Advertisement

Assessment of Secondary Mitral Regurgitation

  • Raluca Dulgheru
  • Pierluigi Incarnato
  • Patrizio LancellottiEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

Chronic secondary mitral regurgitation (SMR) is a complex entity that complicates either ischemic heart disease or dilated cardiomyopathy. When present, SMR may exhibit a broad range of severity and confers an adverse prognosis, which is worse with increasing severity of MR. Non-invasive imaging and, in particular, echocardiography, plays a critical role for the initial and longitudinal assessment, for individual risk stratification and outcome prediction, and for guiding intervention in patients with chronic SMR.

Keywords

Secondary mitral regurgitation 2D and 3D echocardiography Quantification Prognosis Heart failure 

Supplementary material

Movie 6.1

Apical displacement of the coaptation point of the mitral valve leaflets in a patient with secondary mitral regurgitation and systolic heart failure (AVI 8231 kb)

Movie 6.2

Papillary muscle elongation leading to a type II Carpentier mitral regurgitation (AVI 8133 kb)

Movie 6.3

Flow convergence area is hemielliptic in this patient with chronic secondary mitral regurgitation, as depicted with the help of 3D colour flow Doppler transthoracic echocardiography. Applying the PISA 2D method may lead to underestimation of effective regurgitant orifice area and regurgitant volume (AVI 1240 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Rossi A, Dini F, Faggiano P, et al. Independent prognostic value of functional mitral regurgitation in patients with heart failure. A quantitative analysis of 1256 patients with ischaemic and non-ischaemic dilated cardiomyopathy. Heart Br Card Soc. 2011;97:1675–80.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Otsuji Y, Hanschumacher MD, Liel-Cohen N, et al. Mechanism of ischemic mitral regurgitation with segmental left ventricular dysfunction: three-dimensional echocardiographic studies in models of acute and chronic progressive regurgitation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001;37:641–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Chaput M, Handschumacher MD, Tournoux F, et al. Mitral leaflet adaptation to ventricular remodeling: occurrence and adequacy in patients with functional mitral regurgitation. Circulation. 2008;118:845–52.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Saito K, Okura H, Watanabe N, et al. Influence of chronic tethering of the mitral valve on mitral leaflet size and coaptation in functional mitral regurgitation. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2012;5:337–45.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Schwammenthal E, Popescu AC, Popescu BA, et al. Mechanism of mitral regurgitation in inferior wall acute myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol. 2002;90:306–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Pierard LA, Lancellotti P. The role of ischemic mitral regurgitation in the pathogenesis of acute pulmonary edema. N Engl J Med. 2004;351:1627–34.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Michler RE, Smith PK, Parides MK, et al. Two-year outcomes of surgical treatment of moderate ischemic mitral regurgitation. N Engl J Med. 2016;374:1932–41.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Grigioni F, Basmadjian A, Enriquez-Sarano M. Ischemic mitral regurgitation: impact on outcome and implications of quantitative measurements. Circulation. 1999;100:I-378.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Grigioni F, Enriquez-Sarano M, Zehr KJ, Bailey KR, Tajik AJ. Ischemic mitral regurgitation. Long-term outcome and prognostic implications with quantitative Doppler assessment. Circulation. 2001;103:1759–64.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ogawa S, Hubbard FE, Mardelli TJ, Dreifus LS. Cross-sectional echocardiographic spectrum of papillary muscle dysfunction. Am Heart J. 1979;97:312–21.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Godley R, Wann L, Rogers E, Feigenbaum H, Weyman A. Incomplete mitral leaflet closure in patients with papillary muscle dysfunction. Circulation. 1981;63:565–71.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Otsuji Y, Handschumacher M, Schwammenthal E, et al. Insights from three dimensional echocardiography into the mechanism of functional mitral regurgitation. Circulation. 1997;96:1999–2008.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Yiu SF, Enriquez-Sarano M, Tribouilloy C, Seward JB, Tajik AJ. Determinants of the degree of functional mitral regurgitation in patients with systolic left ventricular dysfunction: a quantitative clinical study. Circulation. 2000;102:1400–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kaul S, Spotnitz W, Glasheen W, Touchstone D. Mechanism of ischemic mitral regurgitation: an experimental evaluation. Circulation. 1991;84:2167–80.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Messas E, Guerrero JL, Handschumacher MD, et al. Paradoxic decrease in ischemic mitral regurgitation with papillary muscle dysfunction: insights from three-dimensional and contrast echocardiography with strain rate measurement. Circulation. 2001;104:1952–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Agricola E, Oppizzi M, Maisano F, et al. Echocardiographic classification of chronic ischemic mitral regurgitation caused by restricted motion according to tethering pattern. Eur J Echocardiogr. 2004;5:326–34.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Lancellotti P, Zamorano JL, Vannan MA. Imaging challenges in secondary mitral regurgitation: unsolved issues and perspectives. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2014;7:735–46.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ypenburg C, Lancellotti P, Tops LF, et al. Acute effects of initiation and withdrawal of cardiac resynchronization therapy on papillary muscle dyssynchrony and mitral regurgitation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007;50:2071–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Srichai MB, Grimm RA, Stillman AE, et al. Ischemic mitral regurgitation: impact of the left ventricle and mitral valve in patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction. Ann Thorac Surg. 2005;80:170–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Magne J, Pibarot P, Dagenais F, et al. Preoperative posterior leaflet angle accurately predicts outcome after restrictive mitral valve annuloplasty for ischemic mitral regurgitation. Circulation. 2007;115:782–91.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kongsaerepong V, Shiota M, Gillinov AM, et al. Echocardiographic predictors of successful versus unsuccessful mitral valve repair in ischemic mitral regurgitation. Am J Cardiol. 2006;98:504–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Magne J, Pibarot P, Dumesnil JG, Senechal M. Continued global left ventricular remodeling is not the sole mechanism responsible for the late recurrence of ischemic mitral regurgitation after restrictive annuloplasty. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2009;22:1256–64.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Breithardt OA, Sinha AM, Schwammenthal E, et al. Acute effects of cardiac resynchronization therapy on functional mitral regurgitation in advanced systolic heart failure. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003;41:765–70.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Beaudoin J, Thai WE, Wai B, et al. Assessment of mitral valve adaptation with gated cardiac computed tomography: validation with three-dimensional echocardiography and mechanistic insight to functional mitral regurgitation. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2013;6:784–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Watanabe N, Ogasawara Y, Yamaura Y, et al. Geometric deformity of the mitral annulus in patients with ischemic mitral regurgitation: a real-time three-dimensional echocardiographic study. J Heart Valve Dis. 2005;14:447–52.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Otsuji Y, Kumanohoso T, Yoshifuku S, et al. Isolated annular dilation does not usually cause important functional mitral regurgitation: comparison between patients with lone atrial fibrillation and those with idiopathic or ischemic cardiomyopathy. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2002;39:1651–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Ahmad RM, Gillinov AM, McCarthy PM, et al. Annular geometry and motion in human ischemic mitral regurgitation: novel assessment with three-dimensional echocardiography and computer reconstruction. Ann Thorac Surg. 2004;78:2063–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Daimon M, Gillinov AM, Liddicoat JR, et al. Dynamic change in mitral annular area and motion during percutaneous mitral annuloplasty for ischemic mitral regurgitation: preliminary animal study with real-time 3-dimensional echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2007;20:381–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Levine R, Handschumacher M, Sanfilippo A, et al. Three-dimensional echocardiographic reconstruction of the mitral valve, with implications for the diagnosis of mitral valve prolapse. Circulation. 1989;80:589–58.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Watanabe N, Ogasawara Y, Yamaura Y, et al. Mitral annulus flattens in ischemic mitral regurgitation: geometric differences between inferior and anterior myocardial infarction. A real-time 3-dimensional echocardiographic study. Circulation. 2005;112:I-458–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Gelsomino S, Lorusso R, De Cicco G, et al. Five-year echocardiographic results of combined undersized mitral ring annuloplasty and coronary artery bypass grafting for chronic ischaemic mitral regurgitation. Eur Heart J. 2008;29:231.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Hung J, Papakostas L, Tahta SA, et al. Mechanism of recurrent ischemic mitral regurgitation after annuloplasty: continued LV remodeling as a moving target. Circulation. 2004;110:II85–90.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Roshanali F, Mandegar MH, Yousefnia MA, Rayatzadeh H, Alaeddini F. A prospective study of predicting factors in ischemic mitral regurgitation recurrence after ring annuloplasty. Ann Thorac Surg. 2007;84:745–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Goldstein D, Moskowitz AJ, Gelijns AC, et al. Two-year outcomes of surgical treatment of severe ischemic mitral regurgitation. N Engl J Med. 2016;374:344–53.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Acker MA, Parides MK, Perrault LP, et al. Mitral-valve repair versus replacement for severe ischemic mitral regurgitation. N Engl J Med. 2014;370:23–32.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Vahanian A, Alfieri O, Andreotti F, et al. Guidelines on the management of valvular heart disease (version 2012). Eur Heart J. 2012;33:2451–96.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Lancellotti P, Tribouilloy C, Hagendorff A, et al. Recommendations for the echocardiographic assessment of native valvular regurgitation: an executive summary from the European association of cardiovascular imaging. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2013;14:611–44.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Enriquez-Sarano M, Bailey KR, Seward JB, et al. Quantitative Doppler assessment of valvular regurgitation. Circulation. 1993;87:841–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Enriquez-Sarano M, Seward JB, Bailey KR, Tajik AJ. Effective regurgitant origice area: a noninvasive Doppler development of an old hemodynamic concept. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1994;23:443–51.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Lancellotti P, Moura L, Pierard LA, et al. European association of echocardiography recommendations for the assessment of valvular regurgitation. Part 2: mitral and tricuspid regurgitation (native valve disease). Eur J Echocardiogr. 2010;11:307–32.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Enriquez-Sarano M, Miller FA, Hayes SN, Bailey KR, Tajik J. Effective mitral regurgitation orifice area: clinical use and pitfalls of the proximal isovelocity surface area method. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1995;25:703–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Schwammenthal E, Chen C, Benning F, et al. Dynamics of mitral regurgitant flow and orifice area. Physiologic application of the proximal flow convergence method: clinical data and experimental testing. Circulation. 1994;90:307–22.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Song JM, Kim MJ, Kim YJ, et al. Three-dimensional characteristics of functional mitral regurgitation in patients with severe left ventricular dysfunction: a real-time 3-dimensional color Doppler echocardiography study. Heart. 2008;94:590.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Yosefy C, Levine RA, Solis J, et al. Proximal flow convergence region as assessed by real-time 3-dimensional echocardiography: challenging the hemispheric assumption. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2007;20:389–96.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Yosefy C, Hung J, Chua S, et al. Direct measurement of vena contracta area by real-time 3-dimensional echocardiography for assessing severity of mitral regurgitation. Am J Cardiol. 2009;104:978–83.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Thavendiranathan P, Phelan D, Thomas J, Flamm S, Marwick T. Quantitative assessment of mitral regurgitation: validation of new methods. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012;60:1470–83.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Grady L, Datta S, Kutter O, et al. Regurgitation quantification using 3D PISA in volume echocardiography. Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv. 2011;14:512–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Kahlert P, Plicht B, Schenk IM, et al. Direct assessment of size and shape of noncircular vena contracta area in functional versus organic mitral regurgitation using real-time three-dimensional echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2008;21:912–21.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Levine RA, Hung J. Ischemic mitral regurgitation, the dynamic lesion: clues to the cure. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003;42:1929–32.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Lancellotti P, Lebrun F, Pierard LA. Determinants of exercise-induced changes in mitral regurgitation in patients with coronary artery disease and left ventricular dysfunction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003;42:1921–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Lebrun F, Lancellotti P, Pierard LA. Quantitation of functional mitral regurgitation during bicycle exercise in patients with heart failure. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001;38:1685–92.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Rizzello V, Poldermans D, Boersma E, et al. Opposite patterns of left ventricular remodeling after coronary revascularization in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy: role of myocardial viability. Circulation. 2004;110:2383–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Seghatol F, Shah D, Diluzio S, et al. Relation between contractile reserve and improvement in left ventricular function with beta-blocker therapy in patients with heart failure secondary to ischemic or idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy. Am J Cardiol. 2004;93:854–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Sicari R, Picano E, Cortigiani L, et al. Prognostic value of myocardial viability recognized by low-dose dobutamine echocardiography in chronic ischemic left ventricular dysfunction. Am J Cardiol. 2003;92:1263–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Feldman T, Foster E, et al. Percutaneous repair or surgery for mitral regurgitation. N Engl J Med. 2011;364(15):1395–406.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Feldman T, Wasserman HS, Herrmann HC, et al. Percutaneous mitral valve repair using the edge-to-edge technique: six-month results of the EVEREST phase I clinical trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005;46:2134–40.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Zamorano JL, Badano LP, et al. EAE/ASE recommendations for the use of echocardiography in new transcatheter interventions for valvular heart disease. Eur Heart J. 2011;32(17):2189–214.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Raluca Dulgheru
    • 1
  • Pierluigi Incarnato
    • 1
  • Patrizio Lancellotti
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  1. 1.University of Liège Hospital, GIGA Cardiovascular Sciences, Departments of Cardiology, Heart Valve Clinic, CHU Sart TilmanLiègeBelgium
  2. 2.Gruppo Villa Maria Care and ResearchAnthea HospitalBariItaly

Personalised recommendations