Juvenile Angiofibroma pp 213-223 | Cite as
Combined Neurosurgical and Craniofacial Approach for Large Intracranial Tumor
Abstract
Craniofacial approaches may still be necessary, especially in those cases with significant intracranial tumor burden, those with intimate tumor association with the internal carotid artery (ICA), and those where the tumor has a significant extension laterally to the carotid artery. Complications including cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leakage may necessitate reoperation or cerebrospinal fluid diversion. Meticulous closure using vascularized flaps minimizes the incidence of such complications. Given the proximity of the pathology to the intracranial circulation, the surgical team must be prepared for and able to perform standard revascularization procedures in the setting of inadvertent injury to these vessels. In this chapter, the craniofacial approach to juvenile angiofibromas is discussed along with outcomes in a cohort of patients treated using this strategy.
Keywords
Craniofacial approach Juvenile angiofibroma MicrosurgeryReferences
- 1.Rogers DJ, Bevans SE, Harsha WJ. Endoscopic resection of juvenile nasopharyngeal angiofibroma. Adv Otorhinolaryngol. 2012;73:132–6.Google Scholar
- 2.Leong SC. A systematic review of surgical outcomes for advanced juvenile nasopharyngeal angiofibroma with intracranial involvement. Laryngoscope. 2013;123:1125–31.Google Scholar
- 3.Kalani MY, Kalani MA, Kalb S, Albuquerque FC, McDougall CG, Nakaji P, et al. Craniofacial approaches to large juvenile angiofibromas. J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2011;8:71–8.Google Scholar
- 4.Hackman T, Snyderman CH, Carrau R, Vescan A, Kassam A. Juvenile nasopharyngeal angiofibroma: the expanded endonasal approach. Am J Rhinol Allergy. 2009;23:95–9.Google Scholar
- 5.Beals SP, Joganic EF, Hamilton MG, Spetzler RF. Posterior skull base transfacial approaches. Clin Plast Surg. 1995;22:491–511.Google Scholar
- 6.Feiz-Erfan I, Han PP, Spetzler RF, Horn EM, Klopfenstein JD, Porter RW, et al. The radical transbasal approach for resection of anterior and midline skull base lesions. J Neurosurg. 2005;103:485–90.Google Scholar
- 7.Radkowski D, McGill T, Healy GB, Ohlms L, Jones DT. Angiofibroma. Changes in staging and treatment. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1996;122:122–9.Google Scholar
- 8.Kalani MY, Rangel-Castilla L, Ramey W, Nakaji P, Albuquerque FC, McDougall CG, et al. Indications and results of direct cerebral revascularization in the modern era. World Neurosurg. 2015;83:345–50.Google Scholar
- 9.Feiz-Erfan I, Han PP, Spetzler RF, Horn EM, Klopfenstein JD, Kim LJ, et al. Preserving olfactory function in anterior craniofacial surgery through cribriform plate osteotomy applied in selected patients. Neurosurgery. 2005;57(1 Suppl):86–93; discussion 86–93.Google Scholar
- 10.Tessier P. Complete and forme fruste vertical and oblique orbito-facial clefts (colobomas). Ann Chir Plast. 1969;14:301–11.Google Scholar
- 11.Tessier P. The definitive plastic surgical treatment of the severe facial deformities of craniofacial dysostosis. Crouzon’s and Apert’s diseases. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1971;48:419–42.Google Scholar
- 12.Derome P. The trans-bucco-pharyngeal approach and tumoral pathology of the clivus. Neuro-Chirurgie. 1977;23:298–306.Google Scholar
- 13.Teo C, Dornhoffer J, Hanna E, Bower C. Application of skull base techniques to pediatric neurosurgery. Childs Nerv Syst. 1999;15:103–9.Google Scholar
- 14.Posnick JC, Goldstein JA, Armstrong D, Rutka JT. Reconstruction of skull defects in children and adolescents by the use of fixed cranial bone grafts: long-term results. Neurosurgery. 1993;32:785–91; discussion 91.Google Scholar
- 15.Roche PH, Paris J, Regis J, Moulin G, Zanaret M, Thomassin JM, et al. Management of invasive juvenile nasopharyngeal angiofibromas: the role of a multimodality approach. Neurosurgery. 2007;61:768–77; discussion 77.Google Scholar
- 16.Danesi G, Panizza B, Mazzoni A, Calabrese V. Anterior approaches in juvenile nasopharyngeal angiofibromas with intracranial extension. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2000;122:277–83.Google Scholar
- 17.Jones GC, DeSanto LW, Bremer JW, Neel 3rd HB. Juvenile angiofibromas. Behavior and treatment of extensive and residual tumors. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1986;112:1191–3.Google Scholar
- 18.Fagan JJ, Snyderman CH, Carrau RL, Janecka IP. Nasopharyngeal angiofibromas: selecting a surgical approach. Head Neck. 1997;19:391–9.Google Scholar
- 19.Close LG, Schaefer SD, Mickey BE, Manning SC. Surgical management of nasopharyngeal angiofibroma involving the cavernous sinus. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1989;115:1091–5.Google Scholar
- 20.Fisch U, Pillsbury HC. Infratemporal fossa approach to lesions in the temporal bone and base of the skull. Arch Otolaryngol. 1979;105:99–107.Google Scholar
- 21.Andrews JC, Fisch U, Valavanis A, Aeppli U, Makek MS. The surgical management of extensive nasopharyngeal angiofibromas with the infratemporal fossa approach. Laryngoscope. 1989;99:429–37.Google Scholar
- 22.Dahl JP, Zopf DA, Parikh SR. Do open and endoscopic resection approaches to juvenile nasopharyngeal angiofibroma result in similar blood loss and recurrence rates? Laryngoscope. 2015;125:2436–7.Google Scholar
- 23.Boghani Z, Husain Q, Kanumuri VV, Khan MN, Sangvhi S, Liu JK, et al. Juvenile nasopharyngeal angiofibroma: a systematic review and comparison of endoscopic, endoscopic-assisted, and open resection in 1047 cases. Laryngoscope. 2013;123:859–69.Google Scholar
- 24.Garofalo P, Pia F, Policarpo M, Tunesi S, Valletti PA. Juvenile nasopharyngeal angiofibroma: comparison between endoscopic and open operative approaches. J Craniofac Surg. 2015;26:918–821.Google Scholar
- 25.Huang Y, Liu Z, Wang J, Sun X, Yang L, Wang D. Surgical management of juvenile nasopharyngeal angiofibroma: analysis of 162 cases from 1995 to 2012. Laryngoscope. 2014;124:1942–6.Google Scholar