A Method for Situating Capability Viewpoints

Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing book series (LNBIP, volume 261)

Abstract

This paper presents a method that is used to enrich existing architecture frameworks or methods by enabling development of situated capability viewpoints. The method addresses the issue that in many cases viewpoint definitions suggest a singular way to consider and model a domain. This issue is particularly prevalent in frameworks developed by one profession, such as IT architects, where general concepts, such as capability and service, may have narrow definitions. The method we suggest is to start with a base capability viewpoint and then tailor that into specific situated capability viewpoints by incorporating situational concerns. Each tailored viewpoint supports a stakeholder’s work situation and aims to increase intended and actual use of capability analysis. The method is built upon the ISO 42010 standard, an extendable base capability viewpoint, and concepts from method engineering. The method is demonstrated by applying it to the Strategy Map framework by Kaplan and Norton.

Keywords

Viewpoint Capability Capability analysis Enterprise architecture Situation Situational methods engineering Interweaving 

References

  1. 1.
    Kusunoki, K., Nonaka, I., Nagata, A.: Organizational capabilities in product development of Japanese firms: a conceptual framework and empirical findings. Organ. Sci. 9, 699–718 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bērziša, S., Bravos, G., Gonzalez, T.C., Czubayko, U., España, S., Grabis, J., Henkel, M., Jokste, L., Kampars, J., Koç, H., Kuhr, J.-C., Llorca, C., Loucopoulos, P., Pascual, R.J., Pastor, O., Sandkuhl, K., Simic, H., Stirna, J., Valverde, F.G., Zdravkovic, J.: Capability driven development: an approach to designing digital enterprises. Bus. Inf. Syst. Eng. 57, 15–25 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ulrich, W., Rosen, M.: The Business Capability Map: The “Rosetta Stone” of Business/IT Alignment. https://www.cutter.com
  4. 4.
    Harmon, P.: Capabilities and Processes. http://www.bptrends.com/publicationfiles/advisor20110712.pdf
  5. 5.
    The Open Group: TOGAF Version 9.1 - The Open Group Architecture Framework (TOGAF) (2011)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Malavolta, I., Lago, P., Muccini, H., Pelliccione, P., Tang, A.: What industry needs from architectural languages: a survey. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng. 39, 869–891 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    ISO/IEC, IEEE: ISO/IEC 42010:2011 Systems and software engineering — Architecture description (2011)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Teece, D.J.: Explicating dynamic capabilities: the nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strateg. Manag. J. 28, 1319–1350 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Dosi, G., Nelson, R., Winter, S.: The Nature and Dynamics of Organizational Capabilities. OUP, Oxford (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Schreyögg, G., Kliesch-Eberl, M.: How dynamic can organizational capabilities be? Towards a dual-process model of capability dynamization. Strateg. Manag. J. 28, 913–933 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    McKeen, J.D., Smith, H.: IT Strategy, 2nd edn. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River (2011)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Henkel, M., Bider, I., Perjons, E.: Capability-based business model transformation. In: Iliadis, L., Papazoglou, M., Pohl, K. (eds.) CAiSE Workshops 2014. LNBIP, vol. 178, pp. 88–99. Springer, Heidelberg (2014)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Stirna, J., Grabis, J., Henkel, M., Zdravkovic, J.: Capability driven development – an approach to support evolving organizations. In: Sandkuhl, K., Seigerroth, U., Stirna, J. (eds.) PoEM 2012. LNBIP, vol. 134, pp. 117–131. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Beimborn, D., Martin, S.F., Homann, U.: Capability-oriented modeling of the firm. Presented at the IPSI-2005, Amalfi (2005)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Henderson-Sellers, B., Ralyte, J.: Situational method engineering: state-of-the-art review. J. Comput. Sci. 16, 424–478 (2010)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ralyte, J., Deneckere, R., Rolland, C.: Towards a generic model for situational method engineering. In: Eder, J., Missikoff, M. (eds.) CAiSE 2003. LNCS, vol. 2681, pp. 95–110. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Peffers, K., Tuunanen, T., Rothenberger, M., Chatterjee, S.: A design science research methodology for information systems research. J. Manag. Inf. Syst. 24, 45–77 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kaplan, R.S., Norton, D.P.: The Execution Premium: Linking Strategy to Operations for Competitive Advantage. Harvard Business School Press, Brighton (2008)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hevner, A.R., March, S.T., Park, J., Ram, S.: Design science in information systems research. Mis Q. 28, 75–105 (2004)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Sowa, J.F., Zachman, J.A.: Extending and formalizing the framework for information systems architecture. IBM Syst. J. 31, 1–27 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Object Management Group: Semantics of Business Vocabulary and Business Rules (SBVR), v1.0 (2008)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    ISO/IEC: ISO 24744:2007 Software Engineering - Metamodel for Development Methodologies (2007)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Venkatesh, V., Morris, M.G., Davis, G.B., Davis, F.D.: User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view. MIS Q. 27, 425–478 (2003)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Tell, A.W.: What capability is not. In: Johansson, B., Andersson, B., Holmberg, N. (eds.) BIR 2014. LNBIP, vol. 194, pp. 128–142. Springer, Heidelberg (2014)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Checkland, P.: Soft systems methodology: a thirty year retrospective. Syst. Res. Behav. Sci. 17, S11–S58 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Tools for Institutional, Political, and Social Analysis of Policy Reform. World Bank Publications (2007)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Haeckel, S.: Adaptive Enterprise: Creating and Leading Sense-and-Respond Organizations. Harvard Business School Press, Brighton (1999)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Leinwand, P., Mainardi, C.: The Essential Advantage: How to Win with a Capabilities-Driven Strategy. Harvard Business Press, Brighton (2013)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    International Institute of Business Analysis: A Guide to the Business Analysis Body of Knowledge® (BABOK Guide) Version 2.0 (2009)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Robeyns, I.: The capability approach: a theoretical survey. J. Hum. Dev. 6, 93–117 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Stockholm UniversityStockholmSweden

Personalised recommendations