Thakkar, J.: A review on supply chain performance measures and metrics: 2000-2011. Int. J. Prod. Perform. Manag. 61(5), 518–547 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ramanathan, U.: Performance of supply chain collaboration–a simulation study. Expert Syst. Appl. 41(1), 210–220 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Abreu, A., Camarinha-Matos, L.M.: An approach to measure social capital in collaborative networks. In: Camarinha-Matos, L.M., Pereira-Klen, A., Afsarmanesh, H. (eds.) PRO-VE 2011. IFIP AICT, vol. 362, pp. 29–40. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Battistella, C., Colucci, K., De Toni, A.F., Nonino, F.: Methodology of business ecosystems network analysis: a case study in Telecom Italia Future Centre. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 80(6), 1194–1210 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Allee, V.: Value Networks and the True Nature of Collaboration. Digital edn. ValueNet Works and Verna Allee Associates, Tampa (2011)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Fiksel, J.: Sustainability and resilience: toward a systems approach. Sustain. Sci. Pract. Policy 2(2), 14–21 (2006)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Fiksel, J.: Designing resilient, sustainable systems. Environ. Sci. Technol. 37(23), 5330–5339 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Freeman, L.C.: Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification. Soc. Netw. 1(3), 215–239 (1978)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Myers, J.L., Well, A., Lorch, R.F.: Research Design and Statistical Analysis. Routledge, New York (2010)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Multimethod Simulation Software and Solutions. http://www.anylogic.com/. Accessed 12 May 2016
  22. 22.
    Sterman, J.D.: Business Dynamics: Systems Thinking and Modeling for a Complex World, vol. 19. Irwin/McGraw-Hill, Boston (2000)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© IFIP International Federation for Information Processing 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculdade de Ciências e Tecnologia and Uninova CTSUniversidade Nova de LisboaCaparicaPortugal
  2. 2.Instituto Superior de Engenharia de Lisboa, Instituto Politécnico de LisboaLisbonPortugal

Personalised recommendations